Arlinda Rushiti vs Tayisiya Morderger Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W W L L L
Form
L L L L L L L W L LHead-To-Head: Rushiti 1 - 0 Morderger
They have played 2 sets in total, with Rushiti winning 2 and Morderger winning 0. The last match between Rushiti and Morderger was at the W50 Nantes, 30-03-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: I.hard, with Arlinda Rushiti getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Arlinda Rushiti | 1 |
| Tayisiya Morderger | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W50 Nantes(30-03-2025)
Arlinda Rushiti
Tayisiya Morderger
6
3
6
4
| Rushiti | Stats | Morderger |
|---|---|---|
| 59% (19-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 10% (1-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 461 | Ranking | 894 |
| 352 | Highest Rank | 400 |
| 26 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 5 |
| 55% (253-205) | Career Total W/L | 56% (347-268) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $2,075 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Duckworth VS Bertola PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
17 May 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gauff VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
17 May 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
48%
(
22 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:12:52 | Average Match Time | 1:12:52 |
| 52% (24/46) | 1st Serve % | 52% (34/65) |
| 58% (14/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 41% (14/34) |
| 45% (10/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (13/31) |
| 54% (7/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (4/4) |
| 58% (38/65) | Return Points Win % | 48% (22/46) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rushiti vs Morderger Match Preview :
How does one predict the winner of a tennis match? Delve into the world of second-serve performance, where the numbers can reveal a promising tale. Over the past six months, Rushiti has captured 37.84% of points on their second serve, slightly edging out Morderger, who has won 37.53%. Such figures might seem minor, but they often hold the keys to accurate match predictions.
Now, let's explore the return game statistics. On their opponents' second serves, Rushiti has dominated with a win percentage of 54.34%, while Morderger lags at 49.01%. The distinction becomes clearer when examining first serve returns, as Rushiti seizes 34.5%, whereas Morderger trails with 27.03%. These stats provide significant insight into who might emerge favored in this head-to-head encounter.
When the pressure amplifies, Rushiti manages to save 45.51% of breakpoints, falling short of Morderger's superior 51.18%. Such numbers are invaluable for those invested in in-game betting predictions, revealing who can maintain composure when stakes are high.
Looking at the past year, Rushiti's impressive win record of 67.11% in matches (W/L 51/25) starkly contrasts with Morderger's 39.02% wins (W/L 16/25), offering a broader perspective of their head-to-head potential. Furthermore, on surfaces, Rushiti shines brightest on Hard courts with a 59% win rate (W/L 151/104) but struggles on Clay at 38% (W/L 31/51). Morderger, conversely, thrives on Clay with 57% wins (W/L 225/169), yet sees a downturn on indoor hard courts with 46% (W/L 46/54).
At the player level, within the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, Rushiti holds a commanding 67.39% (W/L 31/15) win rate over the last year, compared to Morderger's 38.46% (W/L 15/24). Event level relativity further influences favorite predictions, making these comparisons essential.
Considering opponent quality, Rushiti has been tested against competitors averaging a rank of 375.62, while Morderger has faced a tougher pool ranked at 332.73. When a match stretches into a deciding set, Rushiti prevails 50% of the time, outperforming Morderger, who secures only 33% of such outcomes.
In terms of breakpoint conversion, both players display prowess—Rushiti converts 43.02% of their opportunities, closely matched by Morderger's 42.42%. These figures are illuminating for those analyzing live matches, scanning for indications of who might capitalize under breakpoint pressure.
With these insights, who is predicted to claim victory? Rushiti's stats across multiple domains suggest an edge over Morderger. Whether it's through superior win percentages, second serve returns, or deciding set performances, Rushiti stands out as the likely winner in this gripping tennis face-off.
Rushiti vs Morderger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Arlinda Rushiti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ranah Akua Stoiber
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Hiromi Abe
55%
(
55 of
100)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
99)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
46 of
71)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
98
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Kamilla Bartone
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Nina Rudiukova
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
65 of
88)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Tayisiya Morderger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Luca Udvardy
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tayisiya Morderger
Player
Denisa Hindova
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
47%
(
25 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 3-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
44%
(
34 of
77)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
48%
(
22 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Urszula Radwanska
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Tayisiya Morderger
44%
(
21 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (253/205) | Win/Loss | 56% (347/268) |
| 54% (565/483) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (768/596) |
| 52% (5039/4685) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (6545/5648) |
| 59% (156/109) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (24/19) |
| 38% (31/51) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (226/172) |
| 59% (66/45) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (97/77) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 757 | Aces Total | 610 |
| 0.41 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1922 | Total Double Faults | 1330 |
| 1:17:24 | Average Match Time | 1:1:3 |
| 477.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 563.64 |
| 59% (15582/26405) | 1st Serve % | 55% (13760/24842) |
| 63% (9825/15582) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (8672/13760) |
| 42% (4512/10823) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (4920/11082) |
| 50% (1611/3248) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1575/3104) |
| 46% (12044/25925) | Return Points Win % | 47% (11363/24233) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 25% (2/6) |
| 54% (123/106) | Challenger W/L | 49% (159/168) |
| 57% (130/99) | Futures W/L | 66% (186/94) |
| 55% (248/453) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (343/609) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (49/90) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (57/111) |
| 53% (72/135) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (62/140) |
| 89% (242/215) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (363/316) |
| 11% (242/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (363/46) |
| 17% (216/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (252/30) |
Rushiti vs. Morderger Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
