Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Sofia Shapatava Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W L L W W L
Form
W W L W L W L L L LHead-To-Head: Friedsam 2 - 1 Shapatava
They have played 7 sets in total, with Friedsam winning 5 and Shapatava winning 2. The last match between Friedsam and Shapatava was at the W50 Troisdorf, 05-06-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | 2 |
| Sofia Shapatava | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W50 Troisdorf(05-06-2025)
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Sofia Shapatava
6
2
6
0
| Friedsam | Stats | Shapatava |
|---|---|---|
| 73% (30-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (25-18) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 225 | Ranking | 426 |
| 45 | Highest Rank | 186 |
| 31 | Age | 36 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 15 | Titles | 3 |
| 60% (391-257) | Career Total W/L | 50% (528-525) |
| $1,078,782 | Career Prize Money | $47,406 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Anisimova VS Swiatek PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
12 Jul 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Sofia Shapatava
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
8 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Sofia Shapatava
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
8
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 7-6(9) | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 39 | Games Won | 25 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 0:44:1 | Average Match Time | 0:44:1 |
| 62% (64/103) | 1st Serve % | 65% (76/117) |
| 80% (51/64) | 1st Serve Win % | 45% (34/76) |
| 51% (20/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (21/41) |
| 43% (9/21) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 53% (62/117) | Return Points Win % | 31% (32/103) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Friedsam vs Shapatava Match Preview :
- In the past six months, Friedsam has demonstrated a slightly superior second serve performance, winning 39.86% of points compared to Shapatava's 37.87%. Does this give her a serving edge? It could be a minor advantage.
- When examining the return game, Friedsam has a slight advantage, capturing 49.1% of opponents' second serve points compared to Shapatava's 48.74%. However, Shapatava edges slightly ahead in first serve returns with 31.15% versus Friedsam's 30.64%. Which aspect might prove crucial? It’s difficult to predict, but both are closely matched.
- Under pressure, Friedsam is notably more resilient, saving 54.21% of breakpoints, while Shapatava manages 42.57%. Will this composure under pressure be decisive? It might be beneficial, especially in critical moments.
- Over the last year, Friedsam has enjoyed greater match success, winning 72.09% of her matches, compared to Shapatava's 60%. Could recent form play a significant role? Friedsam's superior win percentage suggests it might.
- The surface performance shows Friedsam excelling on Indoor hard courts with a 67% win record, while Shapatava performs best on Grass, with a 73% win rate. On which surface is the match being played? This information is pivotal.
- When considering experience against high-caliber opponents, Friedsam has faced higher-ranked competition, with an average opponent rank of 270.56, contrasting with Shapatava's 420.19. Does this experience provide an edge? It might if quality of opponents plays a decisive factor.
- The head-to-head record is evenly split with one win each, but Friedsam has a slight set advantage, 3-2. Could this past record influence the outcome? Perhaps, if history repeats itself.
- In deciding sets, Friedsam showcases a strong 69% win rate over the past year versus Shapatava's 57%. How critical is this if the match is tightly contested? It could be significant in a close match scenario.
- Break point conversion suggests Shapatava has a slight edge, converting 36.33% compared to Friedsam's 35.16%. Will this play a role in crucial points? It is a key factor in turning matches.
Editorial Prediction (June 5, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Friedsam and Shapatava promises to be a closely fought encounter. While Friedsam has demonstrated stronger recent form and experience against higher-ranked opponents, both players have areas of strength that could tip the match in their favor.
Friedsam's resilience under pressure and her slightly better performance on Indoor hard courts might provide her with a critical edge, especially crucial if the match becomes tense.
Despite Shapatava's strengths, including her excellent grass court performance and break point conversion, the facts lean slightly toward Friedsam as the likely favorite. Therefore, based on the unfolding stats and their historical data, Friedsam is expected to prevail in this matchup.
Friedsam vs Shapatava Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Anna-Lena Friedsam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Yuliya Hatouka
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Noelia Bouzo Zanotti
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alexis Blokhina
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
76%
(
78 of
103)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
103)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
72%
(
64 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
60%
(
59 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
107)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
41 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Sofia Shapatava
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
8 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Sofia Shapatava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Yasmine Kabbaj
Player
Sofia Shapatava
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vittoria Paganetti
Player
Sofia Shapatava
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
68%
(
58 of
85)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
42 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Sofia Shapatava
45%
(
45 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
4
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
0
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
39%
(
21 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Sofia Shapatava
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
8 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Shapatava
Player
Nina Radovanovic
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Radovanovic
Player
Sofia Shapatava
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Shapatava
Player
Milana Maslenkova
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (391/257) | Win/Loss | 50% (528/525) |
| 58% (878/628) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (1209/1210) |
| 54% (7495/6483) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (11065/11075) |
| 56% (103/80) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (150/155) |
| 60% (137/92) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (282/265) |
| 67% (135/66) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (88/101) |
| 46% (16/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 67% (8/4) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1525 | Aces Total | 798 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1629 | Total Double Faults | 1359 |
| 1:10:42 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 449.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 565.95 |
| 65% (21697/33383) | 1st Serve % | 62% (23815/38655) |
| 65% (14168/21697) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (14243/23815) |
| 46% (5388/11684) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (6431/14838) |
| 45% (1651/3641) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (2297/4833) |
| 43% (14079/33001) | Return Points Win % | 46% (17502/38342) |
| 38% (21/35) | Slam W/L | 50% (5/5) |
| 33% (10/20) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 20% (3/12) |
| 53% (101/90) | Main Tour W/L | 37% (22/37) |
| 69% (204/93) | Challenger W/L | 49% (394/407) |
| 77% (53/16) | Futures W/L | 62% (104/64) |
| 60% (382/634) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (522/1034) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 43% (3/7) |
| 51% (87/169) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (117/235) |
| 54% (119/220) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (166/318) |
| 86% (387/331) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (521/437) |
| 14% (387/55) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (521/83) |
| 23% (261/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (532/91) |
Friedsam vs. Shapatava Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
