Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Aysegul Mert vs Vicky Van De Peer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mert vs Peer analysis and find out who is favored!
Aysegul Mert vs Vicky Van De Peer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mert has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Peer has won 43.3%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mert, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Peer has won 62.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 41.76% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mert has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peer has saved 49.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mert has won 50% of matches played (W/L 6/ 6), with Peer winning 59.46% (W/L 22/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mert has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). Peer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 13/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Mert has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5), where as Peer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65% of matches (W/L 13/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mert winning 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Mert winning 3 and Peer winning 3. The last match between Mert and Peer was at the W15 Antalya, 06-04-2023, Second, Clay with Vicky Van De Peer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:19:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mert and Peer have played a deciding set 2 times, with Mert winning 1 times and Peer 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mert winning 0, and Peer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mert has played against opponents with an average rank of 86.25 while Peer has played against players with an average rank of 169.89.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mert has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peer has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mert has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peer has converted 52.06% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mert 1 - 1 Peer
867
Rank
752
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
829
Rank
647
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
52% (33-31)
Career Total W/L
63% (108-63)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
57% (4-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Aysegul Mert | Vicky Van De Peer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
| Games Won | 26 | 27 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:19:0 | 2:19:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (136/203) | 67% (112/167) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (77/136) | 55% (62/112) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 37% (25/67) | 44% (24/55) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 52% (13/25) | 45% (14/31) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (81/167) | 50% (101/203) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Aysegul Mert
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
69 of
98)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
54 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
| 5-7 6-1 6-3 |
Stats
Aysegul Mert
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
47 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Aysegul Mert | Vicky Van De Peer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (8/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (75/71) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 6 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 20 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:30:51 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 123.86 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 68% (284/420) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (159/284) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (64/136) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (31/66) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (219/460) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (4/1) |
Aysegul Mert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 3-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Aysegul Mert
Player
Anja Petkovic
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
Player
Aysegul Mert
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
49%
(
23 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aysegul Mert
Player
Denislava Glushkova
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
11
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aysegul Mert
Player
Maria Mikhailova
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
16 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Aysegul Mert
Player
Petra Konjikusic
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Riera
Player
Aysegul Mert
46%
(
46 of
100)
1st Serve %
52%
(
45 of
87)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
11 of
42)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
45 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
49 of
87)
104
Total Points Won
83
|
6-0 6-7(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Brogan
Player
Aysegul Mert
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
79%
(
38 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aysegul Mert
Player
Nahia Berecoechea
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valeria Savinykh
Player
Aysegul Mert
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Vicky Van De Peer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lavinia Tanasie
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katarina Kozarov
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
22 of
34)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
46
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Eleejah Inisan
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
55
Total Points Won
63
|
0-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Melissa Moueza
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Aminata Sall
76%
(
95 of
125)
1st Serve %
61%
(
72 of
118)
3
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
14
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
49 of
72)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
40%
(
50 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
118)
124
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 6-7(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Nehanda Thomias
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
24 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Maklakova
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Elena Jamshidi
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Kundali Majgaine
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mert Vs Peer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
