A. F. R. Fierros
To Win
J. Pereira
To Win
Aryan Shah vs Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L W W W W L
Form
W L W W L W L W W WHead-2-Head: Shah 1 - 0 Fierros
They have played 2 sets in total, with Shah winning 2 and Fierros winning 0. The last match between Shah and Fierros was at the M25 Santo Domingo, 06-06-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Hard, with Aryan Shah getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Aryan Shah | 1 |
| Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Santo Domingo(06-06-2025)
Aryan Shah
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
6
2
6
3
| Shah | Stats | Fierros |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (28-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (13-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 489 | Ranking | 842 |
| 445 | Highest Rank | 687 |
| 19 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 64% (78-43) | Career Total W/L | 53% (114-100) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
19 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kudermetova VS Smith PREDICTION Hard
Mubadala Citi DC Open - Washington wta
19 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dodig VS Passaro PREDICTION Clay
Plava Laguna Croatia Open - Umag atp
20 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Aryan Shah
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
47%
(
28 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:40:16 | Average Match Time | 1:40:16 |
| 47% (28/60) | 1st Serve % | 62% (31/50) |
| 79% (22/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (17/31) |
| 50% (16/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (8/19) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 50% (25/50) | Return Points Win % | 37% (22/60) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shah vs Fierros Match Preview :
- In terms of second serve points, Shah wins 41.22%, closely followed by Fierros at 41.35%. Is there a real advantage here? Not significantly, as both are nearly identical.
- Shah trails Fierros in return game stats, winning 45.23% of opponents' second serve points compared to Fierros's 52.33%.
- When returning first serves, Shah wins 25.38% of points, while Fierros is more effective at 31.12%.
- Under pressure, Shah saves 47.17% of breakpoints, but Fierros shows greater composure with a 54.45% save rate.
- Shah boasts a stronger performance overview, with a 65.57% match win rate over the past year, outperforming Fierros's 48.98%.
- Both players excel on indoor hard courts, each achieving a 67% win rate, but Shah edges out on clay with 58% compared to Fierros's 44%.
- Shah has competed against tougher opponents, facing an average rank of 128.77, whereas Fierros's opponents average at 352.94.
- In deciding set matches, Fierros wins 69% of the time, offering a slight edge over Shah's 61% win rate.
- Break point conversion rates are close, with Shah converting 35.86% and Fierros at 34.11%, suggesting similar opportunistic capabilities.
Editorial Prediction (June 6, 2025, UTC):
Both Shah and Fierros present competitive stats, with minor variances across several key areas. Shah's superior overall win-loss record and the ability to challenge higher-ranked opponents provide them a slight advantage in experience and adaptability.
Fierros, however, demonstrates consistent composure under pressure and impressive return games, particularly against Shah's second serve. This dynamic warrants attention, as it could be the deciding factor in match scenarios.
Ultimately, while the margin is narrow, Shah's proven performance record and ability to compete fiercely against higher-caliber players suggest that Shah is the likelier victor in this upcoming tennis match.
Shah vs Fierros Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Aryan Shah Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Fajing Sun
Player
Aryan Shah
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aryan Shah
Player
Ryan Peniston
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aryan Shah
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
32%
(
12 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
49 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aryan Shah
Player
Daniil Glinka
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aryan Shah
Player
John Echeverria
41%
(
21 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Aryan Shah
62%
(
68 of
110)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
8
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
0
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
39 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Aryan Shah
52%
(
51 of
99)
1st Serve %
48%
(
34 of
71)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
27 of
34)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 6-7(5) 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Aryan Shah
100%
(
1 of
1)
1st Serve %
0%
(
0 of
0)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
0%
(
0 of
1)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Rtn Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0
Total Points Won
1
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Victor Lilov
61%
(
67 of
109)
1st Serve %
48%
(
48 of
101)
3
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
7
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Lucca Pinto
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
42%
(
34 of
81)
5
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
11
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Tobias Sonne
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
76%
(
53 of
70)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Ronald Hohmann
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aryan Shah
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
47%
(
28 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Andrew Delgado
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Tristan Mccormick
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
50
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (78/43) | Win/Loss | 53% (114/100) |
| 62% (165/103) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (254/232) |
| 55% (1331/1081) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (2362/2241) |
| 66% (69/35) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (90/73) |
| 50% (7/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (20/25) |
| 67% (2/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 264 | Aces Total | 376 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 315 | Total Double Faults | 498 |
| 1:29:6 | Average Match Time | 1:29:19 |
| 408.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 364.54 |
| 57% (3903/6822) | 1st Serve % | 65% (7362/11412) |
| 69% (2674/3903) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (4786/7362) |
| 50% (1466/2919) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1925/4050) |
| 46% (377/814) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (477/1121) |
| 43% (3051/7036) | Return Points Win % | 40% (4510/11208) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 57% (8/6) | Challenger W/L | 25% (5/15) |
| 65% (70/37) | Futures W/L | 58% (108/78) |
| 66% (76/116) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (111/211) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 47% (9/19) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (35/62) |
| 67% (20/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (31/60) |
| 91% (75/68) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (115/99) |
| 9% (75/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (115/15) |
| 22% (46/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (99/13) |
Shah vs. Fierros Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
