Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Arthur Cazaux vs Pol MARTIN Tiffon Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cazaux vs Tiffon analysis and find out who is favored!
Arthur Cazaux vs Pol MARTIN Tiffon Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cazaux has won 53.73% of points on his second serve, while Tiffon has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cazaux, in recent form, has won 48.82% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tiffon has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.48% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cazaux has saved 62.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tiffon has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cazaux has won 59.72% of matches played (W/L 43/ 29), with Tiffon winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cazaux has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 74% (W/L 87/ 30), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 15/ 15). Tiffon has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Cazaux has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.89% of matches (W/L 31/ 14), where as Tiffon has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cazaux has played against opponents with an average rank of 212.07 while Tiffon has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cazaux has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tiffon has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cazaux has converted 35.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tiffon has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cazaux 0 - 0 Tiffon
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Arthur Cazaux | Pol MARTIN Tiffon |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (13/7) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (33/17) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (279/219) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (12/5) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.75 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 184 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 35 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:21 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 205.65 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (890/1496) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 77% (686/890) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (334/606) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (59/153) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (579/1539) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 57% (4/3) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 86% (6/1) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (10/14) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 1st Match |
Arthur Cazaux Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Arthur Cazaux
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
24 of
35)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
45%
(
18 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
39
Total Points Won
36
|
5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Arthur Cazaux
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 5-7 1-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Arthur Cazaux
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Adam Walton
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Arthur Cazaux
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Arthur Cazaux
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
7
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Lorenzo Musetti
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
12
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
9%
(
1 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
11 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Damir Dzumhur
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Arthur Cazaux
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
6
Aces
12
7
Double Faults
2
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Pol MARTIN Tiffon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Martin Krumich
35%
(
18 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
105)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
53%
(
27 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
57 of
105)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
67 of
123)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
51%
(
55 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
59 of
123)
111
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
50 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
65
|
6-0 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Marti Pujolras
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Lucas Bouquet
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Tristan Mccormick
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cezar Cretu
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
16 of
21)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Michael Vrbensky
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Cazaux Vs Tiffon Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
