Aristotelis Thanos vs John Hallquist Lithen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W W W W L W W L W L
Form
L L W L L W L L L LHead To Head: Thanos 1 - 0 Lithen
They have played 2 sets in total, with Thanos winning 2 and Lithen winning 0. The last match between Thanos and Lithen was at the M25 Varnamo, 11-06-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Aristotelis Thanos getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Aristotelis Thanos | 1 |
John Hallquist Lithen | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Varnamo(11-06-2025)
Thanos | Stats | Lithen |
---|---|---|
74% (14-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 36% (8-14) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
476 | Ranking | 899 |
476 | Highest Rank | 899 |
24 | Age | 23 |
- | Plays | - |
2 | Titles | 1 |
64% (126-72) | Career Total W/L | 54% (38-32) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Ruud VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
Schoolkate VS Shapovalov PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Aristotelis Thanos
Player
John Hallquist Lithen
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
82%
(
49 of
60)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 7 |
3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
7 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
2:0:8 | Average Match Time | 2:0:8 |
57% (47/83) | 1st Serve % | 82% (49/60) |
74% (35/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (29/49) |
50% (18/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 27% (3/11) |
80% (4/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 10% (1/10) |
47% (28/60) | Return Points Win % | 36% (30/83) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Thanos vs Lithen Match Preview :
- Lithen has a superior second serve performance over the last six months, winning 46.52% of points compared to Thanos' 39.38%. Could this give Lithen an edge when they're under pressure on their second serve? Possibly.
- When it comes to return games, Thanos is stronger on opponents' second serves, winning 55.62% of points compared to Lithen's 48.57%. Additionally, how does Thanos fare on first serve returns? Slightly lower than Lithen, with percentages of 31.66% and 33.17% respectively.
- Both players show resilience under breakpoint pressure, with Lithen saving 51.43% and Thanos saving 50%. Is there much difference here? Not significantly.
- Over the last year, Thanos has a higher win rate, securing 71.88% of matches compared to Lithen's 55.88%.
- Playing surface can impact performance; Lithen excels on Hard courts with a 60% win rate, whereas Thanos performs best on I.hard with a 71% win rate.
- Both have predominately participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K in the past year. Thanos achieved a higher winning percentage of 73.33% versus Lithen's 55.88%.
- Opponent quality may impact match outcomes. Lithen faced opponents with an average rank of 269.65, while Thanos faced less challenging opponents with an average rank of 455.38.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Thanos has a higher success rate, winning 83% compared to Lithen's 55% over the past 12 months. Does this improve Thanos' chances if the match is close? Undoubtedly.
- In terms of breakpoint conversion, Thanos outperforms Lithen, converting 40.54% of their opportunities as opposed to Lithen's 34.43%.
Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):
Lithen's ability to win points on their second serve suggests a solid defense under pressure, yet this may not be enough to secure a victory given the overall statistics.
Thanos demonstrates superior form in return games, especially against the second serve, which could provide a crucial advantage. Additionally, Thanos has shown dominance when the match reaches a deciding set.
Considering Thanos' higher win percentage over the past year and a better breakpoint conversion rate, the odds favor Thanos in this encounter.
Ultimately, based on these analyses, Thanos is the likely winner for this upcoming match.
Thanos vs Lithen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Aristotelis Thanos Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jay Dylan Hara Friend
Player
Aristotelis Thanos
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
49%
(
44 of
89)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
8
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Aristotelis Thanos
Player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
58%
(
72 of
125)
1st Serve %
64%
(
78 of
122)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
51%
(
27 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
42%
(
52 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
122)
128
Total Points Won
119
|
4-6 7-6(0) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Aristotelis Thanos
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Aristotelis Thanos
Player
Carlo Alberto Caniato
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
79)
73
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Aristotelis Thanos
Player
Ryan Nijboer
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Marvin Moeller
Player
Aristotelis Thanos
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Aristotelis Thanos
Player
Michiel De Krom
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Aristotelis Thanos
Player
Boris Fassbender
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(5) 6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H |
view more
John Hallquist Lithen Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mariano Dedura-Palomero
Player
John Hallquist Lithen
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
75%
(
30 of
40)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
John Hallquist Lithen
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
14 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Brian Bozemoj
Player
John Hallquist Lithen
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
77%
(
46 of
60)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Lilian Marmousez
Player
John Hallquist Lithen
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
8 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
John Hallquist Lithen
Player
Stijn Paardekooper
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
68%
(
81 of
120)
2
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
51 of
81)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
38 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
120)
115
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Aristotelis Thanos
Player
John Hallquist Lithen
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
82%
(
49 of
60)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Emilien Demanet
Player
John Hallquist Lithen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
John Hallquist Lithen
Player
Gabriele Maria Noce
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
64% (126/72) | Win/Loss | 54% (38/32) |
61% (270/170) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (84/74) |
55% (2283/1834) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (759/709) |
59% (63/44) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) |
69% (53/24) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (33/28) |
71% (10/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) |
0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
400 | Aces Total | 51 |
0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
584 | Total Double Faults | 106 |
1:9:28 | Average Match Time | 1:14:19 |
367.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 353.63 |
60% (5008/8385) | 1st Serve % | 67% (2359/3502) |
67% (3350/5008) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (1391/2359) |
46% (1546/3377) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (537/1143) |
47% (438/923) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (161/374) |
43% (3559/8255) | Return Points Win % | 41% (1373/3351) |
67% (4/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
67% (2/1) | Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) |
63% (120/69) | Futures W/L | 55% (37/30) |
64% (123/191) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (37/69) |
100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
57% (26/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (5/15) |
62% (28/45) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (9/17) |
92% (116/107) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (36/33) |
8% (116/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (36/3) |
24% (82/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (34/5) |
Thanos vs. Lithen Prediction Form Trend:

Other Predictions
- Loading news...