F. Crawley
To Win
A. Markham
To Win
Ayana Akli vs Fiona Crawley Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W W W W L
Form
L L W W W L W L W WHead-2-Head: Akli 1 - 0 Crawley
They have played 3 sets in total, with Akli winning 2 and Crawley winning 1. The last match between Akli and Crawley was at the W35 Bethany Beach, 17-05-2025, Round: Semifinals, Surface: Clay, with Ayana Akli getting the victory 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ayana Akli | 1 |
| Fiona Crawley | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Bethany Beach(17-05-2025)
Ayana Akli
Fiona Crawley
4
6
7
6
6
3
| Akli | Stats | Crawley |
|---|---|---|
| 73% (38-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (15-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 315 | Ranking | 566 |
| 315 | Highest Rank | 348 |
| 23 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 3 |
| 68% (66-31) | Career Total W/L | 66% (57-30) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $81,500 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
13 Jun 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bergs VS Lajal PREDICTION Grass
Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch atp
13 Jun 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Diallo VS Humbert PREDICTION Grass
Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch atp
14 Jun 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Stats 
Ayana Akli
Player
Fiona Crawley
76%
(
78 of
103)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
109)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
51 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
56 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 15 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 3:6:50 | Average Match Time | 3:6:50 |
| 76% (78/103) | 1st Serve % | 71% (77/109) |
| 56% (44/78) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (42/77) |
| 32% (8/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (11/32) |
| 50% (9/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (8/17) |
| 51% (56/109) | Return Points Win % | 50% (51/103) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Akli vs Crawley Match Preview :
- Which player recently performed better on their second serve? Akli marginally edges out Crawley, winning 37.37% while Crawley has secured 37.3% of points on their second serve.
- How do they compare when returning serves? Crawley has the upper hand, winning 53.17% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Akli's 47.04%. Crawley also leads in first serve returns with 38.02%, slightly better than Akli's 34.35%.
- Assessing their ability under pressure, Akli has saved 47.63% of breakpoints, slightly more than Crawley's 46.89%.
- Looking at overall match performance in the last year, Akli has a higher win rate at 67.53%, with a record of 52 wins and 25 losses, while Crawley stands at 57.89%, winning 22 matches and losing 16.
- On their preferred surface, both players excel on hard courts, but Crawley is slightly superior with a 71% win rate compared to Akli's 70%.
- Considering the level of competition they faced, Crawley's opponents have been of higher caliber, with an average rank of 235.05 compared to Akli's 404.05.
- In deciding sets, Akli shows stronger resilience, securing victories in 58% of such scenarios, while Crawley has a 43% win rate.
- In terms of break point conversion in recent form, Akli is slightly better at 42.08% compared to Crawley's 41.96% success rate.
Editorial Prediction (May 17, 2025, UTC):
In evaluating the upcoming match between Akli and Crawley, several factors emerge that could dictate the outcome. Both players show comparable prowess in their second serve performance, though Akli has a minimal advantage.
Crawley has demonstrated superior return stats, particularly in both first and second serves, which is crucial for gaining control of the match. However, Akli's ability to save breakpoints slightly better and his resilience in deciding sets enhance his potential to clinch critical moments in the game.
While Crawley has competed against higher-ranked opponents and holds a marginal edge on hard courts, Akli's higher match win rate and breakpoint conversion suggest strong competitive form.
Considering all these factors, the match is poised to be closely contested. Nevertheless, Akli's consistency in pressure situations and overall match resilience make him the likely winner of this encounter.
Akli vs Crawley Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Ayana Akli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Darja Vidmanova
Player
Ayana Akli
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
76%
(
86 of
113)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
113)
106
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayana Akli
Player
Jada Robinson
71%
(
71 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
105)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
105)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ayana Akli
Player
Ana Sofia Sanchez
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ayana Akli
Player
Fiona Crawley
76%
(
78 of
103)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
109)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
51 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
56 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ayana Akli
Player
Despina Papamichail
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ayana Akli
Player
Zoe Hitt
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayana Akli
Player
Kayla Day
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
44
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Monika Ekstrand
Player
Ayana Akli
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Fiona Crawley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Mckenna Schaefbauer
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
43%
(
13 of
30)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
41
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Michaela Eddins
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve %
68%
(
15 of
22)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
19 of
22)
37
Total Points Won
10
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kristina Liutova
Player
Fiona Crawley
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Theadora Rabman
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ayana Akli
Player
Fiona Crawley
76%
(
78 of
103)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
109)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
51 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
56 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Alexis Nguyen
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve %
61%
(
22 of
36)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
50%
(
8 of
16)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
44%
(
12 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
37
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Kallista Liu
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
80%
(
32 of
40)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
19 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
48
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Sumvruta Iyengar
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68% (66/31) | Win/Loss | 66% (57/30) |
| 65% (143/76) | Sets Win/Loss | 63% (126/75) |
| 56% (1116/861) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (1012/795) |
| 69% (36/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 72% (43/17) |
| 68% (23/11) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (7/9) |
| 64% (7/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (7/4) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 96 | Aces Total | 51 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 240 | Total Double Faults | 233 |
| 1:34:29 | Average Match Time | 1:33:35 |
| 412.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 438.15 |
| 68% (3986/5833) | 1st Serve % | 67% (3206/4804) |
| 62% (2459/3986) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (1894/3206) |
| 47% (866/1847) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (715/1598) |
| 51% (405/794) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (360/704) |
| 49% (2765/5688) | Return Points Win % | 50% (2437/4872) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 69% (59/27) | Challenger W/L | 63% (40/24) |
| 64% (7/4) | Futures W/L | 78% (14/4) |
| 68% (66/97) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (57/87) |
| 56% (10/18) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (8/16) |
| 56% (14/25) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (15/27) |
| 88% (64/56) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (55/50) |
| 13% (64/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (55/5) |
| 30% (33/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (32/7) |
Akli vs. Crawley Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
