Arthur Bouquier vs Martin Landaluce Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W W L W L
Form
W W L W W W L L L LHead-to-head: Bouquier 1 - 0 Landaluce
They have played 3 sets in total, with Bouquier winning 2 and Landaluce winning 1. The last match between Bouquier and Landaluce was at the Pau Challenger, 17-02-2025, First, I.hard with Arthur Bouquier getting the victory 6-7(3) 6-3 7-5.
Pau Challenger(17-02-2025)
6
7
6
3
7
5
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(3) 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Martin Landaluce
68%
(
68 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
76 of
112)
20
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
49 of
76)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
34 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
1
19
Games Won
15
20
Aces (Total)
3
4
Total Double Faults
6
2:22:1
Average Match Time
2:22:1
68% (68/100)
1st Serve %
68% (76/112)
72% (49/68)
1st Serve Win %
64% (49/76)
53% (17/32)
2nd Serve Win %
56% (20/36)
45% (5/11)
Break Points Won % (Total)
40% (2/5)
38% (43/112)
Return Points Win %
34% (34/100)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (1/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Arthur Bouquier vs Martin Landaluce Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Arthur Bouquier 1 - 0 Martin Landaluce
Insights on the upcoming tennis match:
Recent form analysis reveals interesting predictions for the match at hand. Let's delve into the statistics to gain a better understanding of what lies ahead.
Second serve performance in recent form: In the last six months, Bouquier has demonstrated a remarkable ability on their second serve, winning an impressive 52.17% of points. In comparison, Landaluce has achieved a commendable 49.19% success rate. It is worth noting the substantial correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Return game stats in recent form: The return game statistics shed light on Bouquier's recent performance. They have displayed their prowess by winning 47.72% of their opponents' second serve points. Meanwhile, Landaluce has excelled with a 53.47% success rate in the same area. When considering first serve returns, Bouquier stands at 29.76% while Landaluce impresses with 31.03%. These percentages play a significant role in determining the favorite in their head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure analysis: When faced with high-pressure situations, Bouquier has shown resilience by saving an impressive 66.94% of breakpoints in recent matches. Landaluce has also demonstrated their mettle by saving 61.65% of breakpoints, which provides valuable insight for betting predictions during the game.
Performance overview: Looking back at the past year, Bouquier has proven to be a dominant force, with a remarkable 72.88% win rate in their matches (43 wins and 16 losses). On the other hand, Landaluce has attained a respectable 61.19% win rate (41 wins and 26 losses). These figures provide a comprehensive overview of their head-to-head prediction.
Best surface: Bouquier's career has seen their highest win percentage on the Hard surface, boasting an impressive 63% success rate (86 wins and 50 losses). However, their performance on Clay falls considerably, with a win percentage of only 20% (1 win and 4 losses). For Landaluce, their best performance comes on Hard courts, triumphing with a 64% win rate (39 wins and 22 losses). Comparatively, Landaluce struggles on Indoor Hard surfaces, with a win percentage of 46% (6 wins and 7 losses).
Player level: Analysis of their recent matches reveals that Bouquier has primarily participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments priced at $10K, garnering an impressive 73.68% win rate (28 wins and 10 losses). Conversely, Landaluce has mainly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K, maintaining a commendable 64.29% win rate (36 wins and 20 losses). It is imperative to consider the event level when comparing player statistics to predict the favorite.
Opponent quality stats: Over the course of the previous 12 months, Bouquier has faced opponents with an average rank of 395.29, while Landaluce has challenged players with an average rank of 243.82.
Deciding set performance: For live predictions and betting enthusiasts, it is crucial to assess players' performances in deciding sets. Bouquier has displayed a remarkable 65% success rate in such scenarios over the past year. In comparison, Landaluce has achieved a respectable 52% success rate in all matches played on tour.
Current event H2H stats: While past player performance holds significance in match prediction, it is equally vital to consider current event statistics to gauge the form of the players. Be sure to explore the section below for valuable insights if they have competed in the current event. Additionally, some players exhibit enhanced performance tailored to specific events, a factor to bear in mind when determining the outcome.
Break point conversion: The ability to capitalize on break point opportunities serves as a significant factor in live betting tips. Bouquier has displayed a conversion rate of 33.73%, while Landaluce has proven their prowess by converting 41.7% of their chances to break their opponents' serve.
If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this thought-provoking article provides a valuable starting point (Warning: Stats geeks only).
Arthur Bouquier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Arthur Bouquier
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
9
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
3
89%
(
39 of
44)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
43 of
54)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
46%
(
34 of
74)
13
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Borna Coric
Player
Arthur Bouquier
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
30 of
36)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Jurij Rodionov
59%
(
67 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
90 of
136)
23
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
55 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
64 of
90)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
29%
(
33 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
49 of
136)
130
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(2) 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Titouan Droguet
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
5
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Florian Broska
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
13
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Arthur Bouquier
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
20 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Murphy Cassone
68%
(
64 of
94)
1st Serve %
73%
(
77 of
105)
18
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
25 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
34 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 7-6(9) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Robin Bertrand
75%
(
81 of
108)
1st Serve %
65%
(
83 of
127)
30
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
78%
(
63 of
81)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
50 of
83)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
33%
(
36 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
49 of
127)
121
Total Points Won
114
|
5-7 7-6(3) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
view more
Martin Landaluce Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Martin Landaluce
68%
(
68 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
76 of
112)
20
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
49 of
76)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
34 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Martin Landaluce
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-7(2) 6-3 16-14 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Martin Landaluce
77%
(
63 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
14
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
8
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
18 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
0
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
7
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
James Kent Trotter
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
3
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
4
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Raphael Collignon
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Martin Landaluce
48%
(
30 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Dane Sweeny
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
10
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
61% (187/120)
Win/Loss
56% (73/58)
58% (410/293)
Sets Win/Loss
54% (171/143)
53% (3665/3261)
Games Win/Loss
52% (1551/1443)
63% (86/50)
Hard Win/Loss
64% (39/22)
20% (1/4)
Clay Win/Loss
50% (28/28)
60% (99/65)
Indoor Hard W/L
43% (6/8)
50% (1/1)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.54
Aces Per Game
0.34
1837
Aces Total
504
0.27
Double Faults Per Game
0.34
909
Total Double Faults
493
1:29:10
Average Match Time
1:51:56
444.28
Average Opponent Rank
330.77
63% (12457/19722)
1st Serve %
62% (5943/9520)
73% (9046/12457)
1st Serve Win %
69% (4089/5943)
49% (3535/7274)
2nd Serve Win %
49% (1759/3577)
39% (744/1896)
Break Points Won % (Total)
41% (408/1000)
38% (7559/19712)
Return Points Win %
40% (3877/9623)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
75% (3/1)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
25% (1/3)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/5)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
67% (22/11)
Challenger W/L
56% (42/33)
60% (165/109)
Futures W/L
64% (27/15)
61% (183/302)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
56% (72/129)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
50% (1/2)
46% (46/100)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
47% (20/43)
57% (54/95)
Deciding Set Win %
50% (25/50)
89% (174/155)
1st Set Won, Won Match
82% (72/59)
10% (174/18)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
18% (72/13)
23% (132/30)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
24% (59/14)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
