MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Ashlyn Krueger vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-To-Head: Krueger 1 - 0 Friedsam

They have played 2 sets in total, with Krueger winning 2 and Friedsam winning 0. The last match between Krueger and Friedsam was at the Berlin Ladies Open - Berlin, 14-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Ashlyn Krueger getting the victory 6-3 6-0.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Ashlyn Krueger 1
Anna-Lena Friedsam 0

LAST H2H MATCH: Berlin Ladies Open - Berlin(14-06-2025)

flag
flag
6 3
6 0
Krueger vs Friedsam H2H Profile
Krueger Stats Friedsam
54% (22-19) YTD Win/Loss 73% (30-11)
1 Head-to-Head 0
31 Ranking 225
31 Highest Rank 45
21 Age 31
- Plays R
3 Titles 15
57% (158-120) Career Total W/L 60% (391-257)
$1,321,233 Career Prize Money $1,078,782
0 YTD Titles 1
1 Grass H2H 0

Today’s Tennis Tips:

Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass

Wimbledon - London atp

11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals

ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE

Taylor Fritz

To Win

46.47 %
24.59%

Anisimova VS Swiatek PREDICTION Grass

Wimbledon - London wta

12 Jul 2025 / Final

ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE

Iga Swiatek

To Win

87.04 %
24.93%

Krueger VS Friedsam H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-3 6-0
cross
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
62% ( 34 of 55)
1st Serve %
65% ( 36 of 55)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
62% ( 21 of 34)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 18 of 36)
71% ( 15 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 6 of 19)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
14% ( 1 of 7)
35% ( 19 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 31 of 55)
67
Total Points Won
43

Krueger VS Friedsam H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Krueger Vs Friedsam H2H Stats
Ashlyn Krueger Krueger Stats Anna-Lena Friedsam Friedsam
1 H2H Matches 0
2 Sets Won 0
12 Games Won 3
2 Aces (Total) 1
3 Total Double Faults 2
1:8:1 Average Match Time 1:8:1
62% (34/55) 1st Serve % 65% (36/55)
62% (21/34) 1st Serve Win % 50% (18/36)
71% (15/21) 2nd Serve Win % 32% (6/19)
50% (5/10) Break Points Won % (Total) 14% (1/7)
56% (31/55) Return Points Win % 35% (19/55)
100% (1/1) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0)
0% (1/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Krueger vs Friedsam Match Preview :

  • Krueger slightly edges Friedsam in second serve performance, securing 41.43% of points versus 40.57% by Friedsam.
  • On second serve returns, Krueger and Friedsam show almost identical prowess, with scores of 49.57% and 49.49% respectively.
  • How about first serve returns? Krueger has a minor advantage, achieving 31.76% over Friedsam's 30.87%.
  • When facing breakpoints, Friedsam outperforms by saving 55.29%, compared to Krueger's 45.51%.
  • In the past year, Friedsam has a superior match win rate of 72.34% versus Krueger's 57.63%.
  • Grass appears to be Krueger's preferred surface, boasting a win rate of 67%, while Friedsam excels on indoor hard courts, with a 67% success rate.
  • Considering the tour level, Krueger has been competing mostly on the Main tour, with a 59.26% win rate, whereas Friedsam has focused on Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 74.36%.
  • Krueger has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 73.15, compared to Friedsam's 280.36-ranked opponents.
  • In deciding sets, Friedsam has a slightly higher win rate, claiming victory in 68% of such scenarios, while Krueger stands at 60%.
  • Under pressure, Krueger boasts a better breakpoint conversion rate, seizing 40.97% of opportunities compared to 34.51% by Friedsam.

Editorial Prediction (June 13, 2025, UTC):

In this upcoming tennis matchup, both players showcase strengths in different areas. Krueger demonstrates a slight edge in second serve success and first serve returns, and holds a better breakpoint conversion rate which can be crucial during pivotal match moments. Krueger has also been competing against higher-ranked opponents, suggesting experience against tougher competition.

