Astrid Lew Yan Foon vs Tina Nadine Smith Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L W L W L
Form
L W L W L L W L L LHead-To-Head: Foon 1 - 0 Smith
They have played 1 sets in total, with Foon winning 1 and Smith winning 0. The last match between Foon and Smith was at the W35 Bastad, 13-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Astrid Lew Yan Foon getting the victory 6-3 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Astrid Lew Yan Foon | 1 |
| Tina Nadine Smith | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Bastad(13-05-2025)
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
Tina Nadine Smith
6
3
| Foon | Stats | Smith |
|---|---|---|
| 67% (26-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 41% (12-17) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 489 | Ranking | 317 |
| 489 | Highest Rank | 266 |
| 19 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 1 |
| 58% (96-69) | Career Total W/L | 56% (186-148) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $1,915 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Begu VS Cristian PREDICTION Clay
UniCredit Iasi Open - Iasi wta
19 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Hon VS Kulikova PREDICTION Hard
Prague Open - Prague wta
19 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 ret. |
Stats 
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
48%
(
12 of
25)
1st Serve %
54%
(
15 of
28)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
92%
(
11 of
12)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
9 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
31
Total Points Won
22
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 6 | Games Won | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 0:45:40 | Average Match Time | 0:45:40 |
| 48% (12/25) | 1st Serve % | 54% (15/28) |
| 92% (11/12) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (7/15) |
| 38% (5/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (6/13) |
| 100% (3/3) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 54% (15/28) | Return Points Win % | 36% (9/25) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Foon vs Smith Match Preview :
- Foon's second serve points win rate is slightly higher than Smith's, at 42.59% compared to 42.11%. Could this marginal advantage in second serve effectiveness sway the match in Foon's favor?
- Looking at return stats, Foon narrowly leads in winning second serve return points with 51.81%, as opposed to Smith's 51.05%.
- Conversely, Smith has a slight edge in returning first serves, achieving a 34.3% win rate, compared to Foon's 32.25%.
- Under pressure, Foon has demonstrated greater resilience, saving 47.68% of break points versus Smith's 42.01%. Could this ability to handle critical points tilt the balance towards Foon?
- Overall match performance over the past year favors Foon slightly, with a 65.22% win rate compared to Smith's 60%.
- Surface preference shows Foon excels on Hard courts with a 64% win rate, while Smith prefers Grass, winning 62% of matches there. Could the playing surface be decisive in this matchup?
- Both players have competed in primarily Challengers/ITF tournaments >$10K, exhibiting comparable win rates of around 61% each.
- Smith has faced slightly stronger opponents, with an average opponent ranking of 421.61 over the last year, compared to Foon's 427.02.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Foon has a significant advantage, winning 71% of deciding sets, while Smith has managed 47%.
- In terms of break point conversion, Foon has converted 38.71% against Smith's 35.84%. Will Foon's efficiency in capitalizing on break points give them an upper hand?
Editorial Prediction (May 13, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming clash between Foon and Smith presents an intriguing battle of nuanced strengths and vulnerabilities. Foon's slight advantage in second serve points won and break point conversion hints at a possible edge.
Smith's superiority in returning first serves and encountering stronger competition might offer resilience but is counterbalanced by Foon's ability to prevail in deciding sets and handle pressure during crucial break points.
The surface condition favors Foon if played on Hard, while Smith might feel more at ease on Grass. However, given their near-equal performance in similar competitive settings, the outcome is poised to be closely contested.
In light of these comparative strengths and recent performance trends, Foon appears to have a modest overall advantage and is slightly more likely to emerge victorious in this encounter.
Foon vs Smith Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Astrid Lew Yan Foon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Vivian Wolff
Player
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
17 of
30)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
45
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
Player
Victoria Pohle
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
35)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
51%
(
39 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
Player
Aravane Rezai
31%
(
5 of
16)
1st Serve %
54%
(
14 of
26)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
28
Total Points Won
14
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
46%
(
41 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
97
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
Player
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
Player
Bertille Landry
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
57%
(
12 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caroline Werner
Player
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve %
43%
(
13 of
30)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
41
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tina Nadine Smith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mia Ristic
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
37 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
103)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Angela Fita Boluda
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Loes Ebeling Koning
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
52%
(
50 of
96)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tiphanie Lemaitre
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eleejah Inisan
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve %
71%
(
25 of
35)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
50%
(
8 of
16)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
48%
(
12 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
34
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Emeline Dartron
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marie Vogt
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
100
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (96/69) | Win/Loss | 56% (186/148) |
| 55% (199/166) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (417/343) |
| 53% (1736/1550) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3646/3271) |
| 64% (37/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (44/44) |
| 58% (47/34) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (119/88) |
| 46% (12/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (15/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 349 | Aces Total | 429 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 484 | Total Double Faults | 756 |
| 1:26:53 | Average Match Time | 1:34:58 |
| 410.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 445.31 |
| 58% (5628/9628) | 1st Serve % | 62% (11881/19175) |
| 61% (3409/5628) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (7302/11881) |
| 45% (1795/4000) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3448/7294) |
| 49% (593/1211) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1108/2305) |
| 46% (4319/9326) | Return Points Win % | 45% (8505/18751) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 14% (1/6) |
| 58% (56/41) | Challenger W/L | 55% (138/112) |
| 61% (40/26) | Futures W/L | 62% (47/29) |
| 58% (90/156) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (184/330) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 43% (10/23) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (31/63) |
| 71% (30/42) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (48/94) |
| 92% (89/82) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (189/166) |
| 8% (89/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (189/23) |
| 18% (76/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (145/20) |
Foon vs. Smith Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
