Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Arthur De Greef vs Enzo Couacaud Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Greef vs Couacaud analysis and find out who is favored!
Arthur De Greef vs Enzo Couacaud Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Greef has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Couacaud has won 48.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Greef, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Couacaud has won 47.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.89% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Greef has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Couacaud has saved 61.9% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Greef has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Couacaud winning 58.7% (W/L 27/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Greef has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 318/ 190), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Couacaud has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 185/ 76), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 50/ 47).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Greef winning 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Greef winning 4 and Couacaud winning 2. The last match between Greef and Couacaud was at the Prague Challenger, 16-08-2020, First, Clay with Arthur De Greef getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:33.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Greef and Couacaud have played a deciding set 0 times, with Greef winning 0 times and Couacaud 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Greef winning 0, and Couacaud 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Greef has played against opponents with an average rank of while Couacaud has played against players with an average rank of 229.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Greef has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Couacaud has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Greef has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Couacaud has converted 40.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Greef 2 - 1 Couacaud
Ret.
Rank
113
High
32
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
0
Hard0
2
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
196
Rank
151
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
60% (372-251)
Career Total W/L
61% (342-216)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
71% (15-6)
$140,200
Career Prize Money
$698,440
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Arthur De Greef | Enzo Couacaud |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 27 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:8:33 | 1:8:33 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (79/161) | 60% (87/146) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (56/79) | 61% (53/87) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (36/82) | 32% (19/59) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 52% (12/23) | 37% (7/19) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (74/146) | 43% (69/161) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Arthur De Greef
Player
Enzo Couacaud
34%
(
18 of
53)
1st Serve %
43%
(
18 of
42)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
| 6-0 6-3 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Arthur De Greef
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats
Arthur De Greef
Player
Enzo Couacaud
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
16 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Arthur De Greef | Enzo Couacaud |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (15/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 63% (33/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (259/229) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 82% (9/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.6 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 143 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 70 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:44:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 242.81 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (864/1501) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 77% (662/864) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (308/637) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 41% (62/153) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (654/1629) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (15/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (14/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 75% (6/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 44% (9/4) |
Arthur De Greef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Arthur De Greef
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Malek Jaziri
Player
Arthur De Greef
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur De Greef
Player
Vit Kopriva
45%
(
23 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Nouza
Player
Arthur De Greef
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tommy Robredo
Player
Arthur De Greef
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Arthur De Greef
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Enzo Couacaud Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
102)
11
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
23 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Gianluca Mager
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
47%
(
31 of
66)
10
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
7
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
26 of
31)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Enzo Couacaud
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
61%
(
61 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
14
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Andrea Collarini
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
94)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Emilio Gomez
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Greef Vs Couacaud Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
