Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Antonia Schmidt vs Yarden Akler Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schmidt vs Akler analysis and find out who is favored!
Antonia Schmidt vs Yarden Akler Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schmidt has won 49.24% of points on his second serve, while Akler has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schmidt, in recent form, has won 56.3% of his opponent's second serve points, while Akler has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.95% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schmidt has saved 55.82% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Akler has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schmidt has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 40/ 25), with Akler winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schmidt has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 34/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Akler has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 19/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Schmidt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.81% of matches (W/L 24/ 19), where as Akler has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Schmidt winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Schmidt winning 2 and Akler winning 0. The last match between Schmidt and Akler was at the W15 Antalya, 12-01-2021, Q3, Clay with Antonia Schmidt getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Schmidt and Akler have played a deciding set 0 times, with Schmidt winning 0 times and Akler 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Schmidt winning 1, and Akler 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schmidt has played against opponents with an average rank of 241.25 while Akler has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schmidt has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Akler has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schmidt has converted 50.84% of breakpoint opportunities, and Akler has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Schmidt 1 - 0 Akler
548
Rank
525
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
56% (128-101)
Career Total W/L
38% (50-83)
67% (16-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Antonia Schmidt | Yarden Akler |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Antonia Schmidt | Yarden Akler |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (16/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (34/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (275/238) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (12/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.31 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 78 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 74 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:5 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 265.29 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1057/1650) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (701/1057) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (281/593) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (92/175) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (707/1608) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 70% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (16/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (15/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Antonia Schmidt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Malene Helgo
Player
Antonia Schmidt
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Nina Vargova
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Julia Middendorf
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
46%
(
16 of
35)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Antonia Schmidt
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Emeline Dartron
48%
(
38 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
1-6 7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Antonia Schmidt
79%
(
84 of
107)
1st Serve %
66%
(
93 of
140)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
50 of
93)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
42%
(
45 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
66 of
140)
128
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Antonia Schmidt
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Elena Ruxandra Bertea
60%
(
68 of
113)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
49 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
101
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hong Yi Cody Wong
Player
Antonia Schmidt
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Zixuan Zeng
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Yarden Akler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Diana Nekhorosheva
Player
Yarden Akler
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
12
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
38 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Yarden Akler
Player
Nikol Mishieva
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Deanne Choo
Player
Yarden Akler
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
10
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Milan Krish
Player
Yarden Akler
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Risa Ushijima
Player
Yarden Akler
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yarden Akler
Player
Kanyanut Sudsaard
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
6
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michelle Yeo
Player
Yarden Akler
45%
(
29 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
0
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
6
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 7-6(8) | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Schmidt Vs Akler Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
