Ayumi Koshiishi vs Elena Micic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W W L L L
Form
L L L W W L W W W LHead-To-Head: Koshiishi 1 - 0 Micic
They have played 3 sets in total, with Koshiishi winning 2 and Micic winning 1. The last match between Koshiishi and Micic was at the W35 Burnie, 18-02-2025, First, Hard with Ayumi Koshiishi getting the victory 5-7 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ayumi Koshiishi | 1 |
| Elena Micic | 0 |
W35 Burnie(18-02-2025)
5
7
6
3
6
1
| Koshiishi | Stats | Micic |
|---|---|---|
| 56% (10-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 47% (7-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 421 | Ranking | 378 |
| 421 | Highest Rank | 364 |
| 24 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 8 | Titles | 0 |
| 63% (271-158) | Career Total W/L | 50% (73-72) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Paolini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
27 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Berrettini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
27 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Ayumi Koshiishi
Player
Elena Micic
63%
(
64 of
101)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 11 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:20:23 | Average Match Time | 2:20:23 |
| 63% (64/101) | 1st Serve % | 67% (60/90) |
| 66% (42/64) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (32/60) |
| 35% (13/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (12/30) |
| 80% (8/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (5/12) |
| 51% (46/90) | Return Points Win % | 46% (46/101) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ayumi Koshiishi vs Elena Micic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ayumi Koshiishi 1 - 0 Elena Micic
Recent Form Analysis: In their most recent performances over the past six months, Koshiishi has displayed a commendable second serve success rate, emerging victorious in 46.45% of points. Contrastingly, Micic has slightly surpassed Koshiishi with a 47.79% success rate on their second serve. It is worth noting that this statistical observation bears a significant correlation with the accuracy of match predictions.
Return Game Statistics: Analyzing return game statistics reveals that in recent form, Koshiishi has outshined their opponents on second serve points, winning an impressive 58.93% of them. Meanwhile, Micic has recorded a respectable rate of 56.99%. When focusing on first serve returns, Koshiishi has demonstrated a success rate of 45.93%, whereas Micic has achieved a slightly lower rate of 37.54%. These statistics further contribute to identifying the favored player in this head-to-head matchup, as there is a substantial correlation between these figures and the outcome of the game.
Under Pressure Assessment: Examining their ability to handle pressure situations, Koshiishi has illustrated their resilience by saving 52.11% of breakpoints in recent form. Comparatively, Micic has successfully saved 58.47% of breakpoints. This particular statistic is particularly valuable for making predictions related to in-game betting scenarios.
Performance Overview: Throughout the course of the previous year, Koshiishi has masterfully won 61.25% of their matches, boasting an impressive win-loss record of 49 wins to 31 losses. Micic, on the other hand, has exhibited commendable performance by securing victory in 62.9% of matches, with a win-loss record of 39 wins to 23 losses. These overall results provide us with an insightful overview to predict the potential outcome of their face-off.
Surface Specialization: Taking into account the preferred playing surfaces of both players, it is evident that Koshiishi's proficiency shines on the hard courts, as they have achieved a formidable 65% win rate (197 wins to 105 losses). Comparatively, Koshiishi's performance on indoor hard courts shows a lower success rate of 57% (21 wins to 16 losses). Micic, on the other hand, has showcased their prowess on hard courts, achieving a commendable win rate of 57% (62 wins to 47 losses). Conversely, Micic's performance on clay courts has been less exceptional, with a win rate of 18% (4 wins to 18 losses).
Player Evaluation: Evaluating the recent matches of the past year, Koshiishi has primarily competed in Challengers and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000. Impressively, they have emerged victorious in 58.21% of these matches, accumulating a win-loss record of 39 wins to 28 losses. In contrast, Micic has predominantly participated in the same category of tournaments, claiming victory in 62.96% of matches (34 wins to 20 losses). When comparing the statistics between these players to determine the favorite, it is crucial to consider the significance of the event level at which they have been competing.
