search

Bart Stevens vs Mats Hermans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stevens vs Hermans analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Bart Stevens vs Mats Hermans Important H2H Prediction Stats:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stevens has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Hermans has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stevens, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hermans has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Stevens has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hermans has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Stevens has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Hermans winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Stevens has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 70% (W/L 14/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 19/ 17). Hermans has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 80/ 76), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
  • Player level: In the last year, Stevens has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Hermans has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Stevens winning 3 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Stevens winning 6 and Hermans winning 2. The last match between Stevens and Hermans was at the Netherlands F3 (Middelburg), 03-07-2017, Q3, Clay with Bart Stevens getting the victory .
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Stevens and Hermans have played a deciding set 2 times, with Stevens winning 2 times and Hermans 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Stevens winning 0, and Hermans 2.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stevens has played against opponents with an average rank of 388 while Hermans has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stevens has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hermans has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Stevens has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hermans has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365

Head-to-head: Stevens 3 - 0 Hermans

Bart Stevens

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

862

Rank

736

High

26

Age

R

Plays

3

Total

0

0

Hard

0

2

Clay

0

1

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

N/A

Rank

High

28

Age

R

Plays

Mats Hermans

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

3

Total

0

0

Hard

0

2

Clay

0

1

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

L W L L L L L L L L

Form

W W L W L W W W L L

54% (102-86)

Career Total W/L

49% (90-95)

0% (0-0)

YTD W/L

0% (0-0)

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Stevens VS Hermans H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Bart Stevens Mats Hermans
All H2H Matches 3 0
Sets Won 6 2
Games Won 43 22
Aces (Total) 0 0
DFs (Total) 0 0
Avg Match Time 0:0:0 0:0:0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Points W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (3/3) 0% (0/3)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/2) 100% (2/2)
Deciding Set Win% 100% (2/2) 0% (0/2)
1st set W, W 100% (2/2) 0% (1/0)
1st set W, L 0% (2/0) 100% (1/1)
1st set L, W 100% (1/1) 0% (2/0)

Stevens VS Hermans H2h Matches played

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Bart Stevens Mats Hermans
YTD W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0 0
Aces Total 0 0
DFs per game 0 0
DFs Total 0 0
Avg Match Time 1st Match 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 0 0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)