On the other hand, Friedsam showcases resilience, particularly in saving breakpoints, and maintains a higher overall win rate over the last year, albeit at a different tour level. Friedsam's performance in deciding sets also indicates strong mental fortitude when matches are on the line.

Assessing these factors, while Friedsam's higher win percentage is notable, the context of competition level and slight performance edge in critical match statistics suggest Krueger might capitalize effectively under the current conditions.

Based on recent performances and the competitiveness of matches faced, Krueger is slightly favored to win this match.

Krueger vs Friedsam Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88

Ashlyn Krueger Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R2
cross
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
59% ( 41 of 70)
1st Serve %
53% ( 44 of 83)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
73% ( 30 of 41)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 28 of 44)
52% ( 15 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 17 of 39)
30% ( 3 of 10)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
36% ( 25 of 70)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 38 of 83)
83
Total Points Won
70
L
7-6(4) 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Mika Stojsavljevic
67% ( 39 of 58)
1st Serve %
57% ( 33 of 58)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
56% ( 22 of 39)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 19 of 33)
79% ( 15 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 11 of 25)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
36% ( 21 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 28 of 58)
65
Total Points Won
51
W
6-3 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
76% ( 38 of 50)
1st Serve %
70% ( 40 of 57)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
79% ( 30 of 38)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 24 of 40)
50% ( 6 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
29% ( 5 of 17)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
28% ( 14 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 28 of 57)
64
Total Points Won
43
L
6-1 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
66% ( 35 of 53)
1st Serve %
65% ( 43 of 66)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
89% ( 31 of 35)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 30 of 43)
44% ( 8 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
26% ( 6 of 23)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
26% ( 14 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 30 of 66)
69
Total Points Won
50
L
7-5 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Maria Timofeeva
51% ( 43 of 84)
1st Serve %
60% ( 55 of 92)
2
Aces
1
16
Double Faults
7
70% ( 30 of 43)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 35 of 55)
39% ( 16 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 14 of 37)
78% ( 7 of 9)
Break Points Won
67% ( 6 of 9)
45% ( 38 of 84)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 43 of 92)
89
Total Points Won
87
W
3-6 7-5 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Elena Rybakina
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
66% ( 49 of 74)
1st Serve %
65% ( 50 of 77)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
71% ( 35 of 49)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 35 of 50)
52% ( 13 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 9 of 27)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
35% ( 26 of 74)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 33 of 77)
81
Total Points Won
70
L
6-3 7-6(3) H2H
QF
cross
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
62% ( 31 of 50)
1st Serve %
64% ( 42 of 66)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
68% ( 21 of 31)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 23 of 42)
68% ( 13 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 9 of 24)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
32% ( 16 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 34 of 66)
68
Total Points Won
48
L
6-4 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
62% ( 34 of 55)
1st Serve %
65% ( 36 of 55)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
62% ( 21 of 34)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 18 of 36)
71% ( 15 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 6 of 19)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
14% ( 1 of 7)
35% ( 19 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 31 of 55)
67
Total Points Won
43
W
6-3 6-0 H2H

