Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Prediction of Ashton Bowers vs Sarah Hamner Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bowers vs Hamner analysis and find out who is favored!
Ashton Bowers vs Sarah Hamner Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bowers 1 - 0 Hamner
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bowers has won 40.85% of points on their second serve, while Hamner has won 59.09%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bowers, in recent form, has won 49.24% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hamner has won 52.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.14% and 35.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bowers has saved 55.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hamner has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bowers has won 53.66% of matches played (W/L 22/ 19), with Hamner winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bowers has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 10/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 6/ 10). Hamner has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Bowers has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 13), where as Hamner has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bowers winning 1 times and Hamner being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bowers winning 2 and Hamner winning 0. The last match between Bowers and Hamner was at the W75 Sumter, 03-06-2024, Q1 round, Hard with Ashton Bowers getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bowers and Hamner have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bowers winning 0 times and Hamner 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bowers winning 0, and Hamner 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bowers has played against opponents with an average rank of 401.61 while Hamner has played against players with an average rank of 682.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bowers has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hamner has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bowers has converted 43.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hamner has converted 20% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
682
Rank
681
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
49% (22-23)
Career Total W/L
35% (6-11)
52% (17-16)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Ashton Bowers vs Sarah Hamner For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Bowers VS Hamner
| stats | Ashton Bowers | Sarah Hamner |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| DFs Total | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:0 | 1:44:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (45/66) | 67% (45/67) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (29/45) | 47% (21/45) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (10/21) | 59% (13/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 20% (2/10) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (33/67) | 41% (27/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Ashton Bowers
Player
Sarah Hamner
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ashton Bowers | Sarah Hamner |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (17/16) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (40/36) | 0% (0/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (349/332) | 33% (6/12) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (10/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.44 |
| Aces Total | 49 | 4 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 90 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:13:5 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 411 | 682 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (917/1499) | 67% (45/67) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (548/917) | 47% (21/45) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (259/582) | 59% (13/22) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (83/192) | 20% (2/10) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (687/1542) | 41% (27/66) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (14/13) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (15/31) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (17/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (17/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 19% (16/3) | 0% (1/0) |
Ashton Bowers Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Ashton Bowers
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
50%
(
52 of
103)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
11
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
53 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katrina Scott
Player
Ashton Bowers
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Flores
Player
Ashton Bowers
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Akasha Urhobo
Player
Ashton Bowers
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Adriana Reami
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Sarah Hamner
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
53%
(
57 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
41%
(
21 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
48 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Angella Okutoyi
Player
Ashton Bowers
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
68 of
97)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
85
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lia Karatancheva
Player
Ashton Bowers
59%
(
61 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
49%
(
51 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Sarah Hamner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Sarah Hamner
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eleana Yu
Player
Sarah Hamner
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Riya Bhatia
Player
Sarah Hamner
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
1
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
5-7 6-1 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sarah Hamner
Player
Anna Sinclair Rogers
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Sarah Hamner
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sarah Hamner
Player
Claire Hill
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
40%
(
20 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Chanelle Van Nguyen
Player
Sarah Hamner
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
26 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jantje Tilbuerger
Player
Sarah Hamner
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
Bowers Vs Hamner Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Bowers are available here and Hamner photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
