Arjun Mahadevan vs Osman Torski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mahadevan vs Torski analysis and find out who is favored!
Arjun Mahadevan vs Osman Torski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mahadevan has won 43.04% of points on his second serve, while Torski has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mahadevan, in recent form, has won 56.31% of his opponent's second serve points, while Torski has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.81% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mahadevan has saved 53.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Torski has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mahadevan has won 34.62% of matches played (W/L 9/ 17), with Torski winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mahadevan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 32% (W/L 30/ 63), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 26% (W/L 8/ 23). Torski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 19/ 16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Mahadevan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 34.62% of matches (W/L 9/ 17), where as Torski has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mahadevan winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mahadevan winning 0 and Torski winning 2. The last match between Mahadevan and Torski was at the M15 Antalya, 11-02-2020, Q1 round, Clay with Osman Torski getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mahadevan and Torski have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mahadevan winning 0 times and Torski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mahadevan winning 0, and Torski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mahadevan has played against opponents with an average rank of 34.58 while Torski has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mahadevan has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Torski has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mahadevan has converted 38.1% of breakpoint opportunities, and Torski has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mahadevan 0 - 1 Torski
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
31% (38-86)
Career Total W/L
48% (23-25)
17% (1-5)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Arjun Mahadevan | Osman Torski |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 1 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-0 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Arjun Mahadevan | Osman Torski |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 17% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 17% (2/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 34% (32/63) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 17% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 17% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 17% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Arjun Mahadevan Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
David Pichler
Player
Arjun Mahadevan
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
20 of
40)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Arjun Mahadevan
Player
Yash Chaurasia
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
93%
(
13 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Aryan Shah
Player
Arjun Mahadevan
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Osman Torski Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Alexander Weis
Player
Osman Torski
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
38 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 5-7 11-9 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 |
Lenny Hampel
Player
Osman Torski
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Osman Torski
Player
John Sperle
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Osman Torski
Player
Kai Lemstra
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
58%
(
35 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
55
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 0-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Miljan Zekic
Player
Osman Torski
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more