Anna-Lena Friedsam Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
QF
cross
Eva Vedder
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
56% ( 27 of 48)
1st Serve %
63% ( 37 of 59)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
78% ( 21 of 27)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 23 of 37)
71% ( 15 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 7 of 22)
29% ( 4 of 14)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
25% ( 12 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 29 of 59)
65
Total Points Won
42
L
6-1 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Yuliya Hatouka
59% ( 39 of 66)
1st Serve %
69% ( 50 of 72)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
72% ( 28 of 39)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 33 of 50)
48% ( 13 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 9 of 22)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
38% ( 25 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 30 of 72)
71
Total Points Won
67
W
7-6(5) 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Noelia Bouzo Zanotti
60% ( 26 of 43)
1st Serve %
54% ( 32 of 59)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
85% ( 22 of 26)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 20 of 32)
65% ( 11 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 12 of 27)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
23% ( 10 of 43)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 27 of 59)
60
Total Points Won
42
W
6-3 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
62% ( 34 of 55)
1st Serve %
65% ( 36 of 55)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
62% ( 21 of 34)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 18 of 36)
71% ( 15 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 6 of 19)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
14% ( 1 of 7)
35% ( 19 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 31 of 55)
67
Total Points Won
43
L
6-3 6-0 H2H
F
cross
Alexis Blokhina
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
64% ( 53 of 83)
1st Serve %
76% ( 78 of 103)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
57% ( 30 of 53)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 46 of 78)
60% ( 18 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 8 of 25)
31% ( 5 of 16)
Break Points Won
36% ( 4 of 11)
42% ( 35 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 49 of 103)
97
Total Points Won
89
L
6-3 2-6 6-3 H2H
SF
cross
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
72% ( 64 of 89)
1st Serve %
57% ( 50 of 88)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
69% ( 44 of 64)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 26 of 50)
36% ( 9 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 19 of 38)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
20% ( 2 of 10)
40% ( 36 of 89)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 43 of 88)
96
Total Points Won
81
W
6-7(4) 6-1 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
60% ( 59 of 99)
1st Serve %
62% ( 66 of 107)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
69% ( 41 of 59)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 42 of 66)
43% ( 17 of 40)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 17 of 41)
25% ( 5 of 20)
Break Points Won
29% ( 4 of 14)
41% ( 41 of 99)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 48 of 107)
106
Total Points Won
100
W
7-5 4-6 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Sofia Shapatava
72% ( 26 of 36)
1st Serve %
67% ( 35 of 52)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
81% ( 21 of 26)
1st Serve Won
23% ( 8 of 35)
60% ( 6 of 10)
2nd Serve Won
65% ( 11 of 17)
50% ( 6 of 12)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
25% ( 9 of 36)
Rtn Points Won
63% ( 33 of 52)
60
Total Points Won
28
W
6-2 6-0 H2H
banner

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Krueger & Friedsam Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Ashlyn Krueger Krueger Stats Anna-Lena Friedsam Friedsam
57% (158/120) Win/Loss 60% (391/257)
55% (352/288) Sets Win/Loss 58% (878/628)
52% (3095/2881) Games Win/Loss 54% (7495/6483)
58% (106/77) Hard Win/Loss 56% (103/80)
55% (34/28) Clay Win/Loss 60% (137/92)
43% (3/4) Indoor Hard W/L 67% (135/66)
58% (15/11) Grass Win/Loss 46% (16/19)
0.24 Aces Per Game 0.22
709 Aces Total 1525
0.39 Double Faults Per Game 0.24
1128 Total Double Faults 1629
1st Match Average Match Time 1:10:42
288.02 Average Opponent Rank 449.39
64% (11725/18285) 1st Serve % 65% (21697/33383)
63% (7432/11725) 1st Serve Win % 65% (14168/21697)
44% (2897/6560) 2nd Serve Win % 46% (5388/11684)
45% (1023/2250) Break Points Won % (Total) 45% (1651/3641)
45% (8256/18474) Return Points Win % 43% (14079/33001)
46% (11/13) Slam W/L 38% (21/35)
54% (27/23) Masters W/L 33% (10/20)
0% (0/0) Cups W/L 40% (2/3)
56% (39/31) Main Tour W/L 53% (101/90)
60% (70/46) Challenger W/L 69% (204/93)
61% (11/7) Futures W/L 77% (53/16)
56% (154/274) Best of 3 Sets Win % 60% (382/634)
100% (1/1) Best of 5 Sets Win % 100% (1/1)
55% (35/64) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 51% (87/169)
54% (47/87) Deciding Set Win % 54% (119/220)
85% (157/133) 1st Set Won, Won Match 86% (387/331)
15% (157/23) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 14% (387/55)
19% (121/23) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 23% (261/59)

Krueger vs. Friedsam Prediction Form Trend:

Other Predictions

W35 Hillcrest

flag
flag
Prediction

W75 The Hague

flag
flag
Prediction
  • Loading news...