Matchstat.com expert prediction for the Lammas Mishieva H2H. Here is our in-depth stats analysis and accurate prediction of the Lammas Mishieva head to head.
Full Stats Used To Calculate Our Lammas Vs Mishieva Prediction Are Further Down This Page. Here Is A Brief Snapshot

The best career year for Lammas was 2021 when she won 25% of matches played on all surfaces (1/3). Mishieva was in the best form in 2023 when she had victories of 26% of his matches (6/17). In their last event played, Mishieva made the Q2 round at W15 Sharm ElSheikh, whereas Lammas played W15 Sharm ElSheikh and made the Q2 round.


N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
Form
14% (2-12)
Career Total W/L
19% (11-47)
0% (0-3)
YTD W/L
26% (6-17)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

stats | Annabelle Lammas | Nikol Mishieva |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 9 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Form Is Very Important In Predicting An Upcoming H2H. Recent Matches With Stats…
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Annabelle Lammas | Nikol Mishieva |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/3) | 26% (6/17) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/6) | 27% (13/35) |
Games Win/Loss | 29% (15/37) | 38% (153/250) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 25% (4/12) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.02 |
Aces Total | 0 | 4 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.28 |
DFs Total | 0 | 54 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 34.35 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 53% (230/436) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (109/230) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (69/206) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 33% (15/45) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (177/440) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/3) | 26% (6/17) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/3) | 26% (6/23) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (6/5) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (6/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 6% (17/1) |
Annabelle Lammas Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Annabelle Lammas
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Nikol Mishieva Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yu Shan
Player
Nikol Mishieva
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
46%
(
43 of
93)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
17
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Zuzanna Bednarz
Player
Nikol Mishieva
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Diana De Simone
Player
Nikol Mishieva
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
41%
(
12 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
43
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Anastasia Komkina
Player
Nikol Mishieva
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve %
52%
(
15 of
29)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
14 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
39
Total Points Won
27
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Alisa Kummel
Player
Nikol Mishieva
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 6-1 10-5 | H2H |
view more
Lammas Vs Mishieva Prediction H2H Images To Share

