Anouk Koevermans vs Maria Sakkari Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W L W L L
Form
W L L W L L W L W LHead To Head: Koevermans 0 - 1 Sakkari
They have played 2 sets in total, with Koevermans winning 0 and Sakkari winning 2. The last match between Koevermans and Sakkari was at the Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch, 11-06-2025, Round: First, Surface: Grass, with Maria Sakkari getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anouk Koevermans | 0 |
| Maria Sakkari | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch(11-06-2025)
Maria Sakkari
Anouk Koevermans
6
3
6
4
| Koevermans | Stats | Sakkari |
|---|---|---|
| 44% (12-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (16-20) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 198 | Ranking | 88 |
| 178 | Highest Rank | 3 |
| 21 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 9 |
| 60% (157-104) | Career Total W/L | 60% (490-329) |
| $84,500 | Career Prize Money | $9,277,691 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shevchenko VS Bublik PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
17 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rublev VS Nava PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Koevermans VS Sakkari H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Maria Sakkari
Player
Anouk Koevermans
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Koevermans VS Sakkari H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 7 | Games Won | 12 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:29:57 | Average Match Time | 1:29:57 |
| 66% (44/67) | 1st Serve % | 52% (30/58) |
| 57% (25/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (22/30) |
| 39% (9/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (15/28) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 36% (21/58) | Return Points Win % | 49% (33/67) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Koevermans vs Sakkari Match Preview :
- In the last 6 months, Sakkari's performance on second serves is slightly better, winning 40.05% of points, compared to Koevermans' 39.79%.
- Who has the edge in returning second serves? Sakkari seems to, with a success rate of 49.64%, marginally ahead of Koevermans at 48.02%.
- For first serve returns, Koevermans outperforms Sakkari, capturing 33.15% of points as opposed to Sakkari's 31.08%.
- Under pressure, both players have similar breakpoint save percentages, with Koevermans slightly ahead at 50.23% compared to Sakkari's 50%.
- Looking at overall performance over the last year, Koevermans shows a stronger win rate of 62.86%, while Sakkari has a 44.74% win rate.
- Sakkari excels on clay surfaces with a 63% win rate, whereas Koevermans prefers indoor hard courts, boasting a 62% win rate.
- Consider the level of competition faced; Sakkari has played more on the Main tour with an average opponent rank of 84.29, while Koevermans has played mainly in Challengers/ITF events with opponents ranked around 324.66 on average.
- In deciding sets, Koevermans has a notable edge, winning 50% of them, versus Sakkari's 33% win rate in the last year.
- Koevermans demonstrates superior break point conversion, successfully converting 47.41% of opportunities, compared to Sakkari's 37.74%.
Editorial Prediction (June 10, 2025, UTC):
This upcoming match presents a classic clash of recent form and career accomplishments. While Sakkari has shown consistency in her serve and a solid performance history on clay courts, her recent form in deciding sets and break point conversion suggests vulnerability.
Koevermans, in contrast, has demonstrated an impressive performance in Challengers with a high win percentage and has the advantage in first serve returns and break point conversions. Despite facing lower-ranked opponents most of the year, her ability to handle pressure situations and convert critical opportunities gives her a competitive edge.
Taking into account all these factors, Koevermans is poised as the likely winner in this anticipated tennis matchup.
Koevermans vs Sakkari Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Anouk Koevermans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Anouk Koevermans
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Anouk Koevermans
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Shuo Feng
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
20 of
34)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
23%
(
3 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Anouk Koevermans
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Jessika Ponchet
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Anouk Koevermans
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Anouk Koevermans
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
47
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Federica Urgesi
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
37 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Maria Sakkari Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Maria Sakkari
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Anna Blinkova
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Alexandrova
Player
Maria Sakkari
64%
(
71 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
13
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
5
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
44 of
53)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
31%
(
34 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
25 of
85)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Yulia Putintseva
50%
(
54 of
109)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
51%
(
28 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
44 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
85)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Maria Sakkari
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
9
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Maria Sakkari
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Anouk Koevermans
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Maria Sakkari
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
37 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (157/104) | Win/Loss | 60% (490/329) |
| 58% (347/247) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (1094/779) |
| 54% (2950/2550) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (9107/7944) |
| 61% (36/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (241/168) |
| 61% (99/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (185/110) |
| 62% (21/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (32/25) |
| 20% (1/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 55% (32/26) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 360 | Aces Total | 1719 |
| 0.53 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1426 | Total Double Faults | 1805 |
| 1:34:8 | Average Match Time | 1:7:48 |
| 252 | Average Opponent Rank | 391.07 |
| 61% (9448/15380) | 1st Serve % | 62% (23812/38608) |
| 62% (5842/9448) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (15364/23812) |
| 40% (2351/5932) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (6991/14784) |
| 51% (1102/2171) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2095/4701) |
| 49% (7601/15536) | Return Points Win % | 44% (17086/38694) |
| 40% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 60% (59/39) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 60% (103/69) |
| 33% (1/2) | Cups W/L | 44% (4/5) |
| 0% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 54% (122/102) |
| 63% (98/58) | Challenger W/L | 59% (85/58) |
| 60% (56/38) | Futures W/L | 68% (117/56) |
| 60% (156/260) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (482/806) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 54% (31/57) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (92/166) |
| 53% (39/73) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (122/240) |
| 87% (159/138) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (484/424) |
| 13% (159/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (484/60) |
| 19% (102/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (335/66) |
Koevermans vs. Sakkari Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
