Anouck Vrancken Peeters vs Lian Tran Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W L L
Form
W W L L W W L W W LHead-To-Head: Peeters 2 - 1 Tran
They have played 7 sets in total, with Peeters winning 4 and Tran winning 3. The last match between Peeters and Tran was at the W35 Esch/Alzette, 23-01-2025, Second, I.hard with Anouck Vrancken Peeters getting the victory 2-6 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anouck Vrancken Peeters | 2 |
| Lian Tran | 1 |
W35 Esch/Alzette(23-01-2025)
2
6
6
2
6
4
| Peeters | Stats | Tran |
|---|---|---|
| 85% (23-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 57% (13-10) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 539 | Ranking | 360 |
| 539 | Highest Rank | 351 |
| 22 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 1 |
| 60% (108-72) | Career Total W/L | 55% (165-137) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 3 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS O'Connell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rinderknech VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Lian Tran
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
91
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
6
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
49%
(
44 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(1) |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Lian Tran
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 35 | Games Won | 34 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
| 1:57:50 | Average Match Time | 1:57:50 |
| 60% (138/230) | 1st Serve % | 65% (155/237) |
| 57% (79/138) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (90/155) |
| 54% (50/92) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (39/82) |
| 41% (13/32) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (13/26) |
| 46% (108/237) | Return Points Win % | 44% (101/230) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Anouck Vrancken Peeters Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ashley Lahey
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
91)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
14
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
41 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Bibiane Schoofs
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Esther Lopez Alcaraz
63%
(
5 of
8)
1st Serve %
78%
(
7 of
9)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
40%
(
2 of
5)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
3 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
12
Total Points Won
5
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Anna Siskova
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Julita Saner
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Victoria Allen
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
74%
(
70 of
95)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Ann Akasha Ceuca
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Jeong Moon
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Anastasia Kulikova
76%
(
68 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lian Tran Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yue Yuan
Player
Lian Tran
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Sofia Kryvoruchko
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Analu Freitas
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Lian Tran
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Carson Branstine
74%
(
72 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
107)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
44 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Teresa Poppe
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve %
74%
(
31 of
42)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuki Naito
Player
Lian Tran
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
76%
(
38 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
10 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
22 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ksenia Zaytseva
Player
Lian Tran
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
48%
(
32 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Anna Ureke
76%
(
76 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
48%
(
48 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
97)
104
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Micol Salvadori
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
25%
(
6 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
32 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (108/72) | Win/Loss | 55% (165/137) |
| 58% (241/174) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (369/322) |
| 54% (2043/1719) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3218/2975) |
| 61% (44/28) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (67/62) |
| 52% (41/38) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (71/58) |
| 79% (23/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (27/17) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 109 | Aces Total | 95 |
| 0.45 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 827 | Total Double Faults | 752 |
| 1:35:16 | Average Match Time | 1:25:56 |
| 382.81 | Average Opponent Rank | 469.84 |
| 63% (6597/10520) | 1st Serve % | 71% (12173/17201) |
| 59% (3876/6597) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (6681/12173) |
| 43% (1700/3923) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (2141/5026) |
| 53% (742/1411) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1255/2472) |
| 49% (5022/10206) | Return Points Win % | 50% (8632/17435) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (28/26) | Challenger W/L | 57% (73/54) |
| 63% (80/46) | Futures W/L | 53% (92/83) |
| 60% (107/178) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (158/288) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 42% (11/26) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (24/48) |
| 54% (31/57) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (54/97) |
| 88% (97/85) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (157/133) |
| 12% (97/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (157/22) |
| 27% (83/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (145/32) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
