Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Austin Krajicek vs Jarryd Chaplin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krajicek vs Chaplin analysis and find out who is favored!
Austin Krajicek vs Jarryd Chaplin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krajicek has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Chaplin has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krajicek, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chaplin has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krajicek has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chaplin has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krajicek has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Chaplin winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krajicek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 196/ 144), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 9/ 16). Chaplin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 66/ 58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Krajicek winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Krajicek winning 2 and Chaplin winning 0. The last match between Krajicek and Chaplin was at the Drummondville Challenger, 12-03-2017, Q1 round, I.hard with Austin Krajicek getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:55:1.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krajicek and Chaplin have played a deciding set 0 times, with Krajicek winning 0 times and Chaplin 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Krajicek winning 0, and Chaplin 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krajicek has played against opponents with an average rank of while Chaplin has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krajicek has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chaplin has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krajicek has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chaplin has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Krajicek 1 - 0 Chaplin
Ret.
Rank
94
High
33
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
824
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
56% (281-224)
Career Total W/L
51% (73-71)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$320,031
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Austin Krajicek | Jarryd Chaplin |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:55:1 | 0:55:1 |
| 1st Serve % | 80% (32/40) | 58% (37/64) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 91% (29/32) | 73% (27/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 88% (7/8) | 33% (9/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (28/64) | 10% (4/40) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Austin Krajicek
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
5
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
3
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Austin Krajicek | Jarryd Chaplin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Austin Krajicek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Luis Patino
Player
Austin Krajicek
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Austin Krajicek
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
13
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
30 of
36)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
13 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
18 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Collin Altamirano
Player
Austin Krajicek
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
13
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
6
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Austin Krajicek
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Austin Krajicek
Player
Tiran Sanghera
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
41%
(
26 of
64)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
9
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Austin Krajicek
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
10
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Ignacio Londero
Player
Austin Krajicek
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
9
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
87
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Austin Krajicek
Player
Gonzalo Escobar
55%
(
62 of
112)
1st Serve %
69%
(
90 of
131)
18
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
84%
(
52 of
62)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
64 of
90)
50%
(
25 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
35 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
131)
124
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Austin Krajicek
Player
Alexios Halebian
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Austin Krajicek
Player
Shalva Dzhanashia
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jarryd Chaplin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Bradley Mousley
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
12
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
16 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jarryd Chaplin
Player
Jianhui Li
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adam El Mihdawy
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
40%
(
14 of
35)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jarryd Chaplin
Player
Christopher Rosensteel
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fabiano De Paula
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sekou Bangoura
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jarryd Chaplin
Player
Mark Oljaca
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Austin Krajicek
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
5
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
3
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Krajicek Vs Chaplin Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
