Antoine Hoang vs Daniil Glinka Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L W L L L L
Form
W W L W W W W W W LHead-to-head: Hoang 1 - 1 Glinka
They have played 5 sets in total, with Hoang winning 3 and Glinka winning 2. The last match between Hoang and Glinka was at the M25 Trento, 18-02-2025, First, I.hard with Daniil Glinka getting the victory 3-6 7-5 6-0.
M25 Trento(18-02-2025)
3
6
7
5
6
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-5 6-0 |
Stats 
Daniil Glinka
Player
Antoine Hoang
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| 7-6(2) 6-4 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Daniil Glinka
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
5
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
1
3
Sets Won
2
24
Games Won
26
12
Aces (Total)
12
10
Total Double Faults
7
2:5:3
Average Match Time
2:5:3
67% (99/147)
1st Serve %
56% (75/133)
75% (74/99)
1st Serve Win %
73% (55/75)
42% (20/48)
2nd Serve Win %
52% (30/58)
45% (5/11)
Break Points Won % (Total)
38% (5/13)
36% (48/133)
Return Points Win %
36% (53/147)
50% (1/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
50% (1/2)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win %
100% (1/1)
50% (2/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
50% (2/1)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
50% (2/1)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Antoine Hoang vs Daniil Glinka Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Antoine Hoang 1 - 1 Daniil Glinka
- Recent second serve performance: In the past six months, Hoang has demonstrated a 45.69% success rate on their second serve, while Glinka boasts a slightly higher percentage of 49.01%. This particular statistic showcases a strong correlation with match prediction accuracy.
- Return game statistics in recent form: Recent return stats reveal that Hoang has triumphed in 53.99% of their opponent's second serve points, while Glinka possesses a success rate of 49.02%. Turning our attention towards first serve returns, Hoang has achieved a 31.77% success rate, whereas Glinka stands at 32.51%. These figures carry a significant correlation in determining the favored player in this imminent head-to-head encounter.
- Under pressure analysis: Examining their ability to handle pressure situations, Hoang has successfully saved 58.02% of breakpoints in recent matches, in comparison to Glinka's 55.71%. This statistical aspect proves invaluable for bettors seeking accurate predictions during live gameplay.
- Performance overview: Considering their performance over the course of the last year, Hoang has secured victory in 50% of matches played (with a win-loss ratio of 16/16), while Glinka has emerged triumphant in 59.09% of matches (with a win-loss ratio of 39/27). These facts offer us an overarching overview of the predicted outcome of their head-to-head encounter.
- Preferred surface: Hoang showcases their greatest career surface win percentage on clay, with an impressive 59% success rate (141 wins out of 100 matches). However, on hard surfaces, Hoang's performance weakens slightly, achieving a win percentage of 55% (63 wins out of 51 matches). Conversely, Glinka thrives on indoor hard surfaces, boasting a 56% career win percentage (58 wins out of 46 matches), and struggles on clay surfaces, attaining a win percentage of 47% (26 wins out of 29 matches).
- Player level: In the past year, Hoang has primarily competed in Futures, Satellites, and ITF tournaments with a $10K prize, successfully winning 53.33% of matches (with a win-loss ratio of 16/14). Glinka, on the other hand, has predominantly participated in the same level of tournaments, triumphing in 66.67% of matches (with a win-loss ratio of 34/17). Comparing these players' statistics to predict the favored contender, we must take into account their respective levels of competition.
- Direct head-to-head matches: To date, Hoang has faced Glinka once, emerging victorious on that occasion, while Glinka has failed to secure a win against Hoang. The total number of sets played stands at two, with Hoang claiming victory in both. Their most recent encounter occurred at the M25 Trimbach on March 16, 2024, in the semifinals on a carpet court, resulting in Antoine Hoang's triumph with a scoreline of 7-6(2) 6-4.
- Head-to-head match duration: Previous head-to-head matches between these players have, on average, lasted for 1 hour, 56 minutes, and 0 seconds.
- Prediction in deciding sets: Throughout their history, Hoang and Glinka have not played any deciding sets against each other. Consequently, there is no data to suggest a winner in the event of this match requiring a deciding set.
