Ayana Akli vs Tessa Johanna Brockmann Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W L W W L
Form
L W L W W W L W W LHead-to-head: Akli 1 - 0 Brockmann
They have played 2 sets in total, with Akli winning 2 and Brockmann winning 0. The last match between Akli and Brockmann was at the W15 Manacor, 20-02-2025, Second, Hard with Ayana Akli getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
W15 Manacor(20-02-2025)
6
4
7
5
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Ayana Akli
Player
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
13
Games Won
9
0
Aces (Total)
2
2
Total Double Faults
3
1:46:2
Average Match Time
1:46:2
71% (42/59)
1st Serve %
64% (47/74)
79% (33/42)
1st Serve Win %
60% (28/47)
53% (9/17)
2nd Serve Win %
52% (14/27)
38% (3/8)
Break Points Won % (Total)
100% (1/1)
43% (32/74)
Return Points Win %
29% (17/59)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ayana Akli vs Tessa Johanna Brockmann Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ayana Akli 1 - 0 Tessa Johanna Brockmann
Second serve performance recent form:
In their recent matches, Akli has a second serve performance of 43.14%, while Brockmann has achieved 47.03%. This particular statistic holds a high correlation with the accuracy of predicting match outcomes.
Return game stats recent form:
Looking at the return game stats, Akli has won 56.41% of their opponent's second serve points in recent matches, while Brockmann has succeeded in 53.55% of the same situations. The first serve return stats stand at 41.9% for Akli and 38.22% for Brockmann. These numbers play a significant role in determining the favorite in their head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure analysis:
Akli has proven successful in saving 52.24% of breakpoints during their recent matches, whereas Brockmann has saved 50.87%. This statistic holds substantial value when it comes to predicting in-game betting scenarios.
Performance overview:
In the past year, Akli has emerged victorious in 58.97% of their matches (23 wins and 16 losses), while Brockmann has attained a 53.45% win rate (31 wins and 27 losses). These numbers provide an overall prediction overview for their head-to-head encounter.
Best surface:
On the Hard surface, Akli boasts a career win percentage of 69% (24 wins and 11 losses), making it their most successful surface. Conversely, Akli's least favorable surface is Clay, where they have won only 42% of matches (5 wins and 7 losses). For Brockmann, their highest career win percentage comes on the Hard surface at 60% (18 wins and 12 losses), while their worst surface is I.hard, where they have won 45% of matches (5 wins and 6 losses).
Player level:
Over the past year, Akli has primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a prize money greater than $10K. Their success rate in these tournaments stands at 58.33% (21 wins and 15 losses). Similarly, Brockmann has also participated mainly in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a prize money greater than $10K, achieving a win rate of 58.33% (21 wins and 15 losses). When comparing player statistics to predict the favorite, it is crucial to consider the competitive level of the events they have been involved in.
Opponent quality stats:
During the last 12 months, Akli has faced opponents with an average rank of 349.9, while Brockmann has competed against players with an average rank of 327.57.
Deciding set performance vs all players:
For those interested in live predictions and betting, it is worth noting that Akli has triumphed in 50% of deciding sets played over the past year, while Brockmann has emerged victorious in 53% of all their matches on the tour.
Current event H2H stats:
Past player performance provides valuable insights when predicting tennis matches. However, once an event is underway, current event stats play a crucial role in indicating the form of the players. Please refer to the section below (if available) to examine the players' performance in the ongoing event. It is also important to consider that some players may excel at specific events, which should also be taken into account when making outcome predictions.
Break point conversion:
In their recent matches, Akli has successfully converted 50.39% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Brockmann has achieved a conversion rate of 50% when presented with chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic is particularly insightful for live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article could serve as an excellent starting point. (Warning: Intended for stat enthusiasts).
Ayana Akli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Podrez
Player
Ayana Akli
74%
(
82 of
111)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
41%
(
45 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
103
Total Points Won
96
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ayana Akli
Player
Katarina Stresnakova
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayana Akli
Player
Linda Salvi
82%
(
53 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Monika Ekstrand
Player
Ayana Akli
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve %
83%
(
40 of
48)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
100%
(
13 of
13)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
4 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
46
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ayana Akli
Player
Georgina Groth
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayana Akli
Player
Leana Nannapaneni
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
43%
(
18 of
42)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Abbagnato
Player
Ayana Akli
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ayana Akli
Player
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayana Akli
Player
Malkia Menguene
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
24 of
35)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
52
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Noelia Bouzo Zanotti
Player
Ayana Akli
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
75%
(
64 of
85)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tessa Johanna Brockmann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
49 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
7-5 6-7(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
Player
Monika Ekstrand
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Britt Du Pree
Player
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
1
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
Player
Loes Ebeling Koning
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
91)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
103
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
Player
Alice Robbe
63%
(
66 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
52%
(
54 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
6-1 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
Player
Sara Dols
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ayana Akli
Player
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
Player
Leny Bollmann
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
11
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Milatova
Player
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
62% (39/24)
Win/Loss
55% (47/39)
61% (88/57)
Sets Win/Loss
54% (106/90)
55% (721/597)
Games Win/Loss
52% (965/899)
68% (27/13)
Hard Win/Loss
60% (21/14)
42% (5/7)
Clay Win/Loss
51% (19/18)
64% (7/4)
Indoor Hard W/L
50% (7/7)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.12
Aces Per Game
0.14
77
Aces Total
127
0.27
Double Faults Per Game
0.31
177
Total Double Faults
286
1:34:42
Average Match Time
1:27:48
390.05
Average Opponent Rank
339.98
67% (2605/3865)
1st Serve %
59% (2893/4937)
62% (1606/2605)
1st Serve Win %
61% (1768/2893)
46% (581/1260)
2nd Serve Win %
47% (952/2044)
50% (260/519)
Break Points Won % (Total)
49% (266/544)
48% (1802/3789)
Return Points Win %
45% (2140/4743)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
62% (32/20)
Challenger W/L
52% (23/21)
64% (7/4)
Futures W/L
57% (24/18)
62% (39/63)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
57% (47/83)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
50% (5/10)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
68% (17/25)
47% (9/19)
Deciding Set Win %
56% (14/25)
83% (41/34)
1st Set Won, Won Match
87% (45/39)
17% (41/7)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
13% (45/6)
23% (22/5)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
20% (41/8)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
