Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen vs Cindy Langlais Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W L W L L
Form
L W W L W L L W L LH2H: Olsen 1 - 0 Langlais
They have played 2 sets in total, with Olsen winning 2 and Langlais winning 0. The last match between Olsen and Langlais was at the W35 Bol, 27-05-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen | 1 |
| Cindy Langlais | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Bol(27-05-2025)
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
Cindy Langlais
6
4
6
3
| Olsen | Stats | Langlais |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (16-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (9-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 773 | Ranking | N/A |
| 773 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 26 | Age | 16 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (112-84) | Career Total W/L | 51% (18-17) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cazaux VS Basilashvili PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
13 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Passaro VS Bueno PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
13 Jul 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
Player
Cindy Langlais
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:45:36 | Average Match Time | 1:45:36 |
| 62% (36/58) | 1st Serve % | 69% (44/64) |
| 64% (23/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (23/44) |
| 59% (13/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (10/20) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (2/8) |
| 48% (31/64) | Return Points Win % | 38% (22/58) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Olsen vs Langlais Match Preview :
- Olsen's second serve performance is weaker, winning 35.98% of points compared to Langlais who secures 42.46%. Does this suggest Langlais might have an edge on the serve? Yes, given the high correlation with match prediction accuracy.
- When it comes to returning, Olsen excels by winning 53.07% of their opponent's second serve points, surpassing Langlais who wins 48.99%.
- First serve return stats are quite close, with Langlais slightly ahead, winning 37.79% versus Olsen's 37.02%.
- Langlais shows superior breakpoint defense, saving 47.54% of breakpoints, compared to Olsen's 42.93%. Could this impact their ability to handle pressure? Likely, yes.
- Overall, Olsen has a higher win percentage over the last year, winning 60% of matches compared to Langlais' 55.56%.
- Olsen dominates on Clay surfaces (62% win rate), whereas Langlais is more proficient on Hard courts (71% win rate).
- Both players often compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Langlais slightly leading by winning 59.09% of matches compared to Olsen's 54.29%.
- Langlais faced tougher opponents on average, playing against those ranked 163.26, whereas Olsen's average opponent was ranked 344.35.
- In deciding sets, Olsen holds the advantage, winning 53% of such matches versus Langlais' 44%.
- Langlais is more efficient in converting breakpoints, achieving a 44.87% conversion rate, while Olsen has a 37.06% rate.
Editorial Prediction (May 27, 2025, UTC):
In analysing the head-to-head statistics, Olsen appears to hold a slight edge in return performance, particularly on the second serve, which could prove decisive if Langlais struggles with service consistency. While Olsen has shown commendable performance on clay surfaces, this advantage might be neutralized if the match is on a hard court where Langlais excels.
Langlais, meanwhile, has faced higher-ranked opponents and has a superior record at converting breakpoints and conserving advantages when under pressure. This could be crucial in key moments during the match, tipping the scale in their favor.
Given the higher pressure-handling abilities and efficiency on fast courts displayed by Langlais, it's predicted that Langlais is most likely to win this upcoming tennis match, especially if the venue favors a hard surface.
Olsen vs Langlais Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
Player
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
Player
Emily Sartz-Lunde
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
51%
(
22 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
55
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Georgia Andreea Craciun
Player
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
74%
(
60 of
81)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
Player
Victoria Rodriguez
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
78%
(
61 of
78)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
41%
(
27 of
66)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
19 of
61)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
92%
(
11 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
60%
(
56 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
51 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
Player
Cindy Langlais
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Nadia Kulbiej
Player
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Cindy Langlais Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Amelie Van Impe
Player
Cindy Langlais
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
Player
Cindy Langlais
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 3-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Cindy Langlais
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilla Rosatello
Player
Cindy Langlais
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cindy Langlais
Player
Manon Leonard
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alice Robbe
Player
Cindy Langlais
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
2
Aces
0
13
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
52%
(
44 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
54 of
99)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (112/84) | Win/Loss | 51% (18/17) |
| 56% (250/198) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (41/39) |
| 53% (2143/1908) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (399/392) |
| 43% (13/17) | Hard Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) |
| 61% (90/57) | Clay Win/Loss | 46% (13/15) |
| 47% (9/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 131 | Aces Total | 4 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 369 | Total Double Faults | 45 |
| 1:8:13 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 422.06 | Average Opponent Rank | 80.69 |
| 66% (5595/8466) | 1st Serve % | 68% (880/1299) |
| 56% (3132/5595) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (459/880) |
| 41% (1170/2871) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (204/419) |
| 53% (588/1109) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (76/160) |
| 48% (4055/8389) | Return Points Win % | 46% (582/1255) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (34/26) | Challenger W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 57% (77/58) | Futures W/L | 55% (16/13) |
| 57% (112/196) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (18/35) |
| 53% (18/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (4/7) |
| 54% (30/56) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (5/10) |
| 91% (108/98) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (17/15) |
| 9% (108/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (17/2) |
| 16% (88/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (18/3) |
Olsen vs. Langlais Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
