Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Asia Muhammad vs Louisa Chirico Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Muhammad vs Chirico analysis and find out who is favored!
Asia Muhammad vs Louisa Chirico Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Muhammad has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Chirico has won 45.65%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Muhammad, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chirico has won 54.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 38.76% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Muhammad has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chirico has saved 49.75% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Muhammad has won 59.09% of matches played (W/L 13/ 9), with Chirico winning 50% (W/L 30/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Muhammad has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 226/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 13/ 20). Chirico has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 143/ 91), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Muhammad has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.71% of matches (W/L 11/ 6), where as Chirico has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.08% of matches (W/L 25/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Muhammad has played against opponents with an average rank of 215.41 while Chirico has played against players with an average rank of 224.65.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Muhammad has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chirico has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Muhammad has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chirico has converted 49.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Muhammad 0 - 0 Chirico
462
Rank
124
High
33
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
283
Rank
58
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
54% (316-270)
Career Total W/L
56% (291-230)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
44% (8-10)
$286,274
Career Prize Money
$623,285
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Asia Muhammad | Louisa Chirico |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (8/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (19/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (202/203) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 38 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.43 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 84 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:51:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 197.56 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (844/1344) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (503/844) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (237/500) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 51% (76/148) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (583/1311) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 47% (8/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (8/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Asia Muhammad Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Leylah Annie Fernandez
Player
Asia Muhammad
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
87 of
120)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
51 of
87)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
21%
(
5 of
24)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
120)
106
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Victoria Rodriguez
62%
(
68 of
110)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
47 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Asia Muhammad
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Asia Muhammad
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
0
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Leticia Garcia Vidal
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
100%
(
18 of
18)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Sohyun Park
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve %
61%
(
19 of
31)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
5 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
34
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Amarni Banks
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Anna Brogan
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Katarina Stresnakova
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
105)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Louisa Chirico Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Ashton Bowers
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
49%
(
28 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Louisa Chirico
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
13
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Louisa Chirico
74%
(
78 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
120)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
46 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
120)
117
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Louisa Chirico
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
20%
(
4 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Maria Bondarenko
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Louisa Chirico
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Louisa Chirico
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maribella Zamarripa
Player
Louisa Chirico
73%
(
84 of
115)
1st Serve %
58%
(
63 of
109)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
45 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
109)
119
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(4) 7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Louisa Chirico
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Ava Markham
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Muhammad Vs Chirico Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Louisa Chirico
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
