Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Shelby Rogers Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Friedsam vs Rogers analysis and find out who is favored!
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Shelby Rogers Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Friedsam has won 46.66% of points on his second serve, while Rogers has won 50%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Friedsam, in recent form, has won 53.09% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rogers has won 53.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.43% and 32.46% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Friedsam has saved 61.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rogers has saved 48.39% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Friedsam has won 44.68% of matches played (W/L 21/ 26), with Rogers winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Friedsam has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 109/ 54), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 16/ 18). Rogers has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 172/ 129), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 19/ 27).
- Player level: In the last year, Friedsam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 12/ 9), where as Rogers has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 40% of matches (W/L 2/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Friedsam winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Friedsam winning 2 and Rogers winning 1. The last match between Friedsam and Rogers was at the Upper Austria Ladies Linz - Linz, 07-10-2019, Q3, I.hard with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Friedsam and Rogers have played a deciding set 1 times, with Friedsam winning 1 times and Rogers 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Friedsam winning 0, and Rogers 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Friedsam has played against opponents with an average rank of 184.68 while Rogers has played against players with an average rank of 96.25.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Friedsam has won 31% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rogers has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Friedsam has converted 42.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rogers has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Friedsam 1 - 0 Rogers
189
Rank
45
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
350
Rank
30
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
60% (355-241)
Career Total W/L
54% (300-256)
30% (3-7)
YTD W/L
33% (2-4)
$1,003,807
Career Prize Money
$3,727,427
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Shelby Rogers |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:29 | 1:55:29 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (51/70) | 63% (64/102) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (38/51) | 52% (33/64) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (8/19) | 53% (20/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (6/14) | 57% (4/7) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (49/102) | 34% (24/70) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Shelby Rogers
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
7
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
95
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Shelby Rogers |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 30% (3/7) | 33% (2/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 37% (10/17) | 33% (4/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (113/145) | 48% (47/51) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.34 |
| Aces Total | 36 | 16 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 48 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:5:24 | 1:15:36 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 160.6 | 98 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (585/864) | 56% (158/284) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (354/585) | 64% (101/158) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (122/279) | 50% (63/126) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (32/88) | 50% (16/32) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (345/855) | 41% (129/317) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (2/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 30% (3/10) | 33% (2/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (4/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (4/4) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (6/3) | 0% (4/0) |
Anna-Lena Friedsam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
73 of
113)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
59 of
113)
103
Total Points Won
79
|
5-7 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Talia Gibson
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
10
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Veronika Erjavec
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
108)
7
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
49 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Greetje Minnen
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
103)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
103)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
49%
(
49 of
101)
1st Serve %
72%
(
70 of
97)
5
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
6
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
50%
(
26 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Shelby Rogers Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Shelby Rogers
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shelby Rogers
Player
Claire Liu
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Player
Shelby Rogers
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Shelby Rogers
50%
(
17 of
34)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
43
Total Points Won
31
|
7-5 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shelby Rogers
Player
Arianne Hartono
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Shelby Rogers
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Shelby Rogers
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
81)
12
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
93%
(
41 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
17 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
62
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Shelby Rogers
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
39 of
75)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Martic
Player
Shelby Rogers
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Shelby Rogers
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Friedsam Vs Rogers Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Anna-Lena Friedsam
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
