Annick Melgers vs Sara Cakarevic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Melgers vs Cakarevic analysis and find out who is favored!
Annick Melgers vs Sara Cakarevic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Melgers has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Cakarevic has won 44.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Melgers, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cakarevic has won 56.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 40.38% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Melgers has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cakarevic has saved 58.94% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Melgers has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Cakarevic winning 60.47% (W/L 26/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Melgers has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 8/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Cakarevic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 41/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 22/ 31).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Melgers winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Melgers winning 0 and Cakarevic winning 2. The last match between Melgers and Cakarevic was at the W15 Alkmaar, 25-08-2020, First, Clay with Sara Cakarevic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Melgers and Cakarevic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Melgers winning 0 times and Cakarevic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Melgers winning 0, and Cakarevic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Melgers has played against opponents with an average rank of while Cakarevic has played against players with an average rank of 231.65.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Melgers has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cakarevic has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Melgers has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cakarevic has converted 43.07% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Melgers 0 - 1 Cakarevic
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
431
Rank
304
High
27
Age
Plays
4
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
Form
44% (54-70)
Career Total W/L
57% (272-204)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
60% (6-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Annick Melgers | Sara Cakarevic |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 6 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:30:0 | 1:30:0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (35/60) | 56% (34/61) |
1st Serve Win% | 43% (15/35) | 62% (21/34) |
2nd Serve Win% | 36% (9/25) | 44% (12/27) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 64% (7/11) |
Return Points W% | 46% (28/61) | 60% (36/60) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-4 |
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Annick Melgers
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Annick Melgers | Sara Cakarevic |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (14/10) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (122/106) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.23 |
Aces Total | 0 | 25 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.14 |
DFs Total | 0 | 15 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 2:15:6 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 100.1 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 65% (527/817) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (317/527) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (132/290) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 44% (50/113) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (359/756) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/9) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 71% (7/5) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (7/2) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
Annick Melgers Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Tereza Dejnozkova
Player
Annick Melgers
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chiraz Bechri
Player
Annick Melgers
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
51%
(
26 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Annick Melgers
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Annick Melgers
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Annick Melgers
Player
Bente Spee
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alba Rey Garcia
Player
Annick Melgers
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
14 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
49
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(1) ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Annick Melgers
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Player
Annick Melgers
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
48%
(
46 of
96)
-
Aces
-
11
Double Faults
6
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(6) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Sara Cakarevic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Camilla Gennaro
Player
Sara Cakarevic
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(11) 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Georgia Pedone
71%
(
80 of
113)
1st Serve %
75%
(
79 of
105)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
47%
(
53 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
105)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Sara Cakarevic
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Amina Anshba
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
80%
(
57 of
71)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Gabriela Ce
Player
Sara Cakarevic
79%
(
61 of
77)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Camilla Zanolini
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Ylena In-Albon
Player
Sara Cakarevic
79%
(
89 of
113)
1st Serve %
71%
(
89 of
126)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
45%
(
40 of
89)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
41%
(
11 of
27)
Break Points Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
54%
(
61 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
69 of
126)
121
Total Points Won
118
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Ana Sofia Sanchez
62%
(
85 of
137)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
105)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
42%
(
22 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
38%
(
8 of
21)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
46%
(
63 of
137)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
105)
127
Total Points Won
115
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Camila Romero
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Weronika Baszak
49%
(
18 of
37)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more