Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Arthur Nagel vs Mika Lipp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nagel vs Lipp analysis and find out who is favored!
Arthur Nagel vs Mika Lipp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nagel 1 - 0 Lipp
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nagel has won 51.06% of points on their second serve, while Lipp has won 49.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nagel, in recent form, has won 54.56% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lipp has won 55.81%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.66% and 33.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nagel has saved 54.55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lipp has saved 52.46% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nagel has won 60.47% of matches played (W/L 26/ 17), with Lipp winning 59.09% (W/L 26/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nagel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 72% (W/L 28/ 11), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 14/ 10). Lipp has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 35/ 30), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Nagel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.47% of matches (W/L 26/ 17), where as Lipp has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.47% of matches (W/L 26/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nagel winning 1 times and Lipp being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nagel winning 2 and Lipp winning 1. The last match between Nagel and Lipp was at the M15 Ueberlingen, 16-08-2024, Quarterfinals, Clay with Arthur Nagel getting the victory 2-6 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nagel and Lipp have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nagel winning 1 times and Lipp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nagel winning 0, and Lipp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nagel has played against opponents with an average rank of 265.95 while Lipp has played against players with an average rank of 238.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nagel has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lipp has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nagel has converted 47.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lipp has converted 45.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
62% (45-28)
Career Total W/L
53% (43-38)
68% (23-11)
YTD W/L
59% (23-16)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Arthur Nagel vs Mika Lipp For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Nagel VS Lipp
| stats | Arthur Nagel | Mika Lipp |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs Total | 4 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:5:0 | 2:5:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 77% (69/90) | 57% (39/68) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (49/69) | 62% (24/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (9/21) | 62% (18/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 22% (2/9) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (26/68) | 36% (32/90) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Arthur Nagel
Player
Mika Lipp
77%
(
69 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Arthur Nagel | Mika Lipp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (23/11) | 59% (23/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (50/28) | 59% (51/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (426/317) | 54% (449/386) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 68% (15/7) | 61% (23/15) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.27 | 0.07 |
| Aces Total | 98 | 28 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 77 | 58 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:45 | 1:11:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 232.65 | 268.74 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1219/1944) | 68% (1222/1787) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (832/1219) | 61% (747/1222) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (379/725) | 50% (281/565) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (97/214) | 47% (90/190) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (819/1927) | 42% (745/1762) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 68% (23/11) | 61% (23/15) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (22/33) | 59% (23/39) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (6/12) | 44% (4/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (22/18) | 91% (23/21) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (22/4) | 9% (23/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (11/4) | 13% (16/2) |
Arthur Nagel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Sven Corbinais
41%
(
24 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
4-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Tristan Berard
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Arthur Nagel
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
49
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Alex Finkelstein
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maximilian Homberg
Player
Arthur Nagel
62%
(
66 of
107)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
40 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Mika Lipp
77%
(
69 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Andre Steinbach
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Maxence Rivet
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simon Beaupain
Player
Arthur Nagel
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
82%
(
37 of
45)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Mika Lipp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Mika Lipp
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yan Sabanin
Player
Mika Lipp
45%
(
30 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
10
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
3
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
71
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 3-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 3-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Mika Lipp
79%
(
87 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
77 of
117)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
47 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
60 of
117)
123
Total Points Won
104
|
6-1 6-7(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mika Lipp
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Lipp
Player
Hong-Lin Fu
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Mika Lipp
77%
(
69 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mika Lipp
Player
Thanaphat Boosarawongse
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Lipp
Player
Hong-Lin Fu
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Mika Lipp
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
74%
(
71 of
96)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
Nagel Vs Lipp Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Nagel are available here and Lipp photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mika Lipp
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
