M. Hopp
To Win
A. Nagel
To Win
Arthur Nagel vs Piet Luis Pinter Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W W L W W
Form
W L W L W W L W L LHead-2-Head: Nagel 1 - 0 Pinter
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nagel winning 2 and Pinter winning 0. The last match between Nagel and Pinter was at the M15 Antalya, 19-02-2025, Q3, Clay with Arthur Nagel getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Arthur Nagel | 1 |
| Piet Luis Pinter | 0 |
M15 Antalya(19-02-2025)
6
3
6
1
Upcoming Match
28 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Pegula PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
28 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Mensik VS Fritz PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
29 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Arthur Nagel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Arthur Nagel
Player
Damien Wenger
75%
(
69 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Andrea Bacaloni
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve %
73%
(
59 of
81)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Arthur Nagel
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
48%
(
31 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
55
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Jasza Szajrych
86%
(
62 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
1-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 2-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Arthur Nagel
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Gian Marco Ortenzi
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Niccolo Catini
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
52%
(
33 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 0-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Piet Luis Pinter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-7(4) 6-4 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Piet Luis Pinter
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Piet Luis Pinter
Player
Gokberk Saritas
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
51 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
68
|
6-0 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (68/39) | Win/Loss | 57% (26/20) |
| 60% (146/98) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (55/48) |
| 55% (1257/1041) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (525/468) |
| 0% (0/0) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 73% (44/16) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (26/20) |
| 51% (24/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 292 | Aces Total | 23 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 219 | Total Double Faults | 22 |
| 1:14:27 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 292.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 164.04 |
| 63% (3587/5654) | 1st Serve % | 62% (485/788) |
| 66% (2381/3587) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (293/485) |
| 50% (1024/2067) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (131/303) |
| 42% (247/584) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (31/66) |
| 41% (2241/5505) | Return Points Win % | 38% (306/798) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 64% (68/39) | Futures W/L | 57% (26/20) |
| 63% (66/105) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (25/45) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (11/24) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 17% (1/6) |
| 61% (19/31) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (8/12) |
| 91% (66/60) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (27/23) |
| 9% (66/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (27/4) |
| 18% (40/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (19/3) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Arthur Nagel
View full predicted draw for Nagel
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