- Head-to-head in extreme pressure situations: One tiebreak has taken place between these players, resulting in Hoang emerging victorious on that occasion, while Glinka was unable to claim a win.
- Opponent quality statistics: Over the past 12 months, Hoang has faced opponents with an average rank of 441.53, whereas Glinka has played against players with an average rank of 413.44.
- Performance in deciding sets against all players: In the previous 12 months, Hoang has successfully won 38% of deciding sets, whereas Glinka has achieved a slightly higher percentage of 42% in all matches played on the professional tour. These figures become particularly relevant if this match ventures into a deciding set.
- Current event head-to-head statistics: While past player performances offer valuable insights for predicting tennis matches, current event statistics should also be taken into account to gauge a player's current form. For more detailed information, please refer to the section below (if applicable to the current event). Furthermore, certain players may exhibit superior performances at specific events, which must be considered when predicting the outcome.
- Break point conversion: Recent data illustrates that Hoang has effectively converted 45.31% of their breakpoint opportunities, whereas Glinka has achieved a conversion rate of 35.07% when presented with chances to break their opponent's serve. This statistic proves decisive for in-game live betting tips, particularly when either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you possess an interest in models that accurately predict tennis matches, this article provides a solid starting point (Disclaimer: Recommended for statistics enthusiasts only).
Antoine Hoang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Antoine Hoang
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Antoine Hoang
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
0%
(
0 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
58
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pierre Delage
Player
Antoine Hoang
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
101)
10
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
7
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Theo Papamalamis
Player
Antoine Hoang
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Ignasi Forcano
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Theo Papamalamis
Player
Antoine Hoang
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Milan Welte
66%
(
63 of
96)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
12
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
32 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
104
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Nicolas Colne
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
Player
Antoine Hoang
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniil Glinka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Raphael Perot
Player
Daniil Glinka
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve %
67%
(
14 of
21)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
11 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
20
Total Points Won
18
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Charlie Camus
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Dominic Stricker
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Tim Handel
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
62%
(
73 of
117)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
116)
17
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
1
84%
(
61 of
73)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
66 of
76)
66%
(
29 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
27 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
21%
(
24 of
116)
114
Total Points Won
119
|
7-6(8) 6-7(1) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Matthew William Donald
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Luc Wieland
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Daniil Glinka
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
78%
(
28 of
36)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
44
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Dan Added
64%
(
71 of
111)
1st Serve %
55%
(
62 of
113)
11
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
54 of
71)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
46 of
62)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
32%
(
36 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
41 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Luca Castagnola
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
11
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
58% (388/285)
Win/Loss
54% (194/166)
57% (907/694)
Sets Win/Loss
54% (446/379)
53% (8033/7259)
Games Win/Loss
52% (4172/3817)
55% (63/51)
Hard Win/Loss
51% (85/81)
59% (141/100)
Clay Win/Loss
47% (26/29)
58% (170/123)
Indoor Hard W/L
60% (83/56)
56% (14/11)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.24
Aces Per Game
0.4
1825
Aces Total
1582
0.24
Double Faults Per Game
0.21
1800
Total Double Faults
834
1:27:25
Average Match Time
1:20:17
499.25
Average Opponent Rank
433.06
68% (26547/38989)
1st Serve %
61% (12117/19912)
69% (18316/26547)
1st Serve Win %
71% (8640/12117)
50% (6278/12442)
2nd Serve Win %
52% (4023/7795)
43% (1629/3789)
Break Points Won % (Total)
41% (760/1857)
40% (15725/39779)
Return Points Win %
38% (7747/20176)
48% (14/15)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
100% (1/0)
38% (15/24)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
51% (108/103)
Challenger W/L
42% (22/30)
64% (251/142)
Futures W/L
56% (171/136)
57% (376/654)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
54% (191/356)
58% (7/12)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
51% (116/229)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
44% (52/118)
47% (114/244)
Deciding Set Win %
44% (48/109)
84% (372/313)
1st Set Won, Won Match
80% (211/169)
15% (372/57)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
20% (211/42)
24% (301/73)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
16% (149/24)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
