A. Sharma
To Win
L. R. Gormaz
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W W W L WForm
L L W W L W W W L LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Sharma winning 2 and Cirez winning 1. The last match between Sharma and Cirez was at the W35 Sabadell, 23-03-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Clay, with Astra Sharma getting the victory 6-4 2-6 10-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Astra Sharma | 1 |
Carlota Martinez Cirez | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Sabadell(23-03-2025)
Sharma | Stats | Cirez |
---|---|---|
68% (25-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 40% (10-15) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
149 | Ranking | 222 |
84 | Highest Rank | 203 |
29 | Age | 24 |
R | Plays | - |
11 | Titles | 7 |
59% (264-183) | Career Total W/L | 61% (228-148) |
$828,496 | Career Prize Money | $11,820 |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
22 May 2025 / Q2 round
Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat wta
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
French Open - Paris atp
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 2-6 10-4 |
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
18 | Games Won | 14 |
0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When it comes to recent second serve performance, the numbers reveal an intriguing edge for Sharma. Over the past six months, she has secured 42.48% of points from her second serve, whereas Cirez trails with 38.51%. With a strong correlation between effective second serves and match predictions, could Sharma have the upper hand here?
Examining return game statistics, Cirez edges ahead of Sharma in challenging her opponent's second serve, capturing 49.41% compared to Sharma's 48.37%. Furthermore, Cirez excels in first serve returns with a 38.01% success rate against Sharma’s 30.44%. These statistics suggest that Cirez's return game might be pivotal in determining the favorite for this head-to-head battle.
Facing pressure, Sharma has demonstrated resilience by saving 53.31% of breakpoints in recent times, while Cirez has saved a slightly lower 47.76%. Such data is critical for in-game betting where every point counts under high-pressure situations.
From a broader performance perspective, Cirez has enjoyed a formidable win rate of 62.35% over the last year, significantly overshadowing Sharma’s 42.11%. This includes respective records of 53 wins out of 85 for Cirez and 24 wins out of 57 for Sharma, adding a significant piece to the predictive puzzle.
Their affinity for certain surfaces adds another layer of analysis. Both players show a preference for clay courts, with Sharma winning 61% of her matches and Cirez not far ahead at 63%. However, Sharma struggles on grass with a 45% win rate, whereas Cirez finds challenges on indoor hard courts with only a 25% victory rate.
Regarding the competitive level, Sharma and Cirez have both predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments above $10K, with Cirez achieving a stronger win percentage of 62.65% compared to Sharma’s 39.39%. This stat highlights the level of experience and success Cirez brings into their engagements.
Quality of opposition also provides insight. Sharma has faced opponents with a higher average ranking of 208.21 over the past year, compared to Cirez’s opponents averaging a rank of 298.18. This difference might challenge Cirez to match Sharma’s readiness against more competitively ranked players.
Deciding set performance could play a pivotal role, with Cirez winning 57% of such scenarios compared to Sharma’s 43%. This suggests that Cirez might possess the mental edge to thrive in potential high-stakes moments.
Converting breakpoints can often tilt the match in a player’s favor, and Cirez excels with a conversion rate of 50.95%, markedly superior to Sharma’s 37.42%. Such effectiveness in capitalizing on opportunities underscores Cirez as a formidable competitor eager to seize every chance.
Considering these comprehensive insights, the prediction leans toward Cirez as the likely winner, armed with statistical advantages in crucial areas like return games, overall match performance, and breakpoint conversion. Sharma, though competitive, may find it challenging to overcome Cirez's robust and versatile game in this anticipated contest.
Sharma vs Cirez Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Astra Sharma
Player
Emina Bektas
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve %
66%
(
23 of
35)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
49
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Renata Jamrichova
Player
Astra Sharma
70%
(
88 of
125)
1st Serve %
71%
(
79 of
111)
2
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
1
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
46 of
79)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
46%
(
58 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
111)
118
Total Points Won
118
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Astra Sharma
Player
Valeriya Strakhova
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
49%
(
38 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Astra Sharma
Player
Ivana Sebestova
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Astra Sharma
Player
Whitney Osuigwe
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Astra Sharma
Player
Katarina Jokic
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
31 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Astra Sharma
Player
Iryna Shymanovich
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
3
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Astra Sharma
Player
Maria Kozyreva
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
74
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Jenny Duerst
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
12 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
51
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Carlota Martinez Cirez
Player
Joelle Steur
73%
(
82 of
112)
1st Serve %
88%
(
110 of
125)
0
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
0
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
53 of
110)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
47%
(
53 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
63 of
125)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Carlota Martinez Cirez
Player
Sylvie Zund
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
70%
(
14 of
20)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
37%
(
10 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
30
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Carlota Martinez Cirez
Player
Meritxell Teixido Garcia
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Carlota Martinez Cirez
Player
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Carlota Martinez Cirez
Player
Ajla Tomljanovic
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59% (264/183) | Win/Loss | 61% (228/148) |
57% (590/439) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (500/346) |
53% (5003/4361) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4065/3469) |
58% (141/103) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (14/14) |
63% (107/62) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (212/130) |
50% (7/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) |
45% (9/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
1130 | Aces Total | 149 |
0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
1223 | Total Double Faults | 1189 |
1:24:38 | Average Match Time | 1:40:20 |
210.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 468.07 |
61% (16292/26525) | 1st Serve % | 65% (14387/22124) |
65% (10577/16292) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (8325/14387) |
48% (4943/10233) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (3368/7737) |
47% (1492/3197) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (1681/3175) |
44% (12020/27308) | Return Points Win % | 50% (11057/22222) |
51% (25/24) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) |
39% (9/14) | Masters W/L | 17% (1/5) |
50% (47/47) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
62% (138/85) | Challenger W/L | 60% (164/110) |
78% (45/13) | Futures W/L | 68% (63/30) |
60% (261/437) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (225/371) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
54% (49/91) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (29/50) |
57% (82/145) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (52/97) |
84% (253/213) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (221/196) |
15% (253/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (221/25) |
27% (194/53) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (155/32) |