Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ashlyn Krueger vs Qiang Wang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Wang analysis and find out who is favored!
Ashlyn Krueger vs Qiang Wang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 44.21% of points on his second serve, while Wang has won 42.05%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 55.35% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wang has won 48.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.3% and 44.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 61.25% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wang has saved 57.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 59.02% of matches played (W/L 36/ 25), with Wang winning 62.5% (W/L 5/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Wang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 302/ 186), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 35/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 14/ 9), where as Wang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 5/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Krueger winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Krueger winning 1 and Wang winning 2. The last match between Krueger and Wang was at the Miami Open - Miami, 23-03-2022, First, Hard with Qiang Wang getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Wang have played a deciding set 1 times, with Krueger winning 0 times and Wang 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 0, and Wang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 160.33 while Wang has played against players with an average rank of 159.38.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wang has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 38.82% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wang has converted 45.59% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Krueger 0 - 1 Wang
70
Rank
69
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
827
Rank
12
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
58% (115-84)
Career Total W/L
59% (406-279)
47% (8-9)
YTD W/L
63% (5-3)
$372,445
Career Prize Money
$3,853,637
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ashlyn Krueger | Qiang Wang |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 13 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:21:0 | 2:21:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (85/124) | 62% (50/81) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 53% (45/85) | 76% (38/50) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (20/39) | 42% (13/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 33% (6/18) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (30/81) | 48% (59/124) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Qiang Wang
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
69%
(
85 of
124)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
59 of
124)
110
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ashlyn Krueger | Qiang Wang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (8/9) | 63% (5/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (21/21) | 65% (11/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (202/194) | 53% (80/71) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 63% (5/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.27 |
| Aces Total | 57 | 20 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 67 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:52 | 1:35:1 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 108.24 | 159.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (815/1218) | 62% (313/508) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (545/815) | 64% (201/313) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (181/403) | 42% (82/195) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (61/159) | 46% (31/68) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (562/1298) | 46% (232/505) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (8/17) | 63% (5/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 70% (10/7) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 30% (10/3) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (2/0) |
Ashlyn Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Kasatkina
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
1
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
39 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Gabriela Lee
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
81)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
9
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karolina Pliskova
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
72%
(
83 of
116)
1st Serve %
68%
(
70 of
103)
16
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
2
78%
(
65 of
83)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
13)
30%
(
35 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
103)
116
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Caroline Garcia
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
45%
(
43 of
96)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Yue Yuan
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Ipek Oz
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Kasatkina
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Bernarda Pera
72%
(
78 of
109)
1st Serve %
65%
(
73 of
112)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
8
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
47 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
52 of
112)
114
Total Points Won
107
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Qiang Wang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Qiang Wang
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Jia-Jing Lu
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Wushuang Zheng
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
En Shuo Liang
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
44
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Han Shi
Player
Qiang Wang
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
75 of
120)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
45 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
59 of
120)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Lanlana Tararudee
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
46%
(
39 of
85)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Shutong Qu
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xiyu Wang
Player
Qiang Wang
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Qiang Wang
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Qiang Wang
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Krueger Vs Wang Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Ashlyn Krueger
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Qiang Wang
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
