Y. Kim
To Win
A. Miyamoto
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W L W W LForm
L L W L W L W W L WThey have played 2 sets in total, with Miyamoto winning 2 and Zvereva winning 0. The last match between Miyamoto and Zvereva was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 18-02-2025, Q3, Hard with Ayumi Miyamoto getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
W15 Sharm ElSheikh(18-02-2025)
18 Mar 2025 / First
18 Mar 2025 / Q3
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Ayumi Miyamoto
Player
Vlada Zvereva
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Predictions Theme: Insights on Upcoming Tennis Match
When analyzing the recent performance of Miyamoto and Zvereva in terms of their second serve, it is evident that Miyamoto has excelled by winning 44.3% of points in the last 6 months. In comparison, Zvereva has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 39.29%. It is crucial to note the significant correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
In recent form, Miyamoto's return game statistics demonstrate their superiority. Winning an impressive 59.14% of their opponent's second serve points, Miyamoto surpasses Zvereva who has a slightly lower success rate of 58.18%. Even when considering first serve returns, Miyamoto maintains an advantage with a 40.31% success rate compared to Zvereva's 39.9%. These return game statistics hold immense value in determining the favorite for this highly anticipated head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
An analysis of how players perform under pressure reveals that Miyamoto has successfully saved 52.45% of breakpoints in their recent matches. On the other hand, Zvereva has a slightly lower saving rate of 47.9%. This compelling statistic holds immense potential for in-game betting predictions.
Providing an overview of overall performance, Miyamoto has secured victory in 58.62% of matches played in the past year, boasting a win-loss record of 17-12. Conversely, Zvereva has a higher success rate of 64.41% with a win-loss record of 38-21. Taking these figures into account offers a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.
When examining the players' performance on different surfaces, it becomes evident that Miyamoto displays exceptional skills on grass courts. With a win percentage of 67% (2 wins, 1 loss), Miyamoto proves their mastery on this surface. However, their performance on clay courts falls significantly, with a mere 20% success rate (1 win, 4 losses). In contrast, Zvereva excels on clay, achieving a win percentage of 60% (38 wins, 25 losses), while struggling on hard courts with a similar 60% success rate (32 wins, 21 losses).
An examination of the players' levels exposes Miyamoto's inclination towards participating in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize fund of $10K throughout the past year. Within this tournament category, Miyamoto has emerged victorious in 66.67% of matches (10 wins, 5 losses). Conversely, Zvereva has also primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize fund of $10K, securing triumph in 64.29% of matches (36 wins, 20 losses). Comparing these statistics sheds light on the favorite for the match, although it is crucial to consider the event level they have been playing at.
Considering the average rank of their opponents, Miyamoto has been tested against players with an average rank of 400.76 in the past 12 months. Conversely, Zvereva has faced opponents with a lower average rank of 246.69. These opponent quality statistics provide valuable insights into the challenges faced by each player.
In the scenario where this match reaches a deciding set, Miyamoto has proven their ability to secure victory by winning 50% of deciding sets in the last 12 months. Zvereva, meanwhile, has achieved a slightly higher success rate of 54% in all matches played on the tour. These statistics hold significant relevance for individuals seeking live predictions and engaging in betting activities.
While past player performance remains an essential factor in predicting tennis matches, it is also crucial to consider current event statistics for indicators of an in-form player. The current event stats can be found in the section below. Moreover, some players often exhibit enhanced performance in specific events, which should be taken into account when making match predictions.
Examining the players' ability to convert break points provides valuable information for in-game live betting tips. Recent data indicates that Miyamoto has effectively converted 49.64% of breakpoint opportunities, while Zvereva has achieved a slightly lower conversion rate of 49.26% when attempting to break their opponents' serves. These statistics play a pivotal role for bettors when a breakpoint opportunity arises.
For those interested in advanced models that predict tennis matches, this article offers a comprehensive foundation. Please note that this resource is primarily intended for avid statistics enthusiasts.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Lizette Cabrera
Player
Ayumi Miyamoto
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ayumi Miyamoto
Player
Sarah Rokusek
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
49%
(
31 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ayumi Miyamoto
Player
Nagi Hanatani
74%
(
64 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jana Kovackova
Player
Ayumi Miyamoto
67%
(
65 of
97)
1st Serve %
79%
(
77 of
97)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
47%
(
46 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ayumi Miyamoto
Player
Vlada Zvereva
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Carolyn Ansari
Player
Ayumi Miyamoto
79%
(
67 of
85)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
47%
(
40 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ayumi Miyamoto
Player
Josy Daems
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ayumi Miyamoto
Player
Luiza Fullana
82%
(
53 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ayumi Miyamoto
Player
Lisa-Marie Rioux
82%
(
62 of
76)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
6-7(4) 6-1 10-6 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Julita Saner
Player
Vlada Zvereva
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Vlada Zvereva
Player
Polina Krumkachev
40%
(
4 of
10)
1st Serve %
70%
(
7 of
10)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ayumi Miyamoto
Player
Vlada Zvereva
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Remika Ohashi
Player
Vlada Zvereva
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Saoirse Breen
Player
Vlada Zvereva
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
69 of
96)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
5 of
27)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
View full predicted draw for Miyamoto