Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anouck Vrancken Peeters vs Miho Kuramochi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Peeters vs Kuramochi analysis and find out who is favored!
Anouck Vrancken Peeters vs Miho Kuramochi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Peeters has won 43.59% of points on his second serve, while Kuramochi has won 43.92%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Peeters, in recent form, has won 57.39% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kuramochi has won 58.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.48% and 43.02% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Peeters has saved 54.4% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kuramochi has saved 53.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Peeters has won 49.06% of matches played (W/L 26/ 27), with Kuramochi winning 64.06% (W/L 41/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Peeters has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 33/ 26). Kuramochi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 72% (W/L 18/ 7), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Peeters has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.76% of matches (W/L 23/ 19), where as Kuramochi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 25/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Peeters winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Peeters winning 2 and Kuramochi winning 0. The last match between Peeters and Kuramochi was at the W15 Monastir, 24-03-2022, First, Hard with Anouck Vrancken Peeters getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:37:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Peeters and Kuramochi have played a deciding set 0 times, with Peeters winning 0 times and Kuramochi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Peeters winning 0, and Kuramochi 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Peeters has played against opponents with an average rank of 122.11 while Kuramochi has played against players with an average rank of 276.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Peeters has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kuramochi has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Peeters has converted 47.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kuramochi has converted 44.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Peeters 1 - 0 Kuramochi
852
Rank
663
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
408
Rank
388
High
25
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
57% (72-55)
Career Total W/L
62% (94-57)
53% (9-8)
YTD W/L
59% (10-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Anouck Vrancken Peeters | Miho Kuramochi |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:0 | 1:37:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (43/61) | 64% (36/56) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 56% (24/43) | 56% (20/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 39% (7/18) | 10% (2/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 78% (7/9) | 63% (5/8) |
| Return Points W% | 61% (34/56) | 49% (30/61) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Miho Kuramochi
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
49%
(
30 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anouck Vrancken Peeters | Miho Kuramochi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (9/8) | 59% (10/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (19/18) | 57% (24/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (172/150) | 54% (193/164) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 59% (10/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 18 | 6 |
| DFs per game | 0.49 | 0.36 |
| DFs Total | 77 | 62 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:42 | 1:57:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 147.82 | 305.76 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (633/1013) | 74% (865/1176) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (392/633) | 59% (511/865) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (164/380) | 41% (128/311) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (58/135) | 44% (85/194) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (431/918) | 49% (626/1283) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 59% (10/7) |
| Futures W/L | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (8/16) | 59% (10/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (3/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 36% (11/4) |
Anouck Vrancken Peeters Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
54%
(
42 of
78)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Neilson Gatenby
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
11
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
52%
(
23 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
47 of
79)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Maya Drozd
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
46%
(
32 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Boyoung Jeong
60%
(
59 of
99)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
1
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
7
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Merna Refaat
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
4-6 6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Samsonova
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
94)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Varvara Bernovich
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Miho Kuramochi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Miho Kuramochi
61%
(
71 of
117)
1st Serve %
71%
(
83 of
117)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
11
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
46 of
83)
39%
(
18 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
58 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
62 of
117)
121
Total Points Won
113
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Saki Imamura
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
109)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
109)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sijia Wei
Player
Miho Kuramochi
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
58 of
85)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Erika Sema
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
77%
(
30 of
39)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rina Saigo
Player
Miho Kuramochi
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Mayuka Aikawa
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
76%
(
38 of
50)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Miho Kuramochi
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Melisa Ercan
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Punnin Kovapitukted
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve %
72%
(
58 of
81)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Peeters Vs Kuramochi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
