Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Richel Hogenkamp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Maia vs Hogenkamp analysis and find out who is favored!
Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Richel Hogenkamp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Maia has won 49.92% of points on his second serve, while Hogenkamp has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Maia, in recent form, has won 53.32% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hogenkamp has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.67% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Maia has saved 57.81% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hogenkamp has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Maia has won 58.62% of matches played (W/L 34/ 24), with Hogenkamp winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Maia has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 205/ 103), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 13/ 9). Hogenkamp has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 215/ 132), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 14/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Maia has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50% of matches (W/L 10/ 10), where as Hogenkamp has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Maia winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Maia winning 4 and Hogenkamp winning 1. The last match between Maia and Hogenkamp was at the Korea Open - Seoul, 23-09-2017, Semifinals, Hard with Beatriz Haddad Maia getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:52:4.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Maia and Hogenkamp have played a deciding set 1 times, with Maia winning 1 times and Hogenkamp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Maia winning 1, and Hogenkamp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Maia has played against opponents with an average rank of 107.1 while Hogenkamp has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Maia has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hogenkamp has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Maia has converted 42.47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hogenkamp has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Maia 2 - 0 Hogenkamp
21
Total
1
Mast
11
Chall
0
Slam
2
Main
7
Minor
13
Rank
10
High
27
Age
L
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
896
Rank
94
High
31
Age
R
Plays
16
Total
0
Mast
12
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
Form
66% (452-231)
Career Total W/L
59% (414-282)
47% (8-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,158,814
Career Prize Money
$542,444
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Richel Hogenkamp |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
Games Won | 29 | 17 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 0:52:4 | 0:52:4 |
1st Serve % | 72% (53/74) | 55% (41/74) |
1st Serve Win% | 74% (39/53) | 61% (25/41) |
2nd Serve Win% | 48% (10/21) | 52% (17/33) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 13% (1/8) |
Return Points W% | 43% (32/74) | 34% (25/74) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 7-6(7) |
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
4-6 6-0 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Richel Hogenkamp |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 47% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 49% (20/21) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 50% (192/191) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.15 | 0 |
Aces Total | 28 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
DFs Total | 37 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 2:3:38 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 103.12 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 70% (870/1246) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (551/870) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (186/376) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 47% (51/109) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 41% (500/1232) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (8/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 70% (10/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 30% (10/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Beatriz Haddad Maia Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 |
Katie Boulter
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Diane Parry
75%
(
66 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Katie Boulter
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
53%
(
43 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
41 of
80)
4
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
83%
(
57 of
69)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Xinyu Wang
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Daria Kasatkina
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
76%
(
83 of
109)
1st Serve %
79%
(
85 of
108)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
49 of
85)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
45%
(
49 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Ons Jabeur
78%
(
51 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Magda Linette
74%
(
93 of
126)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
116)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
45 of
76)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
49 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
51 of
116)
128
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(6) 6-7(1) 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Richel Hogenkamp Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yuki Naito
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Anastasia Tikhonova
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Ekaterina Kazionova
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
31 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Carol Zhao
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
4
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Christina Rosca
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Salma Djoubri
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H |
view more