Bart Stevens Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
Q1
cross
Elliot Benchetrit
Player
Bart Stevens
72% ( 38 of 53)
1st Serve %
67% ( 45 of 67)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
84% ( 32 of 38)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 31 of 45)
67% ( 10 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 9 of 22)
33% ( 2 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
21% ( 11 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 27 of 67)
69
Total Points Won
51
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Martin Krumich
Player
Bart Stevens
57% ( 20 of 35)
1st Serve %
63% ( 33 of 52)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
95% ( 19 of 20)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 20 of 33)
73% ( 11 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
21% ( 4 of 19)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
14% ( 5 of 35)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 28 of 52)
58
Total Points Won
29
L
6-3 6-0 H2H
Q1
cross
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Bart Stevens
57% ( 51 of 89)
1st Serve %
56% ( 52 of 93)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
55% ( 28 of 51)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 28 of 52)
47% ( 18 of 38)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 18 of 41)
54% ( 7 of 13)
Break Points Won
60% ( 6 of 10)
48% ( 43 of 89)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 47 of 93)
93
Total Points Won
89
L
6-3 3-6 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Bart Stevens
62% ( 66 of 107)
1st Serve %
59% ( 65 of 111)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
10
73% ( 48 of 66)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 46 of 65)
56% ( 23 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 20 of 46)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
22% ( 2 of 9)
34% ( 36 of 107)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 45 of 111)
116
Total Points Won
102
L
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Hernan Casanova
Player
Bart Stevens
74% ( 46 of 62)
1st Serve %
72% ( 60 of 83)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
80% ( 37 of 46)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 32 of 60)
25% ( 4 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 12 of 23)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
34% ( 21 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 39 of 83)
80
Total Points Won
65
L
7-5 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Rio Noguchi
Player
Bart Stevens
79% ( 57 of 72)
1st Serve %
45% ( 33 of 74)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
51% ( 29 of 57)
1st Serve Won
42% ( 14 of 33)
40% ( 6 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 17 of 41)
62% ( 8 of 13)
Break Points Won
64% ( 7 of 11)
51% ( 37 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 43 of 74)
78
Total Points Won
68
L
7-6(4) 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Hernan Casanova
Player
Bart Stevens
77% ( 34 of 44)
1st Serve %
58% ( 34 of 59)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
65% ( 22 of 34)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 20 of 34)
70% ( 7 of 10)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 9 of 25)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
34% ( 15 of 44)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 30 of 59)
59
Total Points Won
44
L
6-3 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Jaroslav Pospisil
Player
Bart Stevens
54% ( 51 of 95)
1st Serve %
52% ( 53 of 101)
3
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
6
76% ( 39 of 51)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 40 of 53)
43% ( 19 of 44)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 18 of 48)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 4 of 8)
39% ( 37 of 95)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 43 of 101)
101
Total Points Won
95
L
3-6 7-6(2) 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Bart Stevens
Player
Alexandar Lazarov
50% ( 41 of 82)
1st Serve %
61% ( 49 of 80)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
16
68% ( 28 of 41)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 32 of 49)
39% ( 16 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 11 of 31)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
36% ( 4 of 11)
46% ( 38 of 82)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 37 of 80)
81
Total Points Won
81
W
1-6 6-3 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Bart Stevens
78% ( 42 of 54)
1st Serve %
59% ( 39 of 66)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
62% ( 26 of 42)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 22 of 39)
42% ( 5 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
26% ( 7 of 27)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
43% ( 23 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 37 of 66)
68
Total Points Won
52
L
6-2 6-4 H2H

Mats Hermans Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
QF
cross
Niccolo Catini
Player
Mats Hermans
72% ( 43 of 60)
1st Serve %
69% ( 47 of 68)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
60% ( 26 of 43)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 24 of 47)
65% ( 11 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 8 of 21)
36% ( 5 of 14)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
38% ( 23 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 36 of 68)
73
Total Points Won
55
L
6-2 6-3 H2H
Q1
W
w/o H2H
R1
cross
Tao Mu
Player
Mats Hermans
52% ( 50 of 97)
1st Serve %
62% ( 66 of 106)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
66% ( 33 of 50)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 40 of 66)
66% ( 31 of 47)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 21 of 40)
27% ( 4 of 15)
Break Points Won
25% ( 3 of 12)
34% ( 33 of 97)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 45 of 106)
109
Total Points Won
94
L
4-6 6-4 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Mats Hermans
Player
Asaf Friedler
54% ( 45 of 83)
1st Serve %
62% ( 36 of 58)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
56% ( 25 of 45)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 26 of 36)
47% ( 18 of 38)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 8 of 22)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
40% ( 4 of 10)
48% ( 40 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 24 of 58)
67
Total Points Won
74
W
0-6 6-4 10-8 H2H
Q2
W
6-2 6-1 H2H
Q1
W
6-2 6-3 H2H
Q2
L
6-2 3-3 ret. H2H
Q1
W
6-4 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Mats Hermans
64% ( 28 of 44)
1st Serve %
70% ( 38 of 54)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
96% ( 27 of 28)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 22 of 38)
56% ( 9 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 7 of 16)
100% ( 3 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
18% ( 8 of 44)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 25 of 54)
61
Total Points Won
37
L
6-3 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Mats Hermans
Player
Aaron James Williams
56% ( 49 of 88)
1st Serve %
59% ( 42 of 71)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
61% ( 30 of 49)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 26 of 42)
56% ( 22 of 39)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 16 of 29)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
33% ( 3 of 9)
41% ( 36 of 88)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 29 of 71)
81
Total Points Won
78
W
7-5 3-6 11-9 H2H

Stevens Vs Hermans Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions