A. Rinderknech
To Win
B. Shelton
To Win
Arthur Rinderknech vs Miomir Kecmanovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L L W L W L
Form
L W W W L L L W L LH2H: Rinderknech 2 - 1 Kecmanovic
They have played 10 sets in total, with Rinderknech winning 6 and Kecmanovic winning 4. The last match between Rinderknech and Kecmanovic was at the Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva, 20-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Arthur Rinderknech getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Arthur Rinderknech | 2 |
| Miomir Kecmanovic | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva(20-05-2025)
Arthur Rinderknech
Miomir Kecmanovic
6
4
6
2
| Rinderknech | Stats | Kecmanovic |
|---|---|---|
| 31% (9-20) | YTD Win/Loss | 51% (18-17) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 80 | Ranking | 47 |
| 42 | Highest Rank | 27 |
| 29 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 11 | Titles | 7 |
| 59% (313-218) | Career Total W/L | 56% (313-241) |
| $1,870,140 | Career Prize Money | $4,974,895 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
17 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Humbert VS Shapovalov PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Alcaraz VS Fokina PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
15 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rinderknech VS Kecmanovic H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| 6-7(10) 3-6 7-5 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
65%
(
113 of
175)
1st Serve %
58%
(
95 of
165)
25
Aces
21
6
Double Faults
4
76%
(
86 of
113)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
73 of
95)
50%
(
31 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
58 of
175)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
52 of
165)
169
Total Points Won
171
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
1
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
Rinderknech VS Kecmanovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 52 | Games Won | 46 |
| 39 | Aces (Total) | 23 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:25:3 | Average Match Time | 2:25:3 |
| 65% (192/297) | 1st Serve % | 61% (180/296) |
| 73% (140/192) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (127/180) |
| 50% (53/105) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (68/116) |
| 32% (11/34) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (7/15) |
| 34% (101/296) | Return Points Win % | 35% (104/297) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rinderknech vs Kecmanovic Match Preview :
- How has second serve performance been for both players recently? Rinderknech won 45.99% of his second serve points, while Kecmanovic secured 47.88% in the last 6 months, potentially giving Kecmanovic a slight edge.
- In terms of return games, Kecmanovic again seems to have an advantage, capturing 48.32% of opponent's second serve points compared to Rinderknech's 44.24%.
- For first serve returns, Kecmanovic has a slight lead, with 24.29% versus Rinderknech's 22.71%, correlating closely with scoring predictions.
- Which player handles pressure better? Rinderknech saved 58.86% of breakpoints, outperforming Kecmanovic, who saved 55.79%.
- Comparing overall matches over the last year, Rinderknech won 45.16% of his matches while Kecmanovic won 50%, indicating a better overall performance for Kecmanovic.
- Rinderknech's best performance surface is indoor hard courts (61% win rate), whereas Kecmanovic excels on clay (61% win rate). Both struggle on grass, showing similar weaknesses.
- What about experience on the Main tour? Rinderknech has a win rate of 44.12%, while Kecmanovic holds a slightly better rate at 51.72%.
- Their direct head-to-head matches stand at 1-1, with an equal share of sets, indicating a competitive balance.
- In deciding sets over the last year, Rinderknech has a 46% win rate, slightly higher than Kecmanovic's 40%, possibly hinting at an edge if the match extends.
- Rinderknech struggles with break point conversion at 22.22%, whereas Kecmanovic converts 30.19% of opportunities, suggesting keener strategic play on crucial points.
Editorial Prediction (May 19, 2025, UTC):
The head-to-head history between Arthur Rinderknech and Miomir Kecmanovic reveals a closely matched rivalry, with each player claiming one victory out of their two encounters. However, Kecmanovic displays a consistent advantage in aspects like second serve performance and break point conversion, both critical factors in tight matches.
Rinderknech's resilience in saving break points and slightly better win rate in deciding sets might offer him critical leverage. Nevertheless, when considering their match records over the past year and their return game effectiveness, Kecmanovic has shown more consistent results.
Given the details of their game dynamics and these comparative statistics, Kecmanovic seems poised to edge out Rinderknech, assuming other variables remain constant and no significant changes in form occur during the current event.
Therefore, based on recent performance patterns and metrics, Miomir Kecmanovic is anticipated to be the likely winner of their upcoming match.
Rinderknech vs Kecmanovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Arthur Rinderknech Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
74 of
109)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
55 of
74)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
109)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Johannus Monday
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
9
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
3
91%
(
39 of
43)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
38 of
47)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
14 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
20 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(2) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
11
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Denis Shapovalov
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
9
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
4
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
27%
(
24 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
101
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
10
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
59%
(
63 of
106)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
5
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
2
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Miomir Kecmanovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
64%
(
70 of
109)
1st Serve %
68%
(
82 of
121)
8
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
56 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
58 of
82)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
29%
(
32 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
121)
120
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
51%
(
76 of
150)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
126)
22
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
1
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
54 of
75)
62%
(
46 of
74)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
32%
(
48 of
150)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
41 of
126)
143
Total Points Won
133
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Sebastian Baez
55%
(
88 of
160)
1st Serve %
71%
(
130 of
184)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
78 of
130)
53%
(
38 of
72)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
37%
(
10 of
27)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
38%
(
61 of
160)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
83 of
184)
182
Total Points Won
162
|
6-7(3) 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
16
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
86
Total Points Won
58
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Nuno Borges
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
72 of
117)
4
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
54 of
117)
111
Total Points Won
96
|
6-0 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Denis Yevseyev
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
77%
(
72 of
93)
1
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
46 of
72)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (313/218) | Win/Loss | 56% (313/241) |
| 57% (731/562) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (748/614) |
| 53% (6646/6012) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6818/6270) |
| 59% (100/69) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (138/103) |
| 59% (99/69) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (124/82) |
| 61% (97/62) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49% (35/36) |
| 49% (17/18) | Grass Win/Loss | 44% (16/20) |
| 0.63 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 3911 | Aces Total | 1996 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1190 | Total Double Faults | 1090 |
| 1:40:28 | Average Match Time | 1:40:36 |
| 353.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 326.95 |
| 64% (22959/35793) | 1st Serve % | 60% (23926/39553) |
| 75% (17224/22959) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (16767/23926) |
| 50% (6457/12833) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (8311/15622) |
| 38% (1170/3107) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1533/3754) |
| 36% (13327/36802) | Return Points Win % | 38% (15452/40293) |
| 44% (14/18) | Slam W/L | 51% (30/29) |
| 38% (15/24) | Masters W/L | 41% (35/51) |
| 33% (2/4) | Cups W/L | 55% (6/5) |
| 53% (79/71) | Main Tour W/L | 55% (114/94) |
| 63% (93/54) | Challenger W/L | 62% (58/35) |
| 70% (110/47) | Futures W/L | 73% (69/26) |
| 61% (301/496) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (280/493) |
| 35% (9/26) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (27/54) |
| 49% (115/237) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (110/238) |
| 56% (110/198) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (88/174) |
| 85% (296/251) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (331/270) |
| 15% (296/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (331/61) |
| 26% (234/60) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (223/43) |
Rinderknech vs. Kecmanovic Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
