J. Ponchet
To Win
A. Kulikova
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W L W L LForm
W W L L W W W L L LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Koevermans winning 2 and Ponchet winning 0. The last match between Koevermans and Ponchet was at the Wimbledon - London, 24-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Anouk Koevermans getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Anouk Koevermans | 1 |
Jessika Ponchet | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wimbledon - London(24-06-2025)
Koevermans | Stats | Ponchet |
---|---|---|
44% (12-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (17-17) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
198 | Ranking | 146 |
178 | Highest Rank | 104 |
21 | Age | 28 |
- | Plays | R |
2 | Titles | 10 |
60% (157-104) | Career Total W/L | 58% (378-277) |
$84,500 | Career Prize Money | $532,154 |
1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
- / First
Nordea Open - Bastad atp
15 Jul 2025 / First
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
16 Jul 2025 / Second
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Jessika Ponchet
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 8 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
1:29:0 | Average Match Time | 1:29:0 |
65% (43/66) | 1st Serve % | 55% (37/67) |
72% (31/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (23/37) |
43% (10/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (14/30) |
40% (4/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (2/7) |
45% (30/67) | Return Points Win % | 38% (25/66) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
As we analyze the head-to-head statistics and recent performance trends, it's evident that both Ponchet and Koevermans have areas of strength and weakness. Ponchet showcases a solid second serve game and demonstrates better resistance under pressure.
Conversely, Koevermans has a more superior overall match win rate over the past year, coupled with a stronger record in deciding sets. Her ability to convert breakpoints more effectively also contributes to her competitive edge.
While Ponchet might benefit slightly from her second serve and opposition quality faced, Koevermans brings experience and stronger recent form to the table.
Considering these factors, Koevermans is marginally favored to win the upcoming match given her overall performance consistency and better recent competition level.
Koevermans vs Ponchet Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Anouk Koevermans
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Anouk Koevermans
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Shuo Feng
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
20 of
34)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
23%
(
3 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Kaja Juvan
Player
Anouk Koevermans
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Jessika Ponchet
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Maria Sakkari
Player
Anouk Koevermans
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Julia Grabher
Player
Anouk Koevermans
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
47
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Federica Urgesi
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
37 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Jessika Ponchet
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Rebecca Marino
Player
Jessika Ponchet
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Jessika Ponchet
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
5
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Mingge Xu
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Heather Watson
61%
(
66 of
108)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
107)
18
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
35 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
107)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Vitalia Diatchenko
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
78%
(
36 of
46)
11
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Lola Radivojevic
Player
Jessika Ponchet
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
40%
(
19 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Lois Boisson
Player
Jessika Ponchet
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
60% (157/104) | Win/Loss | 58% (378/277) |
58% (347/247) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (863/636) |
54% (2950/2550) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7390/6478) |
61% (36/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (136/88) |
61% (99/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (104/82) |
62% (21/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (124/90) |
20% (1/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 45% (14/17) |
0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
360 | Aces Total | 2499 |
0.53 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
1426 | Total Double Faults | 1268 |
1:34:8 | Average Match Time | 1:16:54 |
402.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 482.61 |
61% (9448/15380) | 1st Serve % | 55% (20301/36879) |
62% (5842/9448) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (14274/20301) |
40% (2351/5932) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (7536/16577) |
51% (1102/2171) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1913/4137) |
49% (7601/15536) | Return Points Win % | 44% (15765/36227) |
40% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 34% (14/27) |
0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) |
33% (1/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 44% (24/31) |
63% (98/58) | Challenger W/L | 60% (250/168) |
60% (56/38) | Futures W/L | 64% (89/49) |
60% (156/260) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (373/646) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
54% (31/57) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (88/166) |
53% (39/73) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (85/194) |
87% (159/138) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (404/341) |
13% (159/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (404/63) |
19% (102/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (251/38) |