Opponent Quality Assessment: Over the previous 12 months, Koshiishi has frequently encountered opponents with an average rank of 396.23. In contrast, Micic has faced players with an average rank of 377.61. These statistics shed light on the caliber of opponents each player has been confronted with, thereby influencing their overall performance.
Deciding Set Performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting, if the match enters a decisive set, Koshiishi has demonstrated praiseworthy proficiency by winning 63% of deciding sets throughout the past year. In comparison, Micic has showcased an outstanding 85% success rate in all matches played on the professional tour. These statistics provide valuable insights for those seeking to make informed in-game predictions.
Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While relying on past player performances can prove useful in predicting tennis matches, it is equally essential to consider the current event statistics for an indication of players' current form. To acquire a more accurate assessment of players' current capabilities, it is advisable to refer to the section below (eventStats) if they have already participated in matches within the ongoing tournament. Additionally, certain players may exhibit enhanced performances at specific events, further emphasizing the significance of such considerations in determining the anticipated outcome.
Break Point Conversion: In recent form, Koshiishi has impressively capitalized on 51.96% of breakpoint opportunities, showcasing their ability to convert crucial moments into their favor. Conversely, Micic has demonstrated a marginally lower conversion rate of 48.63% when presented with chances to break their opponents' serves. This statistic assumes a pivotal role in providing valuable in-game live betting tips whenever either player faces a breakpoint opportunity.
If you possess an interest in predictive models for tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. (Please note: This content caters to enthusiasts with a profound appreciation for statistical analyses.)
Ayumi Koshiishi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kyoka Okamura
Player
Ayumi Koshiishi
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Akiko Omae
Player
Ayumi Koshiishi
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sakura Hosogi
Player
Ayumi Koshiishi
82%
(
54 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ayumi Koshiishi
Player
Miho Kuramochi
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve %
85%
(
104 of
123)
5
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
5
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
52 of
104)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
51%
(
49 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
61 of
123)
109
Total Points Won
111
|
6-2 1-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayumi Koshiishi
Player
Alana Parnaby
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Ayumi Koshiishi
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ayumi Koshiishi
Player
Alicia Dale
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayumi Koshiishi
Player
Elena Micic
63%
(
64 of
101)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Ayumi Koshiishi
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayumi Koshiishi
Player
Monique Barry
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Elena Micic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Sakura Hosogi
Player
Elena Micic
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
86)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Yeon Woo Ku
71%
(
69 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
11
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
107
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Belle Thompson
73%
(
62 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Carolann Delaunay
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Elena Micic
74%
(
89 of
120)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
12
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
53 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
117
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Belle Thompson
74%
(
65 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
105
Total Points Won
84
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Larisa Arnautovic
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lizette Cabrera
Player
Elena Micic
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayumi Koshiishi
Player
Elena Micic
63%
(
64 of
101)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taylah Preston
Player
Elena Micic
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (271/158) | Win/Loss | 50% (73/72) |
| 62% (587/365) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (163/165) |
| 55% (4678/3767) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (1486/1470) |
| 65% (201/108) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (62/49) |
| 63% (26/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 18% (4/18) |
| 56% (44/35) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 735 | Aces Total | 248 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.46 |
| 1230 | Total Double Faults | 670 |
| 1:13:21 | Average Match Time | 1:23:48 |
| 502.79 | Average Opponent Rank | 374.63 |
| 60% (11946/20017) | 1st Serve % | 65% (5456/8356) |
| 62% (7392/11946) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (3248/5456) |
| 45% (3652/8070) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1237/2900) |
| 50% (1371/2755) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (485/1026) |
| 48% (9631/20010) | Return Points Win % | 45% (3770/8302) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (120/106) | Challenger W/L | 54% (64/55) |
| 74% (151/52) | Futures W/L | 32% (7/15) |
| 63% (264/419) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (72/144) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 57% (41/72) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (11/18) |
| 50% (50/100) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (20/37) |
| 90% (271/245) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (70/60) |
| 9% (271/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (70/10) |
| 16% (158/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (75/13) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
