Prediction of Antonia Ruzic [116th] vs Xinyu Gao [147th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W W L W W W W W L L
Form
W L W L L L W L W LHead-To-Head: Ruzic 1 - 0 Gao
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ruzic winning 2 and Gao winning 0. The last match between Ruzic and Gao was at the W75 Trnava, 25-02-2025, First, I.hard with Antonia Ruzic getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Antonia Ruzic | 1 |
Xinyu Gao | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Xinyu Gao
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 6 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:28:42 | Average Match Time | 1:28:42 |
67% (36/54) | 1st Serve % | 71% (35/49) |
64% (23/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 43% (15/35) |
44% (8/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (5/14) |
75% (6/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
59% (29/49) | Return Points Win % | 43% (23/54) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Antonia Ruzic vs Xinyu Gao Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ruzic 1 - 0 Gao
Editorial Prediction:
The upcoming tennis match between Ruzic and Gao presents a fascinating opportunity for analytical examination through their respective statistics. A crucial aspect of predicting match outcomes is understanding the second serve performance, where Gao holds a slight edge with a 49.8% win rate in recent times compared to Ruzic's 48.52%. Such metrics often correlate highly with the accuracy of match predictions, providing insight into who might hold the advantage.
In terms of return game efficacy, Ruzic shows slight dominance over Gao by winning 56.28% of their opponent’s second serve points, while Gao's corresponding figure is 56.01%. When examining first serve returns, Gao edges out Ruzic ever so slightly, winning 41.48% to Ruzic's 41.3%. These figures provide essential data points when identifying the favored player in this head-to-head competition.
Under pressure situations often define matches, and both players exhibit resilience on breakpoint saves. Ruzic has managed to fend off 52.85% of breakpoints, whereas Gao proves to be slightly more proficient with a 55.93% save rate. This could play a decisive role in the match and is a critical stat for considering in-game betting predictions.
Analyzing their overall performance overview over the past year, Gao boasts a higher match success rate with victories in 67.69% of their contests (W/L 44/21), compared to Ruzic’s 61.02% (W/L 36/23). This provides an overarching view of their head-to-head standing. The players' performance on different surfaces can potentially influence the match outcome as well. Ruzic shines on hard courts, displaying a career win rate of 75% (W/L 73/24), while Gao excels on clay with a 69% success rate (W/L 33/15).
Both players have predominantly competed at the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K level. Gao excels with a 76.09% win rate (W/L 35/11), bettering Ruzic who holds a 61.9% win rate (W/L 26/16). The quality of opponents also paints a clearer picture: in the last 12 months, Ruzic faced opponents with an average rank of 235.03, while Gao's adversaries averaged a rank of 250.45, suggesting Ruzic might have been tested against slightly tougher competition.
If this match ventures into a deciding set, historical performance points to Gao having the upper hand, winning 57% of such sets compared to Ruzic’s 53%. Moreover, circumstantial factors like tournament-specific performances and current event statistics might further influence predictions when the event is in progress.
Finally, evaluating the breakpoint conversion rates offers insights into potential in-game shifts. Ruzic displays superior conversion rates, converting 54.46% of breakpoint opportunities, compared to Gao's 49.44%. Each of these metrics informs our holistic assessment of the players.
Given the statistical findings across multiple fronts, Gao seems to have a slight edge heading into this matchup. While Ruzic possesses strengths of their own, Gao’s consistent performance across various parameters suggests they are well-poised to secure victory in this encounter.
Antonia Ruzic Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Eva Vedder
Player
Antonia Ruzic
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Julia Avdeeva
Player
Antonia Ruzic
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
15
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
0
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Linda Klimovicova
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
49%
(
34 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Lina Gjorcheska
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Kaja Juvan
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Mia Ristic
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
82%
(
41 of
50)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Karina Miller
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
74%
(
51 of
69)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Tereza Valentova
Player
Antonia Ruzic
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Tamara Korpatsch
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Xinyu Gao Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Astra Sharma
Player
Xinyu Gao
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Xinyu Gao
Player
Anastasiia Gureva
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
24 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Xinyu Gao
82%
(
73 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
38 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Xinyu Gao
Player
Celine Naef
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Xinyu Gao
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
76%
(
59 of
78)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Xinyu Gao
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Destanee Aiava
Player
Xinyu Gao
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
60 of
82)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Xinyu Gao
Player
Jesika Maleckova
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
51%
(
61 of
120)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
10
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
108
Total Points Won
110
|
7-5 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Xinyu Gao
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Xinyu Gao
Player
Amandine Hesse
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
68% (182/86) | Win/Loss | 62% (256/157) |
64% (392/224) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (565/384) |
56% (3069/2424) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4594/3964) |
0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
344 | Aces Total | 579 |
0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
717 | Total Double Faults | 900 |
1:30:16 | Average Match Time | 1:17:21 |
302.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 472.52 |
66% (10844/16474) | 1st Serve % | 63% (13122/20820) |
61% (6563/10844) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (7891/13122) |
48% (2702/5633) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3559/7698) |
51% (1099/2143) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1322/2758) |
48% (7768/16181) | Return Points Win % | 47% (9707/20653) |
68% (179/265) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (250/402) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
56% (25/45) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (42/75) |
63% (51/81) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (72/128) |
90% (177/160) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (252/221) |
10% (177/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (252/30) |
24% (91/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (161/34) |
Other Predictions
- Loading news...