Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ashlyn Krueger vs Kimmi Hance Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Hance analysis and find out who is favored!
Ashlyn Krueger vs Kimmi Hance Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 44.21% of points on his second serve, while Hance has won 47.37%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 55.35% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hance has won 52.59%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.3% and 38.8% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 61.25% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hance has saved 59.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 58.73% of matches played (W/L 37/ 26), with Hance winning 59.26% (W/L 16/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Hance has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 38/ 31), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 10/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 14/ 9), where as Hance has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 9/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Krueger winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Krueger winning 2 and Hance winning 0. The last match between Krueger and Hance was at the W60 Rome, 27-01-2021, First, Hard with Ashlyn Krueger getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Hance have played a deciding set 0 times, with Krueger winning 0 times and Hance 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 0, and Hance 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 161.43 while Hance has played against players with an average rank of 115.7.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hance has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 38.82% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hance has converted 72.41% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Krueger 1 - 0 Hance
69
Rank
69
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
894
Rank
799
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
58% (115-84)
Career Total W/L
54% (49-42)
47% (8-9)
YTD W/L
50% (1-1)
$372,445
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ashlyn Krueger | Kimmi Hance |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:0 | 1:29:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (41/69) | 61% (37/61) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (27/41) | 57% (21/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (13/28) | 21% (5/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 8% (1/12) |
| Return Points W% | 57% (35/61) | 42% (29/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Kimmi Hance
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ashlyn Krueger | Kimmi Hance |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (8/9) | 50% (1/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (21/21) | 50% (2/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (202/194) | 57% (17/13) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 50% (1/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 57 | 3 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 67 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:52 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 108.24 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (815/1218) | 64% (75/117) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (545/815) | 55% (41/75) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (181/403) | 45% (19/42) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (61/159) | 82% (9/11) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (562/1298) | 53% (51/96) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (8/17) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 70% (10/7) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 30% (10/3) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Ashlyn Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Kasatkina
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
1
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
39 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Gabriela Lee
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
81)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
9
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karolina Pliskova
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
72%
(
83 of
116)
1st Serve %
68%
(
70 of
103)
16
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
2
78%
(
65 of
83)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
13)
30%
(
35 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
103)
116
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Caroline Garcia
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
45%
(
43 of
96)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Yue Yuan
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Ipek Oz
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Kasatkina
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Bernarda Pera
72%
(
78 of
109)
1st Serve %
65%
(
73 of
112)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
8
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
47 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
52 of
112)
114
Total Points Won
107
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kimmi Hance Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Olivia Lincer
Player
Kimmi Hance
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
34 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Olivia Center
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve %
71%
(
17 of
24)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
10 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
36
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Catherine Harrison
Player
Kimmi Hance
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Mia Kupres
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Dalayna Hewitt
Player
Kimmi Hance
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Allura Zamarripa
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
2
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
10
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Haley Giavara
Player
Kimmi Hance
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Sabastiani Leon
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Filippa Bruu-Syversen
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Krueger Vs Hance Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
