A. Rinderknech
To Win
B. Shelton
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L L W L W LForm
W W L L W L W W W LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Rinderknech winning 2 and Lajal winning 1. The last match between Rinderknech and Lajal was at the Aix En Provence Challenger, 30-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Arthur Rinderknech getting the victory 6-4 6-7(3) 6-3.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Arthur Rinderknech | 1 |
Mark Lajal | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Aix En Provence Challenger(30-04-2025)
Rinderknech | Stats | Lajal |
---|---|---|
31% (9-20) | YTD Win/Loss | 66% (21-11) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
80 | Ranking | 168 |
42 | Highest Rank | 168 |
29 | Age | 22 |
R | Plays | - |
11 | Titles | 4 |
59% (313-218) | Career Total W/L | 61% (156-101) |
$1,870,140 | Career Prize Money | $75,525 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
17 Jun 2025 / First
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Mark Lajal
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
67 of
109)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
10
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
50 of
67)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
26 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
38 of
109)
110
Total Points Won
97
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
18 | Games Won | 14 |
9 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
2:49:20 | Average Match Time | 2:49:20 |
60% (59/98) | 1st Serve % | 61% (67/109) |
81% (48/59) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (50/67) |
62% (24/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (21/42) |
15% (2/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
35% (38/109) | Return Points Win % | 27% (26/98) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Welcome to the epic tennis showdown where the racquets are ready to rumble and the stats are begging for a swing! Let's dive into this statistical cocktail and see who's got the upper hand.
When it comes to the second serve artistry, Rinderknech has managed to win 46.6% of the points, slightly overshadowed by Lajal who’s served up 48.07% of these golden moments over the past 6 months. But wait, let's dig deeper into the murky waters of return games! While Rinderknech's backhand has reclaimed 44.06% of opponent's second serve points, Lajal one-ups him with a 45.16% recovery rate. It's like watching servers and receivers exchanging gifts at a birthday party.
And what's this? First-serve returns are where the party really gets wild, with Rinderknech dancing at 21.94%, whereas Lajal grooves in at a brisk 26.6%. It's a stat that makes you wonder if Rinderknech needs some new dance moves on the court. Now, to add a splash of pressure cooker fun, our friend Rinderknech has hit a 56.03% quota of saved breakpoints, while Lajal squeaks in with a close shave of 53.73%. It's a true nail-biter!
What about their overall varieties of wins, you ask? Rinderknech has managed to cart away 45.16% of the matches he played over the past year (28 wins, 34 losses), while Lajal, ever the collector, captured 61.76% of them (42 wins, 26 losses). You can almost hear him say, "I'll take that, thank you very much!"
And now for the terrain tales! Rinderknech spreads his magic on indoor hard surfaces with a win percentage of 61%, akin to a stage performer on their best night! Meanwhile, Lajal dances across hard surfaces with an even more impressive 64% claim of victories. On the flip side, Grass and Clay struggle to shake their heads in pity as the lesser-loved surfaces for these two gladiators.
The tours tell another tale! Within the past year, while Rinderknech duels it out in the Major leagues with a 44.12% win rate, Lajal seems to thrive among Challengers/ITF events, snatching a hearty 61.11% victory rate. Someone's been doing their homework, clearly!
Confronting the average opponent rank shades Rinderknech's tennis odyssey as he jousted against an average rank of 75.81. Meanwhile, Lajal's adversaries pranced in with a ranking average of 279.68, making you think he's been skating through an easier course. Though the real thrill lies in deciding sets: if your palms are sweating during a tied showdown, bear in mind Rinderknech thrives at 44% win rate; Lajal, not to be outdone, claims a precarious 50%!
Finally, beefing up the drama, the break point conversion rates give Lajal a fabulous 42.99% bite at breaking opponent serves. Rinderknech, on the flipside, could need a bit of polish with just 24.71%.
And so, dear enthusiasts of the glorious game, the stats predict that Lajal will most likely waltz away with this match, leaving Rinderknech pondering his strategic adjustments!
Rinderknech vs Lajal Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Corentin Moutet
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
74 of
109)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
55 of
74)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
109)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Johannus Monday
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
9
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
3
91%
(
39 of
43)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
38 of
47)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
14 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
20 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(2) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
11
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Denis Shapovalov
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
9
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jannik Sinner
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
4
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
27%
(
24 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
101
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
10
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Gigante
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
59%
(
63 of
106)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
5
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
2
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mark Lajal
52%
(
47 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mark Lajal
Player
Laslo Djere
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Mark Lajal
Player
Reilly Opelka
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
15 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Mark Lajal
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Mark Lajal
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
9
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Mark Lajal
Player
Henry Searle
60%
(
61 of
101)
1st Serve %
52%
(
60 of
115)
6
Aces
13
6
Double Faults
4
84%
(
51 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
28%
(
28 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
42 of
115)
115
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Ethan Quinn
Player
Mark Lajal
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59% (313/218) | Win/Loss | 61% (156/101) |
57% (731/562) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (364/243) |
53% (6646/6012) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3129/2689) |
59% (100/69) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (89/49) |
59% (99/69) | Clay Win/Loss | 43% (13/17) |
61% (97/62) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (45/30) |
49% (17/18) | Grass Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) |
0.63 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
3911 | Aces Total | 1243 |
0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
1190 | Total Double Faults | 789 |
1:40:28 | Average Match Time | 1:43:27 |
353.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 360.84 |
64% (22959/35793) | 1st Serve % | 64% (11528/17980) |
75% (17224/22959) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (8206/11528) |
50% (6457/12833) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3250/6458) |
38% (1170/3107) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (758/1824) |
36% (13327/36802) | Return Points Win % | 40% (7311/18237) |
44% (14/18) | Slam W/L | 45% (5/6) |
38% (15/24) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
33% (2/4) | Cups W/L | 40% (2/3) |
53% (79/71) | Main Tour W/L | 63% (5/3) |
63% (93/54) | Challenger W/L | 59% (88/60) |
70% (110/47) | Futures W/L | 66% (56/29) |
61% (301/496) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (153/252) |
35% (9/26) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
49% (115/237) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (50/89) |
56% (110/198) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (41/92) |
85% (296/251) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (154/131) |
15% (296/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (154/23) |
26% (234/60) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (103/26) |