Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Bekkhan Atlangeriev vs Daniel Little Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Atlangeriev vs Little analysis and find out who is favored!
Bekkhan Atlangeriev vs Daniel Little Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Atlangeriev has won 49.65% of points on his second serve, while Little has won 44.32%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Atlangeriev, in recent form, has won 51.22% of his opponent's second serve points, while Little has won 47.67%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.37% and 18.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Atlangeriev has saved 47.46% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Little has saved 60% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Atlangeriev has won 40.74% of matches played (W/L 11/ 16), with Little winning 44% (W/L 11/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Atlangeriev has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 48/ 45), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 37% (W/L 23/ 40). Little has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Atlangeriev has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40.74% of matches (W/L 11/ 16), where as Little has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45.83% of matches (W/L 11/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Atlangeriev winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Atlangeriev winning 1 and Little winning 2. The last match between Atlangeriev and Little was at the M25 Idanha-a-Nova, 12-07-2021, Q2 round, Hard with Daniel Little getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Atlangeriev and Little have played a deciding set 1 times, with Atlangeriev winning 0 times and Little 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Atlangeriev winning 0, and Little 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Atlangeriev has played against opponents with an average rank of 121 while Little has played against players with an average rank of 326.16.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Atlangeriev has won 17% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Little has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Atlangeriev has converted 48.84% of breakpoint opportunities, and Little has converted 60% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Atlangeriev 0 - 1 Little
894
Rank
639
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
847
Rank
564
High
26
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
46% (82-96)
Career Total W/L
56% (92-72)
64% (9-5)
YTD W/L
33% (1-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Atlangeriev VS Little H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Bekkhan Atlangeriev | Daniel Little |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 10 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:0 | 1:29:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (40/68) | 50% (29/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (23/40) | 83% (24/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (15/28) | 55% (16/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 22% (2/9) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (18/58) | 44% (30/68) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Atlangeriev VS Little H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 4-6 10-2 |
Stats 
Daniel Little
Player
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Bekkhan Atlangeriev | Daniel Little |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (9/5) | 33% (1/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (20/11) | 33% (2/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (164/134) | 44% (28/36) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.34 |
| Aces Total | 38 | 11 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 23 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 79.71 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (350/547) | 58% (120/208) |
| 1st Serve W% | 78% (274/350) | 76% (91/120) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (104/197) | 44% (39/88) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (32/59) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (258/612) | 31% (61/194) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (9/5) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (9/14) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (8/8) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (8/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 0% (2/0) |
Bekkhan Atlangeriev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
Player
Yuvan Nandal
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
Player
Federico Campana
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
Player
Ivan Kazakov
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
Player
Credit Chaiyarin
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Filippo Romano
Player
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
50
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 1-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
Player
Nikita Repkin
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sergey Fomin
Player
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
11
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
84
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
19 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
Player
Kirill Kolganov
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Little Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Lorusso
Player
Daniel Little
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
10
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Daniel Little
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Stijn Pel
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
38 of
46)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
24 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Daniel Little
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Thomas Deschamps
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
20
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
14 of
54)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Theo Papamalamis
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
52%
(
64 of
123)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
28%
(
26 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
47 of
123)
113
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Daniel Little
84%
(
72 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oscar Weightman
Player
Daniel Little
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luc Koenig
Player
Daniel Little
66%
(
81 of
123)
1st Serve %
63%
(
80 of
127)
7
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
60 of
80)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
45 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
47 of
127)
125
Total Points Won
125
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Oscar Weightman
60%
(
64 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
108)
12
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
7
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
101
|
6-2 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Atlangeriev Vs Little Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Bekkhan Atlangeriev
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
