Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen vs Jasmijn Gimbrere Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W W L W L
Form
W L W W W L W L W LH2H: Olsen 2 - 0 Gimbrere
They have played 6 sets in total, with Olsen winning 4 and Gimbrere winning 2. The last match between Olsen and Gimbrere was at the W35 Santa Margherita di Pula, 01-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen getting the victory 7-6(5) 2-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen | 2 |
| Jasmijn Gimbrere | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Santa Margherita di Pula(01-05-2025)
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
Jasmijn Gimbrere
7
6
2
6
6
4
| Olsen | Stats | Gimbrere |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (16-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (21-17) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 784 | Ranking | 453 |
| 784 | Highest Rank | 442 |
| 25 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 57% (112-83) | Career Total W/L | 55% (161-134) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dzumhur VS Rinderknech PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Diallo VS Clar PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
63%
(
74 of
117)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
10
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
33%
(
14 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
59 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
114
|
||||
| 6-3 4-6 11-9 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 36 | Games Won | 34 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:35:10 | Average Match Time | 1:35:10 |
| 63% (74/117) | 1st Serve % | 58% (60/103) |
| 59% (44/74) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (36/60) |
| 33% (14/43) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (19/43) |
| 54% (7/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (8/19) |
| 47% (48/103) | Return Points Win % | 50% (59/117) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Olsen vs Gimbrere Match Preview :
As we delve into this fascinating showdown, let's explore the intricacies of this matchup through some compelling statistics. When analyzing second serve performance over the past six months, Olsen has secured 31.65% of points with their second serve, while Gimbrere boasts a superior 40.15%. How crucial is this edge in predicting the match's outcome?
In the realm of return games, Olsen appears to have the upper hand, winning 52.05% of points on their opponent's second serve, slightly edging out Gimbrere's 50%. Meanwhile, for first serve returns, Olsen triumphs with a 36.11% success rate over Gimbrere's 33.05%. Could these figures hint at a possible advantage in this head-to-head encounter?
Pressure situations are a litmus test for mental fortitude. Olsen has managed to save 41.86% of breakpoints recently, whereas Gimbrere shines with a more impressive 51.31%. Will this statistic play a pivotal role in the heat of battle?
Reflecting on their performance over the past year, Olsen has achieved a win rate of 59.62% across all matches, compared to Gimbrere's 58.21%. These numbers are strikingly close. However, let's dig deeper by considering their best career surfaces—Olsen's strongest surface is clay with a 62% win rate, while Gimbrere excels on hard courts with a 56% win percentage. Could the playing surface be the deciding factor in this clash?
An overview of their competitive levels reveals that Olsen has mainly competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K level with a win percentage of 53.33%. In contrast, Gimbrere has consistently played at the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K level, achieving a 57.41% success rate. Does playing at different levels offer potential insight into their competitive edge?
Turning our attention to their direct encounters, Olsen has triumphed in their sole past meeting, besting Gimbrere at the W 15 Alkmaar in a thrilling three-set battle. Olsen prevailed 6-3, 4-6, 11-9 on clay. Given this history, what do these head-to-head statistics suggest about the upcoming match?
Considering opponent quality, Olsen has faced adversaries with an average rank of 357.83 over the last twelve months, while Gimbrere's opponents have averaged a rank of 491.03. Will facing higher-ranked opponents give Olsen an edge in experience?
If this match reaches a deciding set, both players have shown commendable resilience with Olsen winning 54% and Gimbrere 55% in deciding set scenarios over the last year. Who has the staying power if it goes the distance?
Finally, examining break point conversions, Olsen has seized 43.04% of opportunities lately, while Gimbrere has converted 36.16% of chances. This is a critical factor for live betting scenarios as a single break can change the match dynamics. Based on a comprehensive analysis of these stats, Olsen seems to carry a slight edge heading into this captivating matchup. Who will ultimately emerge victorious? The pieces may favor Olsen to come out on top.
Olsen vs Gimbrere Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
Player
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
Player
Emily Sartz-Lunde
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
51%
(
22 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
55
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Georgia Andreea Craciun
Player
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
74%
(
60 of
81)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
Player
Victoria Rodriguez
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
78%
(
61 of
78)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
41%
(
27 of
66)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
19 of
61)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
92%
(
11 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
60%
(
56 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
51 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
Player
Cindy Langlais
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Nadia Kulbiej
Player
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
Player
Fanny Norin
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Jasmijn Gimbrere Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Yuki Naito
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Miriana Tona
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hanyu Guo
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
38 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Victoria Kan
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve %
44%
(
12 of
27)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
45%
(
13 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
32
Total Points Won
24
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Lisa Pigato
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Kristina Novak
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
94)
3
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
4
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
94
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Margarita Ignatjeva
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (112/83) | Win/Loss | 55% (161/134) |
| 56% (250/196) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (359/316) |
| 53% (2140/1896) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3256/3009) |
| 43% (13/17) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (50/40) |
| 62% (90/56) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (80/67) |
| 47% (9/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (31/25) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 131 | Aces Total | 378 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 369 | Total Double Faults | 973 |
| 1:8:34 | Average Match Time | 1:25:9 |
| 423.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 482.53 |
| 66% (5595/8466) | 1st Serve % | 61% (9805/16076) |
| 56% (3132/5595) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (5895/9805) |
| 41% (1170/2871) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (2717/6271) |
| 53% (588/1109) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1039/2223) |
| 48% (4055/8389) | Return Points Win % | 47% (7639/16194) |
| 100% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 58% (34/25) | Challenger W/L | 52% (94/86) |
| 57% (77/58) | Futures W/L | 59% (67/46) |
| 57% (112/195) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (158/291) |
| 53% (18/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (19/46) |
| 54% (30/56) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (48/89) |
| 91% (108/98) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (149/131) |
| 9% (108/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (149/18) |
| 16% (87/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (146/29) |
Olsen vs. Gimbrere Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
