J. Gimbrere
To Win
M. Tona
To Win
Ayla Aksu vs Jasmijn Gimbrere Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W L L W L L
Form
W L W L W W W L W LH2H: Aksu 1 - 0 Gimbrere
They have played 2 sets in total, with Aksu winning 2 and Gimbrere winning 0. The last match between Aksu and Gimbrere was at the W75 Prague, 05-05-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Ayla Aksu getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ayla Aksu | 1 |
| Jasmijn Gimbrere | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W75 Prague(05-05-2025)
Ayla Aksu
Jasmijn Gimbrere
6
4
6
0
| Aksu | Stats | Gimbrere |
|---|---|---|
| 46% (11-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (20-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 336 | Ranking | 453 |
| 214 | Highest Rank | 442 |
| 28 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 13 | Titles | 1 |
| 60% (345-234) | Career Total W/L | 55% (160-133) |
| $3,400 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Giron VS Zverev PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Humbert VS Shapovalov PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-0 |
Stats 
Ayla Aksu
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:17:18 | Average Match Time | 1:17:18 |
| 51% (29/57) | 1st Serve % | 46% (26/56) |
| 76% (22/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (13/26) |
| 36% (10/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (10/30) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (2/7) |
| 59% (33/56) | Return Points Win % | 44% (25/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Aksu vs Gimbrere Match Preview :
When evaluating recent performances, how significant is a player’s second serve? For the last six months, Aksu has clinched 38.83% of points on their second serve, whereas Gimbrere edges slightly ahead with 40.43%. Such stats are tied intricately with predicting a match's outcome. This small difference might just tilt the prediction scale, but does it decisively favor Gimbrere?
Our attention shifts to return game stats. Aksu has a slight edge, winning 55.17% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Gimbrere's 51.07%. However, when examining first serve returns, it's a tight race, with Aksu at 33.59% and Gimbrere close behind at 33.48%. Could this detail be crucial in forecasting who might dominate the rally exchanges?
How do these players hold up under pressure? Aksu has managed to save 45.45% of break points, but Gimbrere surpasses that, saving 51.62%. Is this ability to weather crucial points an indicator of Gimbrere’s potential triumph?
Looking at their yearlong performance, Aksu boasts a win rate of 58.18% from matches played, close on the heels of Gimbrere’s 57.97%. Does such parity in their win-loss records hint at an evenly matched encounter, or does it underscore a slight edge for Aksu due to their marginally superior percentage?
Surface proficiency is another facet where differences emerge. Aksu boasts a 63% career win rate on Hard courts, while Gimbrere showcases a win rate of 56% on the same surface. Both players have their struggles, with Aksu not faring well on I. hard, winning 51%, and Gimbrere coming up short on Grass with no wins. Could these surface stats weigh heavily in picking the victor?
Considering the event level, it is intriguing to note both players predominantly compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with Aksu clinching victories in 58% of his matches, narrowly surpassing Gimbrere’s 57.14%. Does this suggest a marginal preference for Aksu at this competitive level?
Analyzing opponent quality, Aksu has faced tougher opponents with an average rank of 353.36 compared to Gimbrere's 488.51. Might this mean Aksu is honed for tougher matches or simply underscores the competitive spirit of both players?
In decisive moments, Aksu prevails in 65% of deciding sets in the last year, overshadowing Gimbrere, who stands at 52%. For live match predictions, could Aksu’s decisive set dominance give them the winning edge?
When it comes to breaking serve under pressure, Aksu again excels, converting 45.45% of breakpoint chances, while Gimbrere follows with 36.11%. This ability to capitalize on crucial points might just swing the momentum, leading analysts to favor Aksu in this matchup, relying on his superior stats to see him through.
Aksu vs Gimbrere Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Ayla Aksu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Yasmine Kabbaj
Player
Ayla Aksu
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve %
80%
(
8 of
10)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
7 of
12)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
13
Total Points Won
12
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Ayla Aksu
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayla Aksu
Player
Carmen Andreea Herea
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Nilsson
Player
Ayla Aksu
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
35 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(1) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Ayla Aksu
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ayla Aksu
Player
Barbora Palicova
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
49%
(
25 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
54
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayla Aksu
Player
Julia Riera
48%
(
41 of
85)
1st Serve %
40%
(
36 of
90)
1
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
7
46%
(
19 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
53%
(
45 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
90)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ayla Aksu
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Jasmijn Gimbrere Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hanyu Guo
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
38 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Victoria Kan
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve %
44%
(
12 of
27)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
45%
(
13 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
32
Total Points Won
24
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Lisa Pigato
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Kristina Novak
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
94)
3
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
4
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
94
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Margarita Ignatjeva
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mara Guth
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
48 of
89)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (345/234) | Win/Loss | 55% (160/133) |
| 58% (757/557) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (357/313) |
| 54% (6392/5512) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3234/2987) |
| 63% (139/83) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (50/40) |
| 61% (156/101) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (79/66) |
| 50% (50/50) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (31/25) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 857 | Aces Total | 372 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 1951 | Total Double Faults | 969 |
| 1:10:59 | Average Match Time | 1:24:53 |
| 518 | Average Opponent Rank | 482.58 |
| 61% (18030/29463) | 1st Serve % | 61% (9713/15926) |
| 63% (11288/18030) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (5840/9713) |
| 44% (4995/11433) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (2694/6213) |
| 49% (1921/3929) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1032/2211) |
| 47% (14142/29921) | Return Points Win % | 47% (7584/16067) |
| 57% (4/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 9% (1/10) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 52% (151/142) | Challenger W/L | 52% (93/85) |
| 71% (189/79) | Futures W/L | 59% (67/46) |
| 60% (333/559) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (157/289) |
| 80% (4/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (59/118) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (19/46) |
| 54% (90/167) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (47/88) |
| 90% (322/290) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (149/131) |
| 9% (322/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (149/18) |
| 20% (256/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (144/28) |
Aksu vs. Gimbrere Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
