I. Yamazaki
To Win
M. Matsuda
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W L W L LForm
L W L W W L L W L WThey have played 2 sets in total, with Schmidt winning 2 and Yamazaki winning 0. The last match between Schmidt and Yamazaki was at the W35 Santa Margherita di Pula, 10-04-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Antonia Schmidt getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Antonia Schmidt | 1 |
Ikumi Yamazaki | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Santa Margherita di Pula(10-04-2025)
Schmidt | Stats | Yamazaki |
---|---|---|
66% (19-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 59% (16-11) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
411 | Ranking | 432 |
397 | Highest Rank | 402 |
23 | Age | 23 |
- | Plays | - |
4 | Titles | 1 |
57% (168-128) | Career Total W/L | 62% (119-74) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
22 May 2025 / Second
Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat wta
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
French Open - Paris atp
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-0 |
![]() ![]()
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 4 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:30:9 | Average Match Time | 1:30:9 |
52% (24/46) | 1st Serve % | 55% (28/51) |
79% (19/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (16/28) |
64% (14/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (8/23) |
56% (5/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
53% (27/51) | Return Points Win % | 28% (13/46) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The upcoming tennis match between Schmidt and Yamazaki presents an intriguing battle given their recent performances. Among the key indicators of their potential success is their performance on second serves over the past six months, with Schmidt achieving a win percentage of 40.85% compared to Yamazaki's 40.06%. This correlation with match prediction accuracy suggests a very narrow margin between the two players in their respective serving capabilities.
When examining return game statistics, Yamazaki boasts a superior record, having won 57.09% of their opponent's second serve points in recent form, while Schmidt managed 50.25%. Their prowess against the first serve also favors Yamazaki who has a return win percentage of 38.52% against Schmidt’s 30.52%. These statistics suggest that Yamazaki may possess an edge in return games.
In terms of handling pressure situations, Schmidt has demonstrated stronger skills, saving 50.17% of breakpoints faced, compared to Yamazaki's 43.01%. This ability is crucial in determining in-game betting outcomes. However, in terms of breakpoint conversion, Yamazaki slightly edges out Schmidt with a conversion rate of 39.83% against Schmidt’s 39.01%.
Evaluating their performances over the last year, Yamazaki holds a slight advantage in match victories, with a win percentage of 63.77% (W/L 44/25), compared to Schmidt's 60.32% (W/L 38/25). Furthermore, in the critical races to win deciding sets, Schmidt has shown a resilient performance winning 72% of such sets, which surpasses Yamazaki’s 59% success rate.
Both players have primarily competed in Challengers/ITF circuits, with Schmidt securing 57.89% of victories, and Yamazaki winning 63.49%. Additionally, the quality of opposition reveals that Schmidt has faced slightly tougher competitors with an average rank of 412.94, compared to Yamazaki’s average opponent rank of 444.74.
Their preferences on different surfaces also reflect variance in strengths; Schmidt has a solid performance on hard courts with a win percentage of 60%, whereas Yamazaki holds an unblemished record on grass with a 100% win rate. These factors, combined with the current condition stats of events, provide critical insights for predictions.
Taking into account all these comparative statistics, Yamazaki appears to hold a slight overall advantage leading into this match. Their superior return game and slightly better performance metrics on average hint towards them emerging victorious over Schmidt in this closely contested match-up.
Schmidt vs Yamazaki Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jazmin Ortenzi
Player
Antonia Schmidt
54%
(
42 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Georgia Pedone
Player
Antonia Schmidt
85%
(
63 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
54%
(
40 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
53 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Iva Ivanova
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ksenia Efremova
Player
Antonia Schmidt
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Cristina Dinu
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
43%
(
13 of
30)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
61
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Emma Lene
Player
Antonia Schmidt
76%
(
68 of
89)
1st Serve %
53%
(
54 of
101)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
9
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
88
Total Points Won
102
|
2-6 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Sarah Iliev
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Gaeul Jang
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
50%
(
18 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Wushuang Zheng
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Nanari Katsumi
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hanyu Guo
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Xiaodi You
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Jenna Defalco
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve %
79%
(
54 of
68)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Jing-Jing Lu
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
3-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
57% (168/128) | Win/Loss | 62% (119/74) |
55% (364/303) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (259/179) |
52% (3254/2960) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2132/1852) |
60% (47/31) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (51/39) |
56% (104/82) | Clay Win/Loss | 68% (46/22) |
53% (17/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (15/13) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 100% (7/0) |
0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
472 | Aces Total | 126 |
0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
895 | Total Double Faults | 517 |
1:21:54 | Average Match Time | 1:26:36 |
421.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 416.06 |
62% (9159/14655) | 1st Serve % | 69% (7159/10403) |
63% (5776/9159) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (4116/7159) |
45% (2499/5496) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1412/3244) |
46% (812/1771) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (722/1449) |
45% (6477/14510) | Return Points Win % | 48% (5116/10626) |
54% (75/64) | Challenger W/L | 61% (91/57) |
59% (93/64) | Futures W/L | 62% (28/17) |
57% (165/292) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (116/189) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
55% (32/58) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (17/27) |
61% (48/79) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (31/53) |
89% (166/147) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (107/98) |
11% (166/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (107/9) |
16% (130/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (85/21) |