Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Arthur Cazaux vs Dino Prizmic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cazaux vs Prizmic analysis and find out who is favored!
Arthur Cazaux vs Dino Prizmic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cazaux has won 53.73% of points on his second serve, while Prizmic has won 51.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cazaux, in recent form, has won 48.82% of his opponent's second serve points, while Prizmic has won 52.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.48% and 34.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cazaux has saved 62.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Prizmic has saved 58.42% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cazaux has won 59.72% of matches played (W/L 43/ 29), with Prizmic winning 54.55% (W/L 24/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cazaux has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 74% (W/L 87/ 30), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 15/ 15). Prizmic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 87% (W/L 27/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 14/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Cazaux has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.89% of matches (W/L 31/ 14), where as Prizmic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.17% of matches (W/L 16/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Cazaux winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Cazaux winning 2 and Prizmic winning 2. The last match between Cazaux and Prizmic was at the Split Challenger, 13-04-2023, Second, Clay with Dino Prizmic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:7.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cazaux and Prizmic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cazaux winning 0 times and Prizmic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cazaux winning 0, and Prizmic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cazaux has played against opponents with an average rank of 212.07 while Prizmic has played against players with an average rank of 251.16.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cazaux has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Prizmic has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cazaux has converted 35.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Prizmic has converted 39.34% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cazaux 1 - 1 Prizmic
75
Rank
74
High
21
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
190
Rank
155
High
18
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
64% (152-85)
Career Total W/L
66% (73-38)
65% (13-7)
YTD W/L
54% (7-6)
$466,125
Career Prize Money
$137,860
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Arthur Cazaux | Dino Prizmic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 19 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:7 | 1:32:7 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (52/88) | 65% (66/101) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (36/52) | 58% (38/66) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (21/36) | 54% (19/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 67% (4/6) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (44/101) | 35% (31/88) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Dino Prizmic
Player
Arthur Cazaux
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Dino Prizmic
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
9
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Arthur Cazaux | Dino Prizmic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (13/7) | 54% (7/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (33/17) | 51% (18/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (279/219) | 52% (170/156) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (12/5) | 67% (4/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 40% (2/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.75 | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 184 | 56 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 35 | 36 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:21 | 2:15:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 205.65 | 268.08 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (890/1496) | 64% (642/1003) |
| 1st Serve W% | 77% (686/890) | 67% (432/642) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (334/606) | 51% (185/361) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (59/153) | 39% (48/122) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (579/1539) | 42% (465/1114) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 75% (3/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 86% (6/1) | 50% (4/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (10/14) | 58% (7/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 29% (7/2) |
Arthur Cazaux Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Arthur Cazaux
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
24 of
35)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
45%
(
18 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
39
Total Points Won
36
|
5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Arthur Cazaux
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 5-7 1-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Arthur Cazaux
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Adam Walton
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Arthur Cazaux
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Arthur Cazaux
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
7
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Lorenzo Musetti
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
12
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
9%
(
1 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
11 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Damir Dzumhur
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Arthur Cazaux
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
6
Aces
12
7
Double Faults
2
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Dino Prizmic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jonas Forejtek
Player
Dino Prizmic
64%
(
74 of
116)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
50%
(
37 of
74)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
58 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(8) 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Michael Vrbensky
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Dino Prizmic
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Dino Prizmic
71%
(
69 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Antoine Escoffier
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Lloyd Harris
66%
(
63 of
96)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
3
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Dino Prizmic
58%
(
67 of
115)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
42%
(
20 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
49 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 6-7(12) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Dino Prizmic
60%
(
77 of
129)
1st Serve %
68%
(
84 of
123)
11
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
84)
62%
(
32 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
46 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
56 of
123)
139
Total Points Won
113
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Aziz Dougaz
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
5
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
4
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Cazaux Vs Prizmic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
