S. Lamens
To Win
A. Krueger
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L L W L W LForm
W L L W W W W L W LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Krueger winning 1 and Potapova winning 2. The last match between Krueger and Potapova was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 23-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Anastasia Potapova getting the victory 6-7(7) 6-4 6-2.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Ashlyn Krueger | 0 |
Anastasia Potapova | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(23-04-2025)
Krueger | Stats | Potapova |
---|---|---|
58% (18-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 68% (17-8) |
0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
37 | Ranking | 36 |
34 | Highest Rank | 21 |
21 | Age | 24 |
- | Plays | R |
3 | Titles | 4 |
57% (154-114) | Career Total W/L | 59% (233-163) |
$1,090,978 | Career Prize Money | $3,038,891 |
0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
25 May 2025 / First
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
56%
(
58 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
64 of
90)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
5
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
106
Total Points Won
88
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
1 | Sets Won | 2 |
13 | Games Won | 18 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
5 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
2:10:45 | Average Match Time | 2:10:45 |
71% (64/90) | 1st Serve % | 56% (58/104) |
58% (37/64) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (38/58) |
35% (9/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (24/46) |
50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 58% (7/12) |
40% (42/104) | Return Points Win % | 49% (44/90) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Over the past six months, Potapova has demonstrated slightly stronger second serve performance, winning 43.17% of points behind her second serve compared to Krueger's 41.71%. This serves as an important indicator when predicting match outcomes. Both players have showcased similar efficiency in converting breakpoints, with Potapova at 39.34% and Krueger closely trailing at 39.77%, a critical statistic for in-game scenarios.
In terms of return statistics, Potapova has outperformed Krueger by winning 49.24% of points on her opponent's second serve, while Krueger has managed 48.89%. Comparatively, when it comes to first serve returns, Krueger has the upper hand, capturing 31.93% of points versus Potapova's 28.77%. These numbers significantly impact the overall matchup prediction.
Under pressure, Potapova has shown better resilience by saving 56.8% of breakpoints compared to Krueger's 45.61%. This aspect is crucial for making accurate live betting predictions. Over the past year, Potapova has claimed victory in 57.45% of her matches, slightly lower than Krueger's 58.73%. The win/loss records show Potapova at 27/20 and Krueger at 37/26, adding depth to the comparison.
When considering their preferred surfaces, Potapova excels on indoor hard courts, boasting a win rate of 67%, while struggling a bit on traditional hard courts at 53%. Conversely, Krueger's forte is grass surfaces with a similar 67% win rate, but she has difficulty on indoor hard surfaces, posting only a 43% success rate. In terms of playing level, Potapova has predominantly competed on the Main tour, winning 69.57% of her matches, slightly outshining Krueger's 60.71% success rate in the same circuit.
Regarding opponent quality, Potapova has been facing higher-ranked competitors, with an average opponent rank of 70.62. Krueger's opponents, on average, had a rank of 93.81, potentially easing her competitive burn. Deciding set statistics suggest that Krueger holds an edge, securing 56% of these critical sets over the past year, compared to Potapova's 47%.
Analyzing these metrics collectively, Potapova displays a more consistent performance and resilience, especially against higher-quality opponents. These factors may tilt the predictions in her favor. However, Krueger's ability to capitalize on first serve returns and strong performance in deciding sets remains notable. Statistically, Potapova is slightly favored to win, owing to her superior performance stats and experience against tougher opponents. Nonetheless, Krueger's strengths could lead to an unpredictable and highly competitive match.
Krueger vs Potapova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Mccartney Kessler
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
35 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jessica Pegula
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
48%
(
30 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Anna Bondar
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
56 of
85)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
56%
(
58 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
64 of
90)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
5
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
106
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Emma Navarro
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
51%
(
42 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
93
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Katie Volynets
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
0
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R4 |
![]() ![]()
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Anastasia Potapova
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Dayana Yastremska
52%
(
55 of
106)
1st Serve %
60%
(
68 of
113)
3
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
7
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
51%
(
26 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
46%
(
49 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
53 of
113)
110
Total Points Won
109
|
2-6 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R4 |
![]() ![]()
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Anastasia Potapova
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Sofia Kenin
47%
(
47 of
100)
1st Serve %
69%
(
78 of
113)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
49 of
78)
55%
(
29 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
49 of
113)
106
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Qinwen Zheng
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
62)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
56%
(
58 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
64 of
90)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
5
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
106
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Clara Tauson
51%
(
47 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
77 of
116)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
47 of
77)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
52 of
116)
107
Total Points Won
102
|
2-6 7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
57% (154/114) | Win/Loss | 59% (233/163) |
56% (344/275) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (529/413) |
52% (2999/2777) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4581/4228) |
58% (106/77) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (103/90) |
55% (33/27) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (75/41) |
43% (3/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66% (41/21) |
67% (12/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 56% (14/11) |
0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
695 | Aces Total | 800 |
0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.42 |
1073 | Total Double Faults | 1799 |
1:33:22 | Average Match Time | 1:36:9 |
289.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 285.32 |
64% (11319/17617) | 1st Serve % | 56% (15768/28098) |
63% (7177/11319) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (10018/15768) |
44% (2787/6298) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (5565/12330) |
45% (989/2190) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1667/3637) |
45% (8004/17867) | Return Points Win % | 46% (13021/28277) |
45% (9/11) | Slam W/L | 50% (23/23) |
54% (27/23) | Masters W/L | 49% (40/42) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
58% (37/27) | Main Tour W/L | 63% (117/69) |
60% (70/46) | Challenger W/L | 63% (40/23) |
61% (11/7) | Futures W/L | 71% (12/5) |
57% (150/264) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (227/385) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
56% (35/62) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (56/108) |
53% (46/86) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (89/155) |
84% (154/130) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (214/179) |
15% (154/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (214/35) |
19% (114/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 30% (182/54) |