Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Belinda Bencic vs Nao Hibino Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bencic vs Hibino analysis and find out who is favored!
Belinda Bencic vs Nao Hibino Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bencic has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Hibino has won 44.48%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bencic, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hibino has won 54.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 37.04% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bencic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hibino has saved 54.13% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bencic has won 58.82% of matches played (W/L 10/ 7), with Hibino winning 54.29% (W/L 38/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bencic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 68% (W/L 56/ 26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 77/ 46). Hibino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 43/ 49).
- Player level: In the last year, Bencic has played most of their matches on the Grand Slam, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 6/ 3), where as Hibino has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 10/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bencic has played against opponents with an average rank of 109 while Hibino has played against players with an average rank of 199.66.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bencic has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hibino has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bencic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hibino has converted 48.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bencic 0 - 0 Hibino
91
Rank
4
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
85
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
66% (393-204)
Career Total W/L
56% (368-293)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
56% (14-11)
$9,238,451
Career Prize Money
$1,225,315
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Belinda Bencic | Nao Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (14/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (32/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (290/274) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (12/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 46 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 64 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:45:28 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 146.56 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (1239/1842) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (778/1239) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (276/603) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (102/218) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (815/1869) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (8/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (14/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 75% (12/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (12/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 38% (13/5) |
Belinda Bencic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Belinda Bencic
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
97
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Sorana Cirstea
Player
Belinda Bencic
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Lin Zhu
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
104)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(1) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Yuriko Miyazaki
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
44%
(
28 of
63)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Belinda Bencic
55%
(
50 of
91)
1st Serve %
47%
(
44 of
93)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
14
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
49)
67%
(
10 of
15)
Break Points Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
52%
(
47 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
54 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Belinda Bencic
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
8
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Petra Kvitova
53%
(
66 of
125)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
6
Aces
5
13
Double Faults
5
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
46%
(
27 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
38%
(
48 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
110
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Alycia Parks
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
99)
2
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
11
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Lucia Bronzetti
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
77 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Danilina
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
6
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
60 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
112
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Harriet Dart
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
91)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Nao Hibino
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Venus Williams
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Su-Wei Hsieh
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Julia Riera
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
47%
(
43 of
91)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Bencic Vs Hibino Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
