Annelin Bakker vs Viktoria Hruncakova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W L W W W L
Form
W L L W W L W W W LHead-To-Head: Bakker 1 - 0 Hruncakova
They have played 2 sets in total, with Bakker winning 2 and Hruncakova winning 0. The last match between Bakker and Hruncakova was at the W35 Bastad, 14-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Annelin Bakker getting the victory 7-6(1) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Annelin Bakker | 1 |
| Viktoria Hruncakova | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Bastad(14-05-2025)
Annelin Bakker
Viktoria Hruncakova
7
6
6
3
| Bakker | Stats | Hruncakova |
|---|---|---|
| 67% (6-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (26-14) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 881 | Ranking | 220 |
| 881 | Highest Rank | 43 |
| 20 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 17 |
| 54% (29-25) | Career Total W/L | 63% (419-251) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $1,078,936 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Bublik PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rublev VS Etcheverry PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bakker VS Hruncakova H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 6-3 |
Stats 
Annelin Bakker
Player
Viktoria Hruncakova
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
38%
(
24 of
63)
0
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
87
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Bakker VS Hruncakova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:48:52 | Average Match Time | 1:48:52 |
| 64% (60/94) | 1st Serve % | 38% (24/63) |
| 63% (38/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (18/24) |
| 44% (15/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 28% (11/39) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (4/12) |
| 54% (34/63) | Return Points Win % | 44% (41/94) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bakker vs Hruncakova Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Hruncakova appears stronger, having recently won 40.43% of her second serve points compared to Bakker's 28.74%. Could this be a deciding factor?
- Return Game Effectiveness: Bakker leads with 54.79% of opponent's second serve points won, while Hruncakova trails at 47.62%. On first serve returns, Bakker stands at 34.85%, outpacing Hruncakova's 25.56%.
- Handling Pressure: Hruncakova excels in pressure situations, saving 53.28% of breakpoints, whereas Bakker saves 38.98%.
- Overall Performance: In the past year, Hruncakova has a superior win rate of 56.41% versus Bakker's 50%.
- Preferred Surface: Both players favor hard courts but Hruncakova holds a slight edge with a 65% career win rate over Bakker's 63%.
- Event Level Experience: Hruncakova competes mainly in higher-tier events (Challengers/ITF), winning 60.87%, surpassing Bakker's 44.44% at lower-tier events.
- Opponent Strength: Hruncakova competes against better-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 369.95 compared to Bakker's 396.06.
- Deciding Sets: Hruncakova's margin is narrow but she wins 52% of deciding sets, slightly above Bakker's 50%.
- Breakpoint Conversion: Bakker excels in converting breakpoints at 48.65%, outperforming Hruncakova's 34.62%.
Editorial Prediction (May 14, 2025, UTC):
As we assess their recent performances, Hruncakova holds a clear advantage in second serve consistency and breakpoint defense, crucial elements in determining the match's outcome. Her experience and success against higher-ranked opponents further bolster her position as a formidable contender.
However, Bakker's effectiveness in returning serves and a higher breakpoint conversion rate could keep her competitive. It will be essential for Bakker to capitalize on these strengths to place pressure on Hruncakova.
Considering both players' performances and scenarios, Hruncakova's edge in key statistical areas makes her the likely winner of this upcoming match.
Bakker vs Hruncakova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Annelin Bakker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Yasmine Kabbaj
Player
Annelin Bakker
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Annelin Bakker
Player
Viktoria Hruncakova
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
38%
(
24 of
63)
0
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
87
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Annelin Bakker
Player
Britt Du Pree
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
9
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
51%
(
33 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Annelin Bakker
Player
Mathilda Giers
52%
(
15 of
29)
1st Serve %
42%
(
14 of
33)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
50
Total Points Won
12
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amelie Van Impe
Player
Annelin Bakker
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
11
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
52%
(
34 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Annelin Bakker
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Annelin Bakker
Player
Sarafina Olivia Hansen
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Annelin Bakker
Player
Grace Bernstein
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
14%
(
1 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
view more
Viktoria Hruncakova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Matilde Jorge
Player
Viktoria Hruncakova
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
3
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
6
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Iveta Dapkute
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Olga Helmi
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
46
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Alba Rey Garcia
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleksandra Oliynykova
Player
Viktoria Hruncakova
82%
(
68 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
10 of
39)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
48%
(
40 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
53 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Maria Jose Portillo Ramirez
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Ziva Falkner
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
74%
(
34 of
46)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
7 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
48
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Annelin Bakker
Player
Viktoria Hruncakova
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
38%
(
24 of
63)
0
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
87
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (29/25) | Win/Loss | 63% (419/251) |
| 54% (68/59) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (909/611) |
| 51% (603/580) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7572/6562) |
| 63% (12/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 65% (200/109) |
| 50% (17/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (93/63) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (109/61) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 49% (17/18) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.42 |
| 59 | Aces Total | 2875 |
| 0.54 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 |
| 313 | Total Double Faults | 2437 |
| 1:30:4 | Average Match Time | 1:23:35 |
| 417 | Average Opponent Rank | 425.63 |
| 65% (2254/3451) | 1st Serve % | 57% (22936/40300) |
| 59% (1333/2254) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (15938/22936) |
| 38% (458/1197) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (7933/17364) |
| 54% (227/422) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (2172/4764) |
| 49% (1604/3283) | Return Points Win % | 44% (18104/41593) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 48% (31/33) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 52% (13/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 74% (14/5) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 52% (73/67) |
| 59% (10/7) | Challenger W/L | 65% (205/109) |
| 53% (19/17) | Futures W/L | 77% (83/25) |
| 54% (28/52) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (415/664) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 36% (4/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (91/163) |
| 47% (9/19) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (109/183) |
| 80% (30/24) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (411/367) |
| 20% (30/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (411/44) |
| 21% (24/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (259/51) |
Bakker vs. Hruncakova Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
