Anouk Koevermans vs Federica Urgesi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W L W L L
Form
L W L W L W L W L LHead-2-Head: Koevermans 1 - 0 Urgesi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Koevermans winning 2 and Urgesi winning 0. The last match between Koevermans and Urgesi was at the W75 Brescia, 28-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Anouk Koevermans getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anouk Koevermans | 1 |
| Federica Urgesi | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W75 Brescia(28-05-2025)
Anouk Koevermans
Federica Urgesi
7
6
6
4
| Koevermans | Stats | Urgesi |
|---|---|---|
| 44% (12-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 43% (13-17) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 198 | Ranking | 429 |
| 178 | Highest Rank | 429 |
| 21 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 60% (157-104) | Career Total W/L | 48% (64-70) |
| $84,500 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Hanfmann VS Ramos-Vinolas PREDICTION Clay
Generali Open - Kitzbuhel atp
19 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Monteiro VS Oberleitner PREDICTION Clay
Generali Open - Kitzbuhel atp
19 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Koevermans VS Urgesi H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-4 |
Stats 
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Federica Urgesi
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
37 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
Koevermans VS Urgesi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:7:32 | Average Match Time | 2:7:32 |
| 67% (52/78) | 1st Serve % | 61% (52/85) |
| 54% (28/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (31/52) |
| 50% (13/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (12/33) |
| 50% (6/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 56% (5/9) |
| 49% (42/85) | Return Points Win % | 47% (37/78) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Koevermans vs Urgesi Match Preview :
- When examining recent second serve performance, Urgesi has a slight edge with a 41.61% success rate compared to Koevermans' 40%.
- Urgesi demonstrates superior proficiency in winning points on their opponent's second serve, achieving 52.16%, whereas Koevermans stands at 48.57%.
- Is there a difference in first serve return abilities? It's minimal, with Urgesi at 31.53% and Koevermans at a slightly higher 31.66%.
- Under pressure, Koevermans appears slightly more resilient, saving 53.49% of breakpoints, surpassing Urgesi's 51.93%.
- In terms of overall performance over the past year, Koevermans leads with a 62.32% win rate compared to Urgesi's 55%.
- Both players have their highest win percentages on indoor hard courts, with Urgesi at 63% and Koevermans closely behind at 62%.
- Analyzing each player's experience level, Koevermans has been more successful, winning 64.62% of their matches in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, while Urgesi has won 57.41%.
- Which player has faced tougher opponents? Koevermans, with an average opponent rank of 320.65, compared to Urgesi's 417.78.
- In matches that go to a deciding set, Urgesi has a marginal advantage, winning 52% compared to Koevermans' 48%.
- Recently, Urgesi has been slightly more effective at converting breakpoints, with a success rate of 46.15% against Koevermans' 45.05%.
Editorial Prediction (May 28, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match presents an intriguing contest between two players with distinct strengths and recent performances. Urgesi shows promise in second serve performance and breakpoint conversion, slightly outpacing Koevermans in these areas.
Conversely, Koevermans exhibits greater experience and overall match win percentage. Their history of facing stronger opponents positions them as a formidable contender. Additionally, while Urgesi has an edge in deciding set encounters, Koevermans demonstrates resilience under breakpoint pressure.
Considering the data, these factors suggests that Koevermans is the likely winner for this match. Their consistent performance and ability to handle diverse challenges provide them with a small but significant overall advantage over Urgesi.
Koevermans vs Urgesi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Anouk Koevermans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Anouk Koevermans
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Anouk Koevermans
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Shuo Feng
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
20 of
34)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
23%
(
3 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Anouk Koevermans
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Jessika Ponchet
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Anouk Koevermans
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Anouk Koevermans
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
47
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Federica Urgesi
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
37 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Federica Urgesi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
Player
Federica Urgesi
45%
(
10 of
22)
1st Serve %
68%
(
17 of
25)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
50%
(
11 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
27
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Federica Urgesi
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
8
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Kristina Kroitor
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Federica Urgesi
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
16
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
46%
(
39 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Federica Urgesi
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Chiara Fornasieri
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Federica Urgesi
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
47
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (157/104) | Win/Loss | 48% (64/70) |
| 58% (347/247) | Sets Win/Loss | 48% (154/165) |
| 54% (2950/2550) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (1535/1528) |
| 61% (36/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) |
| 61% (99/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 43% (38/51) |
| 62% (21/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (23/15) |
| 20% (1/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 360 | Aces Total | 193 |
| 0.53 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1426 | Total Double Faults | 437 |
| 1:34:8 | Average Match Time | 1:40:22 |
| 402.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 444.17 |
| 61% (9448/15380) | 1st Serve % | 62% (5251/8457) |
| 62% (5842/9448) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (3118/5251) |
| 40% (2351/5932) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1411/3206) |
| 51% (1102/2171) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (503/1066) |
| 49% (7601/15536) | Return Points Win % | 46% (3903/8471) |
| 40% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 33% (1/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 63% (98/58) | Challenger W/L | 45% (45/55) |
| 60% (56/38) | Futures W/L | 61% (19/12) |
| 60% (156/260) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (63/132) |
| 54% (31/57) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (11/26) |
| 53% (39/73) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (26/53) |
| 87% (159/138) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (65/51) |
| 13% (159/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (65/14) |
| 19% (102/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (69/12) |
Koevermans vs. Urgesi Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
