Anouk Koevermans vs Justina Mikulskyte Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W L W L L
Form
L W L L W W L L W LHead-To-Head: Koevermans 0 - 1 Mikulskyte
They have played 2 sets in total, with Koevermans winning 0 and Mikulskyte winning 2. The last match between Koevermans and Mikulskyte was at the French Open - Paris, 22-05-2025, Round: Q2 round, Surface: Clay, with Justina Mikulskyte getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anouk Koevermans | 0 |
| Justina Mikulskyte | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(22-05-2025)
Justina Mikulskyte
Anouk Koevermans
7
6
6
2
| Koevermans | Stats | Mikulskyte |
|---|---|---|
| 45% (10-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (19-14) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 190 | Ranking | 209 |
| 178 | Highest Rank | 203 |
| 21 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 7 |
| 61% (155-101) | Career Total W/L | 58% (263-187) |
| $43,000 | Career Prize Money | $2,000 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fearnley VS Moutet PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shapovalov VS Cobolli PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Koevermans VS Mikulskyte H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-2 |
Stats 
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Anouk Koevermans
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Koevermans VS Mikulskyte H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 8 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:54:0 | Average Match Time | 1:54:0 |
| 57% (37/65) | 1st Serve % | 71% (44/62) |
| 62% (23/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (27/44) |
| 43% (12/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 72% (13/18) |
| 67% (2/3) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 57% (4/7) |
| 35% (22/62) | Return Points Win % | 46% (30/65) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Koevermans vs Mikulskyte Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Koevermans has a slight edge with 39.85% of points won on second serves compared to Mikulskyte's 38.19%. This stat is crucial for predicting the match outcome. Does this give Koevermans an advantage? Yes, albeit slight.
- Return Game Efficiency: When it comes to returning second serves, Mikulskyte is marginally better with 49.94%, while Koevermans follows with 49.36%. This pattern reverses slightly on first serve returns with Mikulskyte leading again at 33.05% over Koevermans' 31.3%.
- Handling Pressure: Mikulskyte exhibits marginal superiority by saving 54.15% of breakpoints compared to Koevermans' 53.85%. Could this impact the match? Likely so, in critical moments.
- Overall Match Wins: Over the past year, Koevermans has a higher win percentage at 65.75% compared to Mikulskyte's 59.26%, indicating more consistent performance.
- Surface Strengths: Both players have shown their best career performance on hard courts, each winning 62% of matches. Interestingly, neither has succeeded on grass, with zero wins.
- Tournament Level Performance: Koevermans shows a better win rate in ITF/Challengers > $10K tournaments at 67.14% versus Mikulskyte's 59.21%.
- Quality of Opposition: Koevermans has faced slightly tougher opponents with an average rank of 322.58, compared to Mikulskyte’s 344.12.
- Deciding Set Performance: Mikulskyte excels in deciding sets, winning 73% of them as opposed to Koevermans' 54%. How significant is this for live betting? Quite significant, if the match goes to a deciding set.
- Break Point Conversion: Mikulskyte again has a slight edge, converting 45.27% of break points, surpassing Koevermans’ 44.44%.
Editorial Prediction (May 21, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match features two players with closely matched statistics, each showcasing unique strengths. Koevermans demonstrates a minor advantage in second serve performance and overall match consistency with a slightly higher win percentage over the past year.
Nevertheless, Mikulskyte's proficiency in returning serves and handling pressure through break-point resilience could prove decisive, especially in critical moments. Her remarkable success in deciding sets further strengthens her position as a formidable contender.
Considering these factors, Mikulskyte appears better positioned to leverage her return game advantage and composure under pressure for a potential victory. Based on current form and performance trends, Mikulskyte is favored to win this closely contested match.
Koevermans vs Mikulskyte Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Anouk Koevermans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Anouk Koevermans
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Anouk Koevermans
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
47
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Federica Urgesi
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
37 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Anouk Koevermans
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
65%
(
88 of
135)
1st Serve %
71%
(
92 of
130)
4
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
11
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
52 of
92)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
48%
(
65 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
63 of
130)
133
Total Points Won
132
|
6-7(6) 7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandra Eala
Player
Anouk Koevermans
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
49%
(
30 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Anouk Koevermans
75%
(
98 of
131)
1st Serve %
72%
(
96 of
134)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
62 of
96)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
54 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
57 of
134)
134
Total Points Won
131
|
7-6(4) 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Julieta Estable
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Justina Mikulskyte Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Julie Belgraver
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Ipek Oz
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
43
Total Points Won
36
|
7-6(3) ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mei Yamaguchi
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
29 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Anouk Koevermans
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
.jpg)
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
47%
(
16 of
34)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
41%
(
16 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
46
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Maklakova
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
55 of
74)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
3-6 6-3 8-2 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (155/101) | Win/Loss | 58% (263/187) |
| 59% (343/241) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (582/454) |
| 54% (2912/2504) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4940/4388) |
| 61% (36/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (107/66) |
| 61% (98/62) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (112/72) |
| 62% (21/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49% (44/46) |
| 0% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 359 | Aces Total | 627 |
| 0.53 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 1401 | Total Double Faults | 1442 |
| 1:34:22 | Average Match Time | 1:29:38 |
| 403.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 441.1 |
| 61% (9295/15130) | 1st Serve % | 62% (16336/26217) |
| 62% (5738/9295) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (9759/16336) |
| 40% (2321/5835) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (4362/9881) |
| 51% (1088/2139) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1790/3591) |
| 49% (7477/15254) | Return Points Win % | 48% (12740/26562) |
| 33% (1/2) | Slam W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 33% (1/2) | Cups W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 63% (97/56) | Challenger W/L | 56% (176/138) |
| 60% (56/38) | Futures W/L | 66% (82/42) |
| 60% (154/255) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (257/442) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 54% (31/57) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (27/59) |
| 53% (39/73) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (79/138) |
| 87% (157/136) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (242/214) |
| 13% (157/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (242/27) |
| 19% (99/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (208/48) |
Koevermans vs. Mikulskyte Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
