Ashlyn Krueger vs Anna Bondar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 May at 03:36 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Krueger vs A. Bondar

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

HUN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Krueger 1 - 0 Bondar
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ashlyn Krueger winning 2 and Anna Bondar winning 1. The last match between Ashlyn Krueger and Anna Bondar was at the Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome, 07-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Ashlyn Krueger getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Krueger | 1 |
| Bondar | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome(05-07-25)
A. Krueger vs A. Bondar H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,512,233 | Career Prize Money | $973,336 |
| 55.71% (161-128) | Career Total W/L | 62.98% (444-261) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 19 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 48.84% (21-22) | YTD Win/Loss | 39.29% (11-17) |
A. Krueger vs A. Bondar Match Preview:
- Does Bondar hold a slight edge in second serve points lately? Yes, winning 42.91% compared to Krueger's 41.46% in recent performance.
- How do they stand in return games? Krueger slightly outpaces Bondar in second serve returns at 48.83% against 48.77%, but Bondar excels in first serve returns with 33.83% over Krueger's 32.04%.
- When facing breakpoints, Bondar demonstrates resilience, saving 48.29% of them, a bit better than Krueger's 45.42%.
- Are their match win percentages similar? Bondar has a minor advantage, capturing 59.21% of matches versus Krueger's 57.89% over the last year.
- On which surface does each player excel? Krueger thrives on Grass (67% win rate), whereas Bondar dominates on Clay with a 69% success rate.
- Has the level of competition faced impacted their performance? Yes, Krueger has competed more on the Main tour, taking on higher-ranked opponents (average rank: 86.7) than Bondar, who has excelled in Challenger/ITF tournaments against players with an average rank of 182.25.
- In deciding set scenarios, Bondar edges Krueger, winning 57% of such sets compared to Krueger's 54%.
- Could breakpoint conversion be a pivotal difference? Krueger converts 40.22% of his opportunities, overshadowing Bondar's 33.77% success rate in this crucial statistic.
Editorial Prediction (May 7, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing their statistical performances, both players show particular strengths that could influence the match outcome. Bondar's consistency in second serve points and first serve returns suggests a solid baseline performance.
While Krueger's competitive edge in breakpoint conversion offers a strategic advantage, Bondar's experience in saving breakpoints and deciding sets might prove crucial under pressure.
Considering Bondar's better overall win percentage in recent matches and his ability to perform well across various conditions, Bondar appears slightly more favored to emerge victorious in this head-to-head clash.
Ashlyn Krueger vs Anna Bondar Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Krueger vs A. Bondar H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 9 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:53:16 | Average Match Time | 1:53:16 |
| 78% (58/74) | 1st Serve % | 66% (56/85) |
| 78% (45/58) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (30/56) |
| 56% (9/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 62% (18/29) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 44% (37/85) | Return Points Win % | 27% (20/74) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Krueger Recent Matches Played
A. Bondar Recent Matches Played

A. Krueger vs A. Bondar Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.71% (161/128) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.98% (444/261) |
| 54.04% (361/307) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.14% (988/628) |
| 51.47% (3214/3031) | Games Win/Loss | 54.13% (8167/6920) |
| 56.19% (109/85) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.36% (93/75) |
| 54.84% (34/28) | Clay Win/Loss | 69.08% (324/145) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44.07% (26/33) |
| 57.69% (15/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 11.11% (1/8) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
| 772 | Aces Total | 2210 |
| 0.39 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1193 | Total Double Faults | 1228 |
| 1:33:25 | Average Match Time | 1:29:50 |
| 296.26 | Average Opponent Rank | 443.42 |
| 64% (12255/19117) | 1st Serve % | 59% (24595/41730) |
| 63% (7759/12255) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (16223/24595) |
| 44% (3037/6862) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (8223/17135) |
| 45% (1056/2332) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (2367/5064) |
| 44% (8569/19265) | Return Points Win % | 44% (18854/42493) |
| 46.15% (12/14) | Slam W/L | 27.59% (8/21) |
| 50.91% (28/27) | Masters W/L | 45.00% (18/22) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 47.37% (9/10) |
| 54.05% (40/34) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (57/57) |
| 60.34% (70/46) | Challenger W/L | 66.28% (230/117) |
| 61.11% (11/7) | Futures W/L | 78.21% (122/34) |
| 55% (157/285) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (436/696) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 54% (36/67) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (97/184) |
| 54% (50/93) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (105/211) |
| 84% (160/134) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (453/394) |
| 16% (160/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (453/59) |
| 19% (129/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (252/50) |