Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Sara Errani Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W W W L L
Form
L L L W L L L L W LH2H: Friedsam 2 - 0 Errani
They have played 5 sets in total, with Friedsam winning 4 and Errani winning 1. The last match between Friedsam and Errani was at the French Open - Paris, 22-05-2025, Round: Q2 round, Surface: Clay, with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory 1-6 6-0 7-6(7).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | 2 |
| Sara Errani | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(22-05-2025)
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Sara Errani
1
6
6
0
7
6
| Friedsam | Stats | Errani |
|---|---|---|
| 74% (28-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 25% (3-9) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 232 | Ranking | 243 |
| 45 | Highest Rank | 5 |
| 31 | Age | 38 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 15 | Titles | 16 |
| 60% (389-256) | Career Total W/L | 57% (650-490) |
| $1,078,782 | Career Prize Money | $7,709,160 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alcaraz VS Clar PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fearnley VS Moutet PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 6-0 7-6(7) |
Stats 
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Sara Errani
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
88%
(
73 of
83)
4
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
3
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Sara Errani
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
78%
(
53 of
68)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
40 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 26 | Games Won | 18 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 11 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:4:23 | Average Match Time | 2:4:23 |
| 70% (128/184) | 1st Serve % | 83% (126/151) |
| 62% (79/128) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (64/126) |
| 39% (22/56) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (12/25) |
| 50% (11/22) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (8/28) |
| 50% (75/151) | Return Points Win % | 45% (83/184) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Friedsam vs Errani Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Friedsam recently won 39.01% of points on her second serve compared to Errani's 40.47%. Does this slight advantage indicate a better chance for Errani? It leans her way slightly.
- Return Game Strength: Friedsam has secured 48.87% of opponents' second serve points, slightly behind Errani who won 53.28%. On first serve returns, Friedsam's win rate is 30.59% against Errani's 34.47%. Errani shows superiority in return games.
- Handling Pressure: Friedsam saved 53.29% of breakpoints in recent play, while Errani saved 51.16%. This suggests Friedsam might have a slight edge in critical moments.
- Overall Performance: Friedsam boasts a win rate of 72.5% over the last year, significantly higher than Errani's 41.94%. Does this suggest a preference for Friedsam as the match winner?
- Surface Strength: Friedsam's best surface is indoor hard courts with 67% win rate, while Errani favors clay with a 63% win rate. Neither excels on grass, with Friedsam at 47% and Errani at 41%.
- Match Level: Friedsam mainly competes in Challenger/ITF events, winning 73.53%. Errani has played more at the Grand Slam level, having a win rate of 60%. Their match experiences differ.
- Head-to-Head Rounds: Friedsam has a perfect record against Errani with one win. The last match concluded with a straight-set win for Friedsam. Errani has yet to beat her.
- Opponent Quality: Over the past year, Friedsam's average opponent ranking was 269.02, whereas Errani faced players with an average rank of 218.84. Errani has encountered tougher competition.
- Deciding Set Prospects: Friedsam has won 64% of deciding sets recently, slightly less than Errani's 67% efficiency. Does Errani have the upper hand if the match extends?
- Break Point Conversion: Friedsam converted breakpoints at 34.31%, significantly lower than Errani's 53.85%. This could be pivotal in clutch points during the match.
Editorial Prediction (May 22, 2025, UTC):
The statistical overview paints an intriguing picture of this tennis confrontation. Friedsam's head-to-head successes and overall superior win-loss record suggest a capacity to dominate opponents, enhanced by her ability to perform well under pressure.
Errani, however, showcases a formidable return game and successes in break point conversion, indicating a tactical strength that could challenge Friedsam. Her experience facing higher-ranked opponents might also prove advantageous.
While Friedsam's current trajectory and past victory favor her, Errani's competitive edge in returns and break points could alter the course if seized effectively.
Given the balance between current form and head-to-head history, Friedsam appears the likely winner, bolstered by her consistent performance and previous success against Errani.
Friedsam vs Errani Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Anna-Lena Friedsam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alexis Blokhina
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
76%
(
78 of
103)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
103)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
72%
(
64 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
60%
(
59 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
107)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
41 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Sofia Shapatava
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
8 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Sara Errani
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
88%
(
73 of
83)
4
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
3
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 6-0 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Sara Errani Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Sara Errani
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
88%
(
73 of
83)
4
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
3
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 6-0 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Jule Niemeier
81%
(
70 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
11
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
0-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Sara Errani
46%
(
22 of
48)
1st Serve %
82%
(
53 of
65)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Sara Errani
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Sara Errani
64%
(
76 of
119)
1st Serve %
83%
(
99 of
120)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
57 of
99)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
48 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
50 of
120)
121
Total Points Won
118
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Sara Errani
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
1
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Sara Errani
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
79%
(
72 of
91)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (389/256) | Win/Loss | 57% (650/490) |
| 58% (874/626) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (1444/1161) |
| 54% (7466/6457) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (12376/11391) |
| 56% (101/79) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (239/201) |
| 60% (137/92) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (347/208) |
| 67% (135/66) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (40/46) |
| 46% (16/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 41% (24/35) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 1511 | Aces Total | 202 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1620 | Total Double Faults | 2020 |
| 1:10:40 | Average Match Time | 1:9:35 |
| 448.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 433.98 |
| 65% (21595/33215) | 1st Serve % | 78% (52437/67609) |
| 65% (14095/21595) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (29112/52437) |
| 46% (5357/11618) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (6459/15169) |
| 45% (1644/3622) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (4843/9569) |
| 43% (14010/32822) | Return Points Win % | 49% (33145/67719) |
| 38% (21/35) | Slam W/L | 56% (83/66) |
| 33% (10/20) | Masters W/L | 47% (97/111) |
| 40% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 50% (16/16) |
| 53% (101/90) | Main Tour W/L | 60% (292/197) |
| 69% (204/93) | Challenger W/L | 61% (157/100) |
| 77% (51/15) | Futures W/L | 100% (5/0) |
| 60% (380/631) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (635/1122) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 83% (5/6) |
| 51% (86/168) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (136/245) |
| 54% (119/220) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (178/335) |
| 85% (385/329) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (633/550) |
| 14% (385/55) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (633/83) |
| 23% (260/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (505/95) |
Friedsam vs. Errani